Is he right?

Is he right?

5235.jpg - 553x472, 75.17K

Why do we all see the same Twitter post? Are we just living in the same culture bubbles?

No

But when Star Wars does it suddenly it’s a problem.

hey, we could just spend hours under the blistering sun in the middle of nowhere just CAUSE ART or film this in a studio with AC and ammenities?

hmmmmm tough call

Every movie shot in the blistering sun still looks amazing though, the studio ones are forgotten

modern movies

background is CGI

weather is CGI

props are CGI

How can people seriously watch such garbage

nostalgiafags need to hang

you'd think that filming from outside of the realm of physical space would create lighting and blocking problems.

No not generally. Ask tom cruise while he is clinging to the wheel of a biplane flying over south aftrica.

This is only true for movies from before ~2015. It's gotten to the point that you can't actually tell the difference between real sets and CGI most of the time.

Anon Babble threads used to be made without twitter

You used to respond to them without twitter, I've made this same type of thread before and they died bumpless

You only opened this thread because you hoped there'd be some saucy irrelevant eceleb controversy in it

Twitter was called twitter

They went to exegol? Whaoa

CGI has only gotten worse since 2015.

going outside

what the fuck? have you been outside lately? do you see who's out there?

are you fucking nuts or blind, raj?

why the hell would anyone live in monument valley, movie makes no sense, it's a death valley

Is he right?

Back to twitter

It's gotten to the point that you can't actually tell the difference between real sets and CGI most of the time.

lol

Twitter has managed to find a way to be as awful as Reddit.

This is actually called confirmation bias. You only notice CGI when it is noticeably bad, and therefore you believe those cases to be generally representative of CGI when in reality they're the outliers.

Post some cgi characters who look as convincing as Davy Jones from 2006.

no, it's a matte painting

Post some environmental CGI from 2006 that looks as good as Top Gun Maverick

blah blah blah I graduated from reddit university I am very smart by the way

I've never visited twitter.com but by virtue of using Anon Babble in current year I can say that I'm an honorary twitter user

German expressionist kino was made entirely on the inside. Even shadows were artificial.

yes

That was a specific artistic decision. Look at Lawrence of Arabia vs. DUNC. The former actually feels like a desolate desert while Arrakis in DUNC looks like a shallow, boring matte painting of a desert. The real thing these CGI backgrounds lack is the perception of depth.

yeah

you can't actually tell the difference between real sets and CGI most of the time

Life would be so much simpler if I were this retarded.

do you see who's out there?

Niggers?

unpopular opinion here but the desert looked better in the Dune miniseries than in DUNC

Cope

Yes he is right and that comes with a lot of drawbacks, you have no control over the weather and even less control over light and sound.
Perhaps but you're forgetting that was a common trick in old movie was to use stock footage over a landscape and then play that on a screen which the actors are standing in front of.

I find it hilarious that some modern movies both go out to locations and do CGI and both aspects are shit.

Zoomies and their artificially constructed greenscreen sets deserve the bullet.

I agree

Every movie shot in the blistering sun still looks amazing though

Get a load of this guy.

Yes and no, yes there were many location shoots, but no there were also many "outdoor" scenes shot on sets.

Yeah man it's the 22 year olds who run hollywood

The modern internet is a homogenized mess of slop. You can't escape this crap anywhere anymore.

Lawrence of Arabia and DUNC were literally both filmed in Wadi Rum, Jordan.

It’s all orchestrated

It's not hot year round. It's also a dry heat so it's surprisingly comfortable.

Does every twitter post have to be a thread?
Anon Babble used to make it's own content

why is it so bright?