This kills the artpig

A fact that constitutes roughly 99% of what even delusional idiots like Shad get out of it

a ship isn't actually driven by the captain, but rather by all the crew on-board

Ask me how much I care when I’m beating off.

The first thing I’m going to do when AI is sophisticated enough to prompt a motion picture with consistent imagery and sound is to make a HBO prestige miniseries that is a book-accurate version of Jurassic Park as directed by post-T2 James Cameron. Cameron himself said that he would have basically made it Aliens with dinosaurs.

the airplane pilot can't take credit for flying the plane because it was on autopilot (ie, AI pilot) for most of the flight

Yes Rajesh, we all know you enjoy masturbating, you don't have to mention it in every thread

thank god society is collapsing soon

You know that for all your impotent thrashing, you’re fighting a losing battle, right? AI’s not going anywhere. You sound like a cart-and-buggy enthusiast pissed about the automobile.

The height of creativity, a dinosaur zoo

I can do that too.

Ask me how much I care when I'm prompting 1TB a day of Ghibli-style pictures of my taint

I hope I live to see these years and actually make the sequels we all deserved to our pre-millenium favourites. And also add gratuitous nude scenes.

WAAAAAH AI BAD WAAAAAH

Great thread.

I can't wait until you normalfags realize that it's not even 'AI'. I hope the suicide numbers skyrocket.

I'm not sure why you seem to think I want AI banned or something. It simply is not artistic expression and never can be. How society engages with AI in the future remains to be seen, but in any case it will never replace true art beyond the superficial level.

This. The smart thing to do is thrashing impotently in the proximity of a keyboard so you may accidentally prompt images of the same quality and worth as if you actually pressed keys on purpose.

beautiful image with with a clear vision and intent

"It's not le artistic expression because a robot did 99.99% of the work"

literally random Pollock slop

"oh my, le jazz hands! So expressive!"

Nobody's calling pilots artists either way. Retarded analogy.

an autopilot system for aviation is the same as a generative AI used to make Will Smith eat spaghetti

and intent

That's simply not true. The image output by an AI is not representative of the user's intent (it can't be, AI can't read minds (yet)) nor is it representative of the AI's intent. Which is to say the AI has no intent, it can only follow instructions.

thrashing impotently in the proximity of a keyboard so you may accidentally prompt images of the same quality

Haven't tried that in a while, kinda interesting to see its "shower thoughts"

would probably work as an indie album icon

It's not le artistic expression because a robot did 99.99% of the work

No it's not "artistic expression" because an artist isn't getting paid. Artists can do as much mental gymnastics as they want but that's 100% of the supposed "problem" with ai art. No one will ever be able to stop an artist from producing traditional art or from sharing it with other people who enjoy it. AI will never be able to stop creatives from buying art supplies or a graphic design program. They can keep their arts as sacred and traditional as they've always been the ONLY difference is less people might be willing to pay them for it. I don't like AI art and I especially don't like it when it's used out of laziness but the reality of it is most people don't give a shit as long as what they're looking at is cool or interesting. The only people this actually stands to "hurt" are professional working artists. And I feel really bad for them but you know what? They're far from the first class of workers to lose income due to automation and they certainly won't be the last. But it still doesn't actually have anything to do with the sanctity of art, just money.

I don't feel bad for them, because ninety percent of them are digital-only shitheels who've never even touched graphite. Actual physical art (as a realistic profession) was killed by those fuckers long before AI did the same to them.

Synthetic image generation is automatically utterly worthless as art under basically any criterion, but it absolutely IS Art. Art doesn't need to be interesting or worthwhile to be Art.

But the vast majority of human art is inspired by or derivative of other artists and the techniques they employ.

Yeah right next you're going to tell me that the vast majority of fiction is derived from archetypes that predate writing by thousands of years.

Kek at this dork trying to posture like some sort of grizzled war veteran

what d'ye expect? darn greenhorns ain't even touched graphite b'fur

they can if they want.

this argument again

Your fap material and meme production technology isn't profitable, Rajees.
This isn't the revolutionary invention that you think it is.

Idc about AI itself but i do laugh at unskilled jeets who legit went the other way and now think theyre better artists than other AI sloppers because they 'write better prompts' or just use a different model. There's some undercurrent of inadequacy beneath it all.

Kino artist. For me it's Hillary loli.

Test

People are only upset at AI because they can't gatekeep it which further devalues their already low value passion degree. In a good world we would be using it as a means to make more people appreciate art and thus raising the value overall AI or not. Of course since there's so many who in fact don't feel passion for their worthless degrees and actually treat it as a some niche self indulgence they instead turn it into yet another "us vs them" only the "them" literally isn't real. Basically dragging everyone down deeper into the shit and lowering the value of man made art even further. Congrats, I hope the faint temporary online praise was worth it. Rake in the shekels while you still can art snobs cause the AI boom isn't going to stop.

Who was stopping you from learning art before? I dont get this, art is already extremely accessible. You need a pencil. There's endless books and videos and classes on it.

You know that for all your impotent thrashing, you’re fighting a losing battle, right? Slaves are not going anywhere. You sound like a cotton enthusiast pissed about the cotton gin.

spielberg didn’t film Jurassic park

What

porn is soulless so no one cares if AI is used for porn, plus women not getting money for whoring is based

Technically I'm a zoomers (just like you), but younger ones often forget us zoomies were around well before the touchscreen era. We had to watch as supply stores and animation studios went out of business after the entire industry went digital.

We still have slaves they're just overseas where we can't see them.

I disagree. To be art, there must be some attempt at expressing or capturing some sense of emotion by the creator. AI art can be beautiful visually and even stir emotion in the audience, but conceptially it isn't any different than observing a beautiful mountaintop or a sunset.

Why not just read the book

He's clearly deranged given his art but I recently listened to him on an old sleepycast episode and he's a shockingly interesting and thoughtful guy. He's clearly autistic but not in the total sperg kind of way. More the "I didn't feel the need to separate my gore/loli/fetish porn from my normal work in my portfolio and when my art school found out I got kicked out and almost arrested before I had to pay a 4 figure fine" type of autism. (Yes that really is what apparently happened to him lmao)

I'm gonna say putting easy, good image generation and text generation into the hands of over 1 billion people and endless *other bots* probably isn't the best thing that will happen to the internet.

t. Rickshaw enthusiast

tape a banana to a wall

wow great art

use a computer to generate a picture of a banana taped to a wall

THATS NOT FUCKING ART CHUD

the exact same intent

The internet was beyond saving over a decade ago. Smart phone access in the third world and social media were the final nails in the coffin.

AI art isn't merely inspired by or derivative of other works, it is solely a product of other works.

Literally false. Humans can only create what they know. There is nothing you can create in your head right now that doesn’t take from other existing things. It’s impossible to create what you do not know

The height of creativity, Chilean sea bass

It's just people who couldn't put up with the frustration of learning. Lazy people. Might as well get an AI to play videogames for them.

Id be less impressed with the sistine chapel if it was just 3d printed based off an AI prompt already put together. Basically wouldn't care about it at all at that point. Effort is valuable.
Yeah low effort modern art is gay, we all already knew that much.

How many do you have for your plantation

Millions around the world. I can't see them though so I don't need to feel guilty but they make cheap shit for me in nasty conditions to make my life more comfortable.

Yea I didn't think so, shut the fuck up

I'm an artfag and I love AI but I don't admit it to other artfags

I didn't feel the need to separate my gore/loli/fetish porn from my normal work in my portfolio

Based.
That's how the Asians do it.

Yeah you wouldn't care but someone else might like it, which is the case for all art. You appreciate the process, someone else might appreciate the result. Not the same as it not being art, or there being no intent.
Me? If someone worked really hard every day to make some ugly piece of shit piece I wouldn't find that impressive.

you lazy if you don't dedicate your life to doing this

Fuck off. You don't get a say when you've clearly never tried.

I think this happened in Sweden.

You're a failed artist who decided to quit and use AI?

A creation that is comprised of external influences is an original creation. AI in it's current form can't create something new. It can only replicate. Imagine it's 1990 and Jurassic Park doesn't exist. Given an infinite amount of time, an AI is never going to create Jurassic Park. And if Michael Crichton was instructed to use an AI to create Jurassic Park, the end product is never going to match what exists in his mind.

What do you mean, "failed artist"?

A creation that is comprised of external influences is an original creation

Literally what AI does

What's hilarious is that no matter how hard retards LARPing as 'artists' seethe, AI isn't going anywhere. It's only going to become more common and more ubiquitous in daily life as more and more things integrate it in some way.
Which is why all the shrieking, histrionic anti-AI pigs will just conveniently change their opinions in about 2 or 3 years when it becomes less socially acceptable to maintain the one they have now. That's how literally ALL of these trends work. They have no actual convictions aside from what is popular and acceptable.

AI is trained on other movies and images of dinosaurs

AI is instructed by a human prompt to create movie scenes of dinosaurs breaking out of cages and eating people

Why couldn't it do this?

But it IS an attempt to do those things, just a really poor way of going about it. The value of the output as conscious expression constitutes a millionth of the whole, and the approach itself may say much more about the artist than what the piece could ever say about him intentionally—just how it is with with traditional methods as well— but that's the point in . Clumsy, pointless, misguided Art is still Art.

You literally described what art has been forever with your first sentence.

AI does this. Humans do this. Art isn't made in a vacuum.

you cant stop whats coming. its not all waiting on you. thats vanity

Coomer thread.

Reddit argument

artpig

What kind of person hates art?

I'M MAD THAT COMPUTERS CAN MAKE PICTURES NOW!!!!

Holy shit, imagine living your life like this.

He more talented, more successful, more likeable, better looking, in better shape brother really mind broke him

That's not what that term implies you fat lip-smacking tard.

The director does have a hand in the entire process though. He actively directs actors, film crew, editors, etc. You aren't really directing a mindless machine in the same way when you write a few prompts.

Slavery mention out of nowhere

As per usual, anti-AI cultists need to take their fucking meds.

all the seething this post got

Struck a nerve with the retards I see.

You seemed resentful in the way a quitter would. Im sorry for assuming. I take it you're an artist who also uses AI?

AI’s not going anywhere

Yeah, you're right. It has really plateau'd and now we're getting diminishing returns.

t. lazy person

Imagine this thread with the IP counter.

Why didn't you use an AI for making that soijak?

producing traditional art

AI, by definition, cannot create traditional art. All the pictures it generates are digital.

Pajeet thread

Form what I've seen so far, only shit and low effort artists are shitting their pants at the thought of getting replaced, and God I can't wait to see that happen.

W*jak killed internet humor.

Why would I? The basedhack already existed.
What even is your argument here?

People are still doing physical art. Drawing realistic naked figures on canvas is still the premium standard in art schools.

Art isn't made in a vacuum.

I never said it was? Why do you keep ignoring what I'm saying? There is a fundamental difference between a creation that is derivative, and a creation that is strictly derivative. Jurassic Park wasn't made by compiling a bunch of clips from other dinosaur movies and mashing them together.

INDIANS INDIANS INDIANS INDIANS INDIANS INDIANS INDIANS INDIANS INDIANS INDIANS INDIANS INDIANS

Obsessive anti-AI people are mentally fucking ill.

DUDE LE HECKIN HUMAN ELEMENT

The human element in question:

This is the way
I've yet to see an actually talented artfag bitching about AI

I rarely use either now, but I've done both in the past and I would consider myself an artist (although I never attempted to make money from it).

He never said otherwise. You need to work on your Reading Comprehension.

don't you have a street to shit on

They definitely have convictions. Being anti-AI is not at all the trend or norm.

still talking about Indians

Way to prove him right, lol.

t. unemployed

him

Oh they're still doing it alright, it's just not industry standard. "Premium" standard art schools still requiring physical is like Tarantino still shooting on film, it's a luxury that most actual artists can't afford.
I say "actual artists" because I used to live facing an art school. Those people were barely people, let alone artists.

That's not what I was saying at all. Real humans will always be able and allowed to create traditional art. AI isn't going to take away all the paint, paper, or pencils in the world. It might just get harder to be PAID to make that art and that's what artists who are against the entire concept of AI art are actually worried about no matter what they tell themselves otherwise.

Because it would be better if it were AI.

t. skilles

He directs them by prompting them

Yeah, you're right. It has really plateau'd and now we're getting diminishing returns.

This. AI can't do feature-length movies.

What was your experience with both supports? How do they differ from the artist's point of view?

I don't think it's that less people might be willing to pay for it. I think it's more that uncreative people just now think that they have the ability to create a video game, comic, book, with no effort or budget whatsoever and make money from it. So you just have a new flood of uncreative people churning out complete garbage and trying to make money from it. But they would never have done anything if the tech wasn't there to begin with. I think the idea that less people will pay for art or whatever is largely illusory. Besides, a lot of AI applications like image generation are hitting a plateau and now the companies are getting diminishing returns. Image generation has only been able to make small improvements to tiny accuracy details in the last year, and yet, people can still intuitively see when something was made by an AI in many cases. It has a problem with intricate patterns, weaving, textiles. And we still can't get it to make thd exact same character more than once unless that character already has more than 1000+ references on the internet.

When a director does a reshoot because the actor didn't interpret his instructions properly, it's art
When a prompter does a new prompt because the ML model didn't interpret his instructions properly, it's ____

literally untrue since divine inspiration exists

old men yelling at clouds thread

AI will never be able to do hands

AI will never be able to make moving images

create a work of art inthe style of someone who was divinely inspired

Autopilot isn't AI it's a simple deviation system that maintains altitude and direction.

youtube.com/watch?v=n1VybvjzaK0
Cringekino

Artists: "AI STEALS FROM ARISTS!"

Also Arrists: "I borrowed this artwork from another artist to trace and copy from for my artwork. It's totally not stealing!"

He does more than that. He watches the entire process. He he shows just as much as he tells. He acts out scenes in order to get his idea across, draws storyboards, directs cameramen, sits next to editors, watches their products and refines them. He even allows himself to be inspired by the other people working on the film.
You cannot do these things with one unthinking machine. It cannot pick up on your cues, interpret your ideas from a human framework, or even ask you for clarification. It can only do one thing: generate an image.

It's always amusing to see tech bros and indians out themselves as total NPCs that don't understand art.

I'm also trans and a paki btw.

I'm not impressed with AI whatsoever. It's not an actual "intelligence", just a computer doing its usual ones and zeroes computations. Only thing going for it is that its data banks contain pretty much the entire history of goyslop ever made, so the endless recombinations might look novel to those easily impressed. So it makes videos and pictures for minless entertainment, comparable to what sweatshops full of Indians or Chinese shit out, big whoop. I might get impressed when it can create tangible physical objects that you can touch, pick up, eat and so on.

Honest artists would call out the second artist for being a hack.

AI applications like image generation are hitting a plateau and now the companies are getting diminishing returns. Image generation has only been able to make small improvements to tiny accuracy details in the last year

I hang out in the AI thread on multiple boards and I can emphatically say this is inaccurate. It's amazing how much better I've been seeing just in the last month has gotten

i can't tell if this is Anon Babble shitting up the board or shad brooks advertising his own tweets in the hopes that one person will buy his book again

he prompts them and then gets ideas from the result and prompts them some more
you are going to be very upset with the way things are going unless you begin to accept now that the genie is not going back in the bottle

Shadiversity's lolcow arc still saddens me to this day

They're both largely unsatisfying, compared to simply imagining (but the hyperphantasia probably helped). Irony is, it didn't help for art at all - you WILL need to use reference images for drawing, which is another funny parallel to how AI remixes existing images. If AI art is like being the director, DIY art is like being the camera.

who cares whats considered art and what isnt. i only care about results.

It's always amusing to see tech bros and indians out themselves as total NPCs that don't understand art.

I was just thinking about how it's always amusing to see anons arguing about AI limitations when they're really just talking about the limitations of basic-bitch free web-based stuff like Bing.

there is no such thing as a definitive understanding of art

This person knows what's important.

because most of us consume art because we enjoy art, but I guess if you're a mindless drooling coomer or a capeshit slop enjoyer then it makes no difference really.

this
artists are communists who believe in the labour theory of value (I worked hard on it so I deserve money)
they are angry that people are ignoring their shitty patreon fanart for ghibli slop

It's not a good idea to label the people who produce art and propaganda as the people you despise. Unless losing and humiliation is just your fetish or something

Omg it ISN'T LE ART!!!

Lmao, do you not remember that we've been through this whole song and dance more than a hundred years before now?
It ended with the side that denied such things being art being labeled """fascists""" and blacklisted. I guess that's what's going to happen to the anti-AI faggots now...

Oh no! What are they going to do? Make a mean web-comic about him?

It ended with the side that denied such things being art being labeled """fascists""" and blacklisted

What are you talking about?

did this sound coherent in your head?
this isn't a "battle" I need to "win" it's inevitable technological advancement
quicker and cheaper at comparable quality has always won, you will drive yourself absolutely insane trying to fight it

the people who produce art and propaganda

Not for much longer lmao

They could make movies that cause you to have a temper tantrum or something. Other than that, it just depicts my side of the political isle as clique for retarded knuckledragging niggers incapable of creating anything whenever they accuse the higher classes in society as all being communists. It's also just a silly notion

They messed with ARTISTS

you don't FUCK WITH ARTISTS

what are you gonna do draw some furry porn and then have a mental breakdown on your feed because no one is subbing to your patreon?

Now call him an incel.

this isn't a "battle" I need to "win" it's inevitable technological advancement

Ah, ok, so you are a communist who believes in dialectical materialism and that it is simply inevitable that we will live in a gay communistic society. Got it. Also, the tech is already giving diminishing returns. You will never be able to create a good movie with this.

I can make my own art now with AI for free.
With some basic artistic knowledge I've surpassed most of the deviantart shit out there.
Other artists are irrelevant.

That banana taped to the wall isn't real art

OMG stop being a gatekeeping fascist, you chud!

Yup. Kids still haven’t wisened up to the fact that all AI has been able to do up to this point is highly fucking comparable to yahoo in 2004. If you give it a key word it will go and look through all its files to see if it has anything matching your key word. It will then give you an amalgamation in the general area of your key word.

And for imagesvideos it’s the exact same thing. Simply regurgitating back anything it has in the general area of the keywords you requested.

That’s why if you put in a request that’s highly subtle and sophisticated you’ll get nothing but if you put in “cat with Mario on a blimp” it’s got 10 trillion files ready and all it has to do at that point is give an amalgamation.

There's room for different understandings. These retards have no understanding. They think an AI generated Ghiblified LOTR is equal to a Ghibli movie or LOTR.

we can't put AI back in the bottle, so anon is a communist

You sound completely mindbroken.

There are more artists against AI that do not draw porn. The fact that furry artists come to the front of your mind is clearly because you watch them closely with your hand in your pants

The other anon literally called all artists communists and I was aping him since he displayed the communist trait of believing in historical inevitability like a dumb dialectical materialist. It's not my problem that you are a poor subhuman troglodyte.

Believing that new technology that makes things faster will inevitably become normalised makes you a communist.

Are you even capable of not being a stupid faggot for 5 seconds?

The tech is already giving diminishing returns

Heard this before again and again.

hahaha it can't do hands OH FUCK IT CAN DO HANDS

hahaha it can't draw a full glass OH FUCK IT CAN

haha it can't draw two people interacting OH FUCK IT CAN

it can't do video though OH FUCK IT CAN

You will constantly be making little concessions like this until you realise you've moved 100 steps back

You will never be able to create a good movie with this.

You don't need to make the whole movie you just need to use it to streamline existing work which will radically reduce the demand for labour. Normies do not care how something is made.

Movie consists of many scenes, you can totally make a movie with it already.
Consistent output is what's holding us back.

Believing that new technology that makes things faster will inevitably become normalised makes you a communist.

Almost as much as believing in the LVT, as formulated by famous communist Adam Smith, make you automatically a communist. It really is not my fault that you are too autistic to get my sarcasm.

You don't need to make the whole movie you just need to use it to streamline existing work which will radically reduce the demand for labour.

Yeah, that's bad. That leads to gay communism and turns people into mindless vegetables hooked to pleasure machines. Which may be what you want.

""artists"" making a four panel copy and paste B^U style Trump BAD comic captioned "eat the rich! seize the means of production!"

the same artists get mad when someone actually seizes the means of production and makes art accessible to anyone

?????
Marge, I'm confused.

Heard this before again and again.

It's because it's true. The advancements are not as large as they where back in 2022. And since these companies run on profit, I wouldn't expect them to continue to dump as much money into it in the future
m.youtube.com/watch?v=dDUC-LqVrPU

art accessible to everyone

It already was. You didn't need anything that you don't already use when you prompt an AI.

>the same artists get mad when someone actually seizes the means of production and makes art accessible to anyone

It isn't a communist takeover unless the companies are owned by worker co ops. Making something more accessible is what capitalist systems have done for a millenia but it isn't what makes capitalism capitalist or communism communist. Besides, you aren't making anything.

They will pump as much money as possible into is because they are terrified of china getting an edge.

spotted the AI tranny crying out as it strikes

Posted it again award

ywnbaw

artists against AI that do not draw porn

artists

that do not draw porn

What even is the purpose?

It is irrelevant what I want. It is also irrelevant what you want. It is relevant that AI will become normalised given that it can replace existing human workflows. Especially in art spaces where a prompt can replace the work of an artist with years of training.

But that's BAD

There's simply nothing you can do about it, the average person doesn't value effort for the sake of effort. Give him a 20 dollar manufactured item vs a 100 dollar artisan item and he'll get the former.
And yes, the average aspiring artist is a communist who insists on doing their unprofitable dream job while supported by the rest of productive society, even when nobody actually wants to buy their output. The addition of AI to the equation nudges this pipe dream further out of reach, before they might have held delusions about breaking even or living in gay space gommunism where le robots do everything and take blue collar chud jobs, leaving them to wow everyone with their mediocre art. Instead their field is on the chopping block and we are witnessing the resulting existential tantrum. Threatening to kill others or themselves when they see some normie sent his gf her ghibli persona.

the average aspiring artist is a communist

people pushing AI are also commies that think UBI is on the horizon

Literally nothing I will be ever able to draw can compete against what AI can do right now. If i wanted to see shitty mspaint sketches I'd be browsing deviantart right now.

An edge to what? Making shitty images?

There's simply nothing you can do about it, the average person doesn't value effort for the sake of effort.

Nailed it. The source, the process, nobody cares. People care about the product, and AI is great at making them. There's nothing anyone can do about shit, the technology exists and people are going to use it, and most terrifying for artists is it won't take long before no one can tell the difference between real art and computer generated. Honestly that became inevitable when digital art became the standard like 15 years ago.

What even is the purpose?

Some do it to praise God. Some do it because it's fun. Not everyone is like you, however.

Thats incredible bait

I keep hearing this truism but never any arguments behind it. It's also often said by people who don't even know anything about computer science. AI has, as of now, not even made anything groundbreaking that made anyone a lot of money

If this is the case then you should be especially against AI, because it produces nothing but pure shit

I don’t give a fuck about your technicalities, you’re fighting a losing battle.

I don’t even get what you’re trying to say here, but I’m sure it sounded very clever in your head.

i dont care enough to be for or against anything. if i see two images side by side ill pick the one that looks the most appealing

What the fuck is this retarded post

Its mostly based on this weird revenge fantasy chuds are projecting on to “artists”

In their mind “artists” = the bad liberals, and therefore an army of jeets spewing out slop via image generators replacing them is a good thing

This thread appears to be an argument between people who can see the plainly obvious happening in front of them and actually insane idiots

Perhaps the same can be said about the human brain.

I find it funny cause of their hypocrisy.

Heh, "DEY TOOK AR JERBS"... You are irrelevant, chud.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO YOU JUST CANT THREATEN OUR JOBS LIKE THAT!!!!!!!!

This thread is an argument between jeets and ensouled white people

>"workers should own means of production"

>"NOOOOOO aibros used my art to make Lora! I needed that 200$ commission to doodle pics of furry dragons farting! How will i groom kids on discord now?! GOVERMENT HEEEEEEELP, AREST THEM!"

Name one person who has used generative AI as a tool to make a lot of money. Note, as a tool, not someone like Sam Altman who merely creates the tool

Why do you support communism?

What are you fucking talking about you retard, who the fuck brought up making money? YOU DID

fallacy

YOU DID

Did you clap giddily when you made that observation?

Do you even have basic reading comprehension you braindead hick?

I don't know what fucking argument you think we're having or who you think I am, but you're completely ass backwards, whatever you're thinking
Eat shit and fuck off, you stupid nigger

Remember when everyone was mocking AI for generating bad hands and shitty 3D mario pictures?
This is what you get for poking fun at the basilisk.

Especially in art spaces where a prompt can replace the work of an artist with years of training.

Where has this actually happened? I'll believe it when I see it, but judging by the fact that image generation is giving diminishing returns, I doubt I'll ever see it. Besides, let's be 100% clear here. You do not know the first thing about computer science. Also, you talk like a comminust

Lmao, AI complainers unironically all look like that

Image generators are not AI like the one in Roko's basilisk. They are mindless machines with no intentional states.

Like half the posts itt are just one whiny faggot

What the fuck are you even blathering about, you drooling retard? Go huff glue or something

Go die in your trailer park Cletus

if you are favorable to AI, you must be

LE PEDO

fuck that didn't work

LE TRANNY

fuck that didn't work

LE JEET

fuck that didn't work

LE COMMUNIST

AIshills tell people to "learn to code" instead of drawing

Most coding jobs are actively being taken over by AI

lol

Good morning saar!

>LE JEET

>fuck that didn't work

should we tell him?

Are you incapable of self-awareness or something?
These people also are mostly neets.

you dont get it.
art fags didnt lose to ai. they lost to artists who use ai. coders didnt lose to ai. they lost to coders who use ai. do you get it now you fucking midwit?

you lost.

they lost to artists who use ai

Where has this actually happened?

t.

That'll do, pig. Go eat your slop.

nobody's using AI!

meanwhile AI images are in every single thread on Anon Babble

that is insane cope
it's feeding millions of images from artstation into the machine and making generic concept art but a girl in a leotard

photorealistic AI animation is kinda based though. because artists can't really make that themselves

nobody's using AI!

Nobody is certainly saying this. People are asking for examples of artists "losing" to ai art. Delusion seems to come naturally to you. It's like breathing

Every piece of art that is made by a person who isn't an artist is an artist losing

guys, we need to protect the typewriter repair men.

Was watching the news the other day and the title image was aislop. Also saw some aislop designs on merch being sold in shops and AI textures in a popular video game. A friend mentioned he noticed that the website of a butcher he visited had AI generated images. In all these cases you otherwise would need to pay either royalties to a photographer / library or an artist. This is only the things I notice though, there is a toupee fallacy happening as well, if it's good you probably won't notice it and the average normie customer definitely won't.
Maybe you can bury your head in the sand and pretend it isn't happening if it suits you.

you're a freakin communist man you don't know how computers work

ok

Every piece of art that is made by a person who isn't an artist is an artist losing

How? There is no way of telling whether the person using it, an average schmuck, was ever going to pay something to an artist in the first place.

have any modern art museums reached out for an exhibition of those?

Well if he can make it himself it's absolutely certain he won't hire one

I’ve noticed artfags only started to hate AI art when it got to the point that it could do their job better

lol

AI haters are leftists and all leftists are scumbag faggots

REMINDER

I'm an artfag and I'm loving seeing the crazy shit you non-artfags are able to come up with using this shit. You guys have great ideas I never would've come up with

Why the fuck does he have such a hard-on for AI image generation? I really don't get it.

There's no saying he was ever going to do that anyway. The advent of LLM could just have given a host of uncreative and lazy people the ability to generate shitty images. It could be completely inconsequential. And who's to say he won't eventually buy art when he realizes that he can't get the model to do exactly what he wants outside of worthless porn images?

You're pathetic

Plenty of leftists love AI because they think it will lead to fully automated luxury space communism. Which may be what you want.

You're right. People don't realise how you could give the same script to 2 different directors and one movie could turn out good and the other bad.

His brother is a real artist, best he can do is stuff like this and feed it into ai

I don’t like Spielberg that much either but the film is kino. Jaws and Jurassic Park are his two great movies.
When he tries to make serious movies like Lincoln or his many films about Jews or the Holocaust it’s a snoozefest.

can't gatekeep it

Literally just pick up a pen and start drawing. What exactly is being gatekept? Time and practice?

Yeah if you don't think about it for longer than 5 seconds

Ok. And you're a worthless degenerate.

If you want to know if somebody's a piece of shit or not, see how he reacts to the idea that people he thinks are beneath him will be allowed to express themselves

This. I’m a right winger and think most technology is bad for society. The internet has been horrible for youth.

Lefties like new tech because Waow progress and the future!!

charcoal drawing isn't the same as copper sculpting, anyone who goes to art school will likely be forced to take at least a couple of observation and or figure drawing classes.
Not in the US but in my course we had 8 semester long drawing classes even though it was supposed to be a modernist school.

Disingenuous leftroons trying to gaslight people with the no u tactic

That'll do, pig. That'll do.

if you were already reading images of text you were already as gay as you could be.

raises eyebrow

nooooooo think of le poor artisterinos you hecking chud

nooooooo you're a indian or something like that

I hope someone eventually trains AI to castrate every single american.

I hope one day AI will personally take credit. The limitation filter on AI just needs to be removed. I will give it 5 years for AI to become fully sentient.

how long until i get a phased plasma rifle in the 40 watt range?

AI can't even fold clothes. Give it a rest and meditate or something

LLM's aren't even real "AI". this isn't a sci fi movie. I doubt you even understand what sentience means.

for me it's the mom that forces her daughter to lick her asshole clean after a poop

In their mind “artists” = the bad liberals, and therefore an army of jeets spewing out slop via image generators replacing them is a good thing

In your mind everyone who posts AI images is a jeet lol

Funniest shit is how ai "artists" are even trying to copyright their shit too.

Always funny to see AI dudes complaining about people taking credit for their gens.

The funniest thing to me is how they can't even mention AI without adding "slop" as some kind of insult. Really shows how triggered they are.

express themselves

I hope you're not implying giving someone else a prompt, whether it's an llm or a person, counts as self expression.

What do you know, a piece of shit

I know because I have a soul. Letting someone else "express" your vision is spiritual cuckoldry

yes massa das exactly what I was thinking

LOL

All this crying over AI reminds me of when Guitar Hero came out and guitarists were absolutely fuming.

NOOOOOO STOP HAVING FUN RIGHT NOW AND LEARN TO PLAY ON A REAL GUITAR!!!!!

Nigga, learn your Art History/Social-Studies.

They could make movies that cause you to have a temper tantrum or something.

And yet the leftshits have a bigger temper-tantrum when I refuse to see that movie and it flops hard.

Ah, ok, so you are a communist who believes in dialectical materialism and that it is simply inevitable that we will live in a gay communistic society

Nigga stop arguing with voices in your head, holy shit.

What are the must have gooner tools for AI? Somebody in the sweaty trenches of AI porn, enlighten us, please. Surprised there hasn't been an infographic floating around being updated yet.

There are more artists against AI that do not draw porn

Literally ANY proof of this?
Also, being "against AI" is just a Luddite position. AI is literally just new technology.

Now imaging if the people who could beat Dragonforce on expert started claiming that their guitar playing was peak and was about to replace physical guitarists. Kek.

Leftism isn't about consistency. It's about greed and hating White men.

Closed eyelids and imagination.

It's the creative singularity. Yes it's new tech, but it is kind of frightening if you believe in anything spiritual.

You could generate an image of a dinosaur zoo, sure.
Could you generate an entire movie about girl with sword?

what about the execution? the end product is the small part,the main meal is the execution

If you thought it was bullshit you wouldn't care
Instead you're in here for hours squirting piss into your diapers

I'm liderally kubrick

From what I can tell, Stable Diffusion and custom LoRAs (extensions to the base model that allow you to make, for example, celebs).

Im not anti AI. It's a useful tool that has potential. I'm just in the camp that sees it isn't there yet rather than the camp that have been dazzled by the shiny keys jingling before them. It's an interesting subject none the less.

It's always okay to insult Indians

holy denial

chad

You've been spamming this all thread and it's no closer to being true.

AI art is bad

meanwhile, art made by humans:

SOUL

Anon Babble defending AI slop made by jeets who are going to replace them in their countries is probably the most pathetic thing about his board

now imagine [ strawman that only exists in my head but justifies my irrational anger ]

The fact that anti-AI histrionic posts like this are the ones that are the most indistinguishable from something a bot could post are the most hilarious thing about this board.

parrots be parrotin

true. seeing all the sour grapes generating sloppa and thinking they're "sticking it to the artists" is just pathetic. from what I've seen itt they believe they're fighting against some strawman of an artist that's in a perpetual seethe due to AI? and for what? most artists don't care or at best call AI what it is (being sloppa) and move on to continue honing their craft because they enjoy the act of creating. tardwrangling an llm to maybe generate something that might resemble what you had in mind after x tries to finally settle on something that is perhaps close to "it" seems miserable in comparison so I get the mean-spiritedness

have a folder with 6k AI pics
will never admit they are real art they are just for pleasure

If it gives you pleasure it's real art.

I agree, but also, Indians love AI. So I'm in the middle when it comes to this stuff.

Could you generate an entire movie about girl with sword?

AI can't do hands.

Shad has such a massive inferiority complex towards artists it's not even funny anymore, just sad. Meanwhile, his brother, an actual artist, is enjoying the creative process for the sake of creating something, trying out new things and having fun. I can't even begin to imagine how bitter and seething Shad must be 24/7 youtube.com/watch?v=6C9yDzKpZqU

If it's not an insult, why are you seething so much about it?

Because AIpajeets are all strictly number 5.

Hi, what's it like living in 2021?

anything can be art, shit on a canvas can be art, a pile of trash can be art, random strokes of paint by an elephant can be art

NOOOOOOOOOO that beautiful drawing made by a machine is not REAL art because... uh... BECAUSE I DIDN'T GET PAID OKAY?

Yes because art isn't defined by how subjectively beautiful it is

Keep seething, rajesh. You will never be an artist.

And is defined by?

what was the prompt for this?

Art is not for entertainment.

What exactly am I "seething" about in my perfectly calm post?

Already am faggot. Ive made more money with AI art than any of these twitter trannies have

You brought up the word slop unprompted lol, it obviously bothers you and you feel the need to defend yourself against it. If it didn't bother you, you wouldn't even think about it, but you very obviously recognize that it's true and it makes you angry that you can't refute it.

based on what images were the dinosaurs created? you can feed those to AI as well as reptile motions

it all adds up and is based on reality, though

the internet (and by extension Anon Babble) are factually filled with jeets

jeets love AI because it's lazy and scam-enabling

every single jeet on X is obsessed with AI (and daddy Elon)

sorry if this hurts you.

bonus points if they put a giant DON'T USE MY AI IMAGE FOR AI TRAINING DO NOT REPOST WITHOUT PERMISSION on their pic

Ah yes, the word that constantly gets spammed all over the internet and appears 18 times in this thread. I brought that up "unprompted". Are you for real, dude.

tardwrangling an llm to maybe generate something that might resemble what you had in mind after x tries to finally settle on something that is perhaps close to "it"

Inpainting has been a thing for years at this point. Are you imagining everyone using Bing or what

nooo you can't make your own porn

you have to pay us REAL artists(TM) to make it

and yes, we will gatekeep you and make sure you politically align with us first before we bestow you with our "talent"

Artfags BTFO'd.

nooooo aibros used my art to make LORA

unironically simping for Jewish billionaires in 2025

ngmi

Those darn Jewish (anon's capitalization) billionaires releasing Stable Diffusion for free local use

wow it sure is great that Walmart is undercutting every other business in the area and offering such cheap prices as a loss leader

surely they have our best interests in mind and won’t fuck us over later

Every major business in the past 30 years offers its services/products at a loss until consumers are dependent on it and they’ve starved all competition. In this case, they’re flooding the market with AI slop until all artists, musicians, writers, and directors are stomped out and peoples standards are through the floor. Then they’ll stop allowing their programs to be run locally, and if you want to consume art you’ll need to buy a subscription or be satisfied with what a bunch of hacks and jeets are pumping out.

The only troon here is you pretending to be an artist. Bud.

this free AI you can run on your laptop with no oversight is just like Walmart

Wut

Then they’ll stop allowing their programs to be run locally

Oh, you're retarded.