Accurate raptors, according to 'le science'.
Accurate raptors, according to 'le science'
Featherfags are the absolute most obnoxious "UMMM ACKSHUALLY" pieces of shit I've ever seen
dont care
Jurassic Park is better the way it was made and dinosaurs look better without feathers.accuracy isnt important
OP here. I agree with you. I would prefer to run from a reptile than to a bird.
lmao
le science
Dinosaurs didn't have feathers, scales, skin, or flesh. They were all skeletons.
Top looks like it'd taste like Alligator
Bottom looks like it'd taste of chicken
Godzilla vs. Kong
That's an interesting theory. Harvard?
Looks cool
hey remember that cool thing you liked
oh yeah that ruled
well according to peer reviewed studies it actually sucked and is gay
Why are redditors like this?
Looks like shit.
Death to all featherfags
Yeah people in the middle east are brown
Bottom looks like an animal that might actually have existed at some point
kino
They arent dinosaurs in Jurassic Park though. They literally explained this in the first movie and then again in the Jurassic World movies. They fucking made man made dinisaurs things in World. They're purely designed to look cool themepark monsters.
crabs in a bucket. you will be as unhappy as them and you will like it.
They're mostly dinosaurs, just with some frog dna mixed in
eat eggs
don't eat eggs
eat eggs
no, don't eat eggs
eat eggs
no no no, don't eat them
That's your precious science.
bottom looks like some retarded deviantart creation
Kinda looks like a Road Runner here.
Never mentioned by any religions
Never mentioned by any past-civilizations
No records at all until the 19th century
Discovered by a museum employee
Only then were fossils “uncovered” globally
No complete skeletons were found until 2020
Sir Richard Owen was Darwin’s arch-enemy
Owen was also a member of numerous secret societies
Anyone else come to conclusion that the “dinosaurs” were complete bullshit? Seems to me that it was a ruse to manipulate the records of history, bring attention to museums, and more importantly, cover up the bones of giant humans and mammals.. Never mind the fact it’s become the very basis for evolution theory, the Big Bang, and ‘fossil fuels’… In 1999 National Geographic had to pull its November issue, due to a scientist proving that the bones for an “Archaeo-Raptor” dinosaur actually consisted of 5 different mammals.
Here is a great video on the subject, that was of course removed by YT years ago: web.archive.org
yyyaaasssss
Slay Queen!
Never mentioned by any past-civilizations
Retard
Looks pretty fucking scary and almost certainly accurate. Why are scalefags such babies?
Anyone else come to conclusion that the “dinosaurs” were complete bullshit?
99% of history is complete bullshit with very very few sprinkles of truth.
I would snuggle the FUCK out of this thing after I gave it a handful of mealworms.
Uh, more like a giant TURKEY!
This is why nerds used to get beat up.
featherfags think this look menacing
That's just some Jewish guy's anti-Christian propaganda.
People in the Levant are White.
ground eagle
This
Same goes for incels bitching about historical accuracy. It's better when dinosaurs are cool instead of gay birds. It's better when characters wear cool armour instead of boring hyper realistic shit. It's better when you have modern diversity in a historical setting. It just makes for much more engaging entertainment overall, which is what movies are.
There’s absolutely nothing wrong with ‘umm ackshually’ if you’re actually correct.
Accuracy is the most important thing.
Yes there is, people don't care about truth if the lie is better.
shut up featherfag
There is if you're bring a faggot. Which (You) are.
Oh really. So I guess you'd prefer an "accurate" war movie which is 3h of characters quietly sitting in a defensive position or travelling? Lmao
Fiction is actually not real life
It's better when dinosaurs are cool instead of gay birds.
It's better when characters wear cool armour instead of boring hyper realistic shit.
It's better when you have modern diversity in a historical setting.
One of these is not like the other.
yes, its basically proven at this point
how much of a mindbroken schizo do you have to be to think that this is some kind of conspiracy
RAPTORS had fucking feathers. Raptor is the Latin word for bird. They were killer birds of various sizes. All the other name dinos were featherless.
I’m a scientist. The physical truth is always better through its very nature as the truth.
Israeli-Chinese team
Showing the pitched battles that actually happened isn’t inaccurate, nor is skipping from battle to battle, it’s simply selectively showing the time periods you want.
That's kinda the whole idea of prehistory
The JP raptors were females and would have had solid black or brown feathers. Males would have had colorful plumage.
No it’s not but fiction based off of real life should care about the actual reality of the thing.
The Bible repeatedly mentions leviathans and such. Giant reptilians are one of the most universal cultural myths. You're just a contrarian retard.
here's your turkey
Because scales are scarier than feathers
All fiction is "based on real life" to varying degrees
No it isn't because its way too large to be an accurate velociraptor.
pronating forelimbs
Nope, still not accurate
You mean like in the original version of All Quiet in the Western Front?
Accurate raptors
Only because you actually do want accuracy for things you personally care about. Most people don't give a shit though
Ok except every popular war movie has constant fighting with little time passing in between.