I didn't do enough
I didn't do enough
jews
you're not gonna convince Anon Babbletards to stop larping. that's the whole point. it's fun for them to imagine they could scare someone when most of them look like venti fanbois irl.
can't wait for some EDGY Anon Babble comments on this thread! hold on to your seat!
enough
trannies are actually good
but all nazis were trannies
Doesn't this mean all nazis were good?
I support a full scale invasion of russia.
edgy is a given but it always amazes me how FUNNY and CREATIVE they are
this scene makes me cry
this doesn't intimidate you?
If you hate Arabs and other immigrants so much, why do worship the jews responsible for bringing them to your country?
imagine the grease trail. he looks like hyde before the roids.
why do the countries accept them? is that the jews fault too?
what do you care about illegals? you don't work and everyone's a physical threat to you anyways.
I don't worship Jews and Jews aren't responsible for bringing them to Europe.
Yes. Because those countries and their immigration policies are controlled by jews.
high-trust society with largely agreeable and similar cultural values. I'd argue a high surrender rate is actually a good indicator of how reasonable a society is.
imperial japan was also somewhat high-trust, but nips were fucking brainwashed and crazy. there's no honor in killing medics and detonating grenades while surrendering.
I don't worship Jews
I doubt it.
Jews aren't responsible for bringing them to Europe.
Yes, they are.
holocaust.claims
controlled (and obviously by every single jew)
60 gorillion goy collaborators are always innocent
this is why no one takes you seriously
No one said their collaborators are innocent. But thanks for conceding the central point.
this is why no one takes you seriously
Except the ADL/FBI and the entire global jewish establishment lol.
Why should I trust this website?
holocaust.claims
Are you serious?
The article has many citations. Whether you choose to "trust" them is up to you.
Are you serious?
Yes. Are you?
lol
coping and seething
Spielberg decides to make a Holocaust film and the plot is that a rich guy gives up his stuff to save people's lives and it's supposed to be a tragedy that this guy is losing his material wealth. Like this billionaire Jew can only comprehend money and nothing else. It's like in Amistad there's a slave rebellion at the very beginning and then for the rest it's a courtroom drama involving property rights.
Concession accepted. You can now move on to the next thread you plan to disrupt.
It's a holocaust denial website, it's pretty much worthless. And what citations? To antisemitic publications?
Yes
Well, clearly not. You posted a link to a meme website that lies about the holocaust.
Concession accepted
*tips fedora*
you plan to disrupt
no, (((they))) paid me to stay here and ''''demoralize'''' you
holocaust denial is not logical, we have
photographic evidence
en.wikipedia.org
eyewitness testimony
archives.gov
confession of former nazis
document evidence
en.wikipedia.org
physical evidence
scientificamerican.com
Furthermore, if your argument concedes that it did happen but the numbers were inflated, that still makes it a REALLY BAD thing even if it was just a few hundred thousand innocent people genocided instead of a few million. That's still makes it a horrible, unprecedented crime against humanity.
was zyklon b shit for real? how did they not gas themselves with those tiny chimneys?
It's a holocaust denial website
Yeah.
it's pretty much worthless.
No it's not.
And what citations? To antisemitic publications?
If you consider ynet, the Jersusalem Post, haaretz and israAID antisemitic publications, then yeah.
Well, they're not getting their money's worth.
No it's not
It is. I just checked one of their articles. It's worthless.
Czechoslovakia was an unnecessary, fake country created by the overstepping of power by the WW1 victors—not too dissimilar to Kosovo today, actually. Czechoslovakia was created by these WW1 victors to be weaponized against Germany with no consideration to how they were going to affect the lives of millions of people. As a leader, it would have been irresponsible for Hitler to allow the Czech threat to remain. Thus the answer to the question posed in the last article, “was the annexation of remainder of Czechoslovakia proof of aggressive expansionism?”, is no. Hitler was doing what was needed to protect his country and his people.
Laughable, really. It's the same author as your article. Stop being so naive, people.
It's not. I just checked one of the articles. It's factual and informative.
BTW, have you decided whether jewish newspapers and aid organisations are antisemitic or not? Or did you just want to skate over that entirely?
What about this?
This plan was eventually tabled since then Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meier feared it could generate a huge backlash from the German people. In the 1960s Israel was considerably less powerful and secure than it is today, so such bold plans had to be put on hold until later. But it demonstrates that foisting the Arabs on Europe as a form of racial revenge was on the minds of the Jews in Israel from the very beginning.
Complete nonsense. Germany actually needed workers. It's why they signed a deal with Turkey.
Should I even read further?
It's not factual and informative. You're just dumb and uneducated so you're easily impressed. You're probably not even white.
what do you get out of imaging that the jews control everything? does it excuse your life being bad?
Do what you want. No one gives a shit.
jews aren't White either but you love them. So I'll take that as a compliment.
so nobody died? Anon Babbletards are so invested in the larp they don't know what they're arguing about.
if someone could dig up fax that the 'holocaust industry' is for whatever reason inflating the numbers w/o dick riding your daddy adolf, it could be interesting but the narrative you niggers present is always '100k+? that's nothing. that means it was a desirable government to live under.' i mean it was a gay country even w/o the killings.
you don't see how you're a lolcow?
What do you get out of crying about Palestinians and antisemitism on an anonymous message board for literally 10 years?
always use head cannon when you can't answer
very pikerian. are you a hasan viewist?
if someone could dig up fax that the 'holocaust industry' is for whatever reason inflating the numbers w/o dick riding your daddy adolf, it could be interesting
That's been done for decades. Most holocaust revisionists aren't supporters of Hitler. The current leading revisionist is a committed liberal. You can find his work at holocausthandbooks.com and holocaustencyclopedia.com
Enjoy! And consider making a donation.
another brown white supremacist
lol everytime
I don't know what that refers to, so I have to answer no.
I never claimed to be a White supremacist. What is your issue with brown people? Are you a racist?
In fact, nowhere there is mentioned that they wanted a racial revenge on Germany. They wanted to get rid of Arabs and Germany wanted workers. There's no secret document or anything, at least nothing she posted proving that it was out of some racial revenge.
Then the main argument is that US (so obviously also Israel, lol) destroyed Libya (while the role of for example France is completely ignored) which is what started the migrant crisis.
Then there's a bunch of citation about Israeli organizations that help refugees who are already in Europe. Naturally not a single evidence that Israelis help them arrive to Europe.
And no surprise as neo-Nazis generally support Putin, there's no mention of Russia trying to push millions of refugees through Polish and Baltic border.
This pin. Two months. This is gold. Two more months. He would have given me two for it, at least one. One more month of Anon Babble pass. A month, Stern. For this.
sorry i meant brown nazi, even funnier
ignores the second part
ok, i'll look it up. now why do i need to support your ideology of fetish gear nanny staters?
Never claimed to be a nazi either.
You don't need to do anything. I'm not your master.
The current leading revisionist is a committed liberal.
Who? I don't know any revisionists that aren't neo-Nazis.
Germar Rudolf.
I don't know any revisionists that aren't neo-Nazis.
Then you don't know many.
i'm not trying to achieve anything by bringing this stuff up
wow, what a cop out. this went almost exactly like every other time i talked to a Anon Babbletard. you should watch some movies made by jews instead of constantly getting dunked on. now that's what's really demoralizing.
Rudolf is a neo-Nazi, or at least an antisemite.
In July 2019, Rudolf was arrested near his home in Red Lion, Pennsylvania for "open lewdness" after being found exercising at 4:06 a.m. in a public park "naked from the waist down." He was later found guilty of indecent exposure and open lewdness, for which he was sentenced to two years of probation.[17][18]
Why are Nazis like this?
I am indeed not trying to achieve anything; nothing beyond countering the pro israel/anti Palestine spammer who has polluted this site for over 10 years. I don't use Anon Babble. I do sometimes watch movies made by jews.
Uh, no he's not. Try reading his work or listening to his interviews.
to kike’s giving up your money is like giving up your first born child
He is just a hapless chemist who did some tests and realized the gas chambers are a myth. He went to prison for publishing his findings because modern Germany is pathetic.
this was OBVIOUSLY a fabricated case to silence him. i mean if you look at the alt-righters, they're all perfectly adjusted people. especially ethan ralph.
Misrepresentation of the facts.
germarrudolf.com
It was a fabricated case. Whether it was to "silence" him is debatable.
if you look at the alt-righters
He's not an "alt-righter," whatever that might be.
Uh, no he's not. Try reading his work or listening to his interviews.
Quote something.
Weird as other chemists don't agree with him.
Burden of proof is on the claimant; quote something proving that he's a nazi or antisemite.
Because they will lose their jobs and titles and be sent to prison, as he did.
Agreed. The sanctions against Germany post WW1 and the starvation of Jewish workers by Churchill were, in fact, really bad. Not as bad as being thrown into a cage with bears and eagles or a masturbation machine, but bad. Unprecedented even
I COULD HAVE GASSED MORE
weird ending
but what about the height of the chimneys? i wasn't trolling, i don't know shit about it. qrd?
You can search holocaust.claims for things you want to know about.
Jews control politics, media, banking and finally got their plot of land after throwing a tantrum and killing white British and Arab people. When are you going to quit playing the victim? Or is it that its literally in your DNA? You know, if everywhere you go people hate you it may be because you're the problem.
lol.
He's a holocaust denier and works with actual neo-Nazis, he's worshipped at CODOH and IHR.
What about them?
Millions of Jews got deported to the East. They were not found and the revisionist have precisely zero evidence they weren't murdered as there weren't even big camps there. Starvation is completely irrelevant here. Revisionist have no narrative when it comes to Jews deported to Operation Reinhard camps (supposedly transit camps).
Burden of proof is on the claimant
oh geeeez, the cope
*tips fedora super intensely*
if you claim one could deduce he's not antisemitic by listening to his interviews, you imply there's readily available proof. and you know the interviews. why can't you provide the proof without burdening others?
see wouldn't the gas descend on the rest of the camp including the guards? now mind you, i know nothing about chemistry, so if it's too laborious to explain, don't bother, it's just one of Anon Babble's classic talking points that i could never figure out.
the holocaust didn't happen
He's a holocaust denier and works with actual neo-Nazis, he's worshipped at CODOH and IHR.
Assuming that as true, so what? It's not relevant to his research and findings. Do you not know what ad hominem fallacy is?
What cope? If one makes a claim, it is incumbent on him to prove that claim. This is basic science and logic that even a child should be capable of understanding.
why can't you provide the proof without burdening others?
It really is incredible that so many people simply do not understand the most basic rule of evidence.
wrong, it did and we have lots of proof
A pile of shoes
unprecedented
Stalin did ethnic cleansing before Hitler, but of course "relocating" (=prison camps in Siberia until death) some Ugric half-Asians doesn't count since they are not the Chosen People.
their own documents and expressed desire to exterminate people
No. Why would that happen? Also, the gas is only that deadly in relatively high concentration. I honestly don't understand the question. The ovens were in another room, the chimneys were connected through underground flues. Cremated bodies wouldn't emit gas, why would they?
expressed desire to exterminate people
???
It's not relevant to his research and findings
ideology doesn't influence one's work
this has to be satire
No poltard this doesn't work either.
You're not presenting any evidence. Burden of proof is on you here.
Yes we know this is another protected off topic influence thread.
anon, do you remember when you started saying Anon Babbletard? not to brag but i think i invented it. but it could be a case of parallel thinking, so if you invented it on your own, please don't give me agita about stolen valor.
Seems like you're just mad you got btfo. Maybe stick to Anon Babble next time.
I don't recommend it. For example, here is the photo she analyzed in her article about open cremation.
She seems to be using only old stuff from old Rudolf and Mattogno books.
The smoke is too small for her.
He (Mattogno) figures that the amount of smoke indicates a cremation of 60-70 corpses, not a mass cremation as claimed by the official Holocaust narrative.
Okay.
Ideology has no influence on objective fact. According to your logic, 1+1=2 is somehow questionable if a person with nazi ideology says it.
this has to be satire
I have similar reaction to how frequently I encounter people who simply don't understand what an ad hominem fallacy is, like yourself. A great indictment of the education system.
the jews run Anon Babble too now
lol
Here is crema V from another day. Is this enough smoke for few hundred bodies? Why isn't this photo mentioned?
Looks suspiciously like a wisp of cloud. Not seeing the burning pits of horror here.
She seems to be using only old stuff
As opposed to recently-taken photos of the functional camp. Right.
You are not smart enough to discuss this subject. You should quit before you embarrass yourself further.
That poster is on your side, stupid.
objective fact
if only what you're talking about was as simple as addition. you should read against method by paul feyerabend to get rid of this rick and morty positivism towards science.
will zoomer still simp to israel?
In the old photos some of this stuff wasn't visible, so she claims it was a lie.
According to Hilberg’s source, Filip Müller, there should be five pits in this area which is north of Crema V
Well, I see 4 such pits. One might be obscured by the smoke or maybe trees.
Where were they getting the wood from to burn so many corpses? Not a lot of trees around there. Seems incredibly inefficient and would surely not burn evenly. What did they do with the leftover remains?
See:
There are other photos.
I think they used coke. I'm not sure, they definitely used coke in the ovens.
It's the same principle. The veracity of a claim has no relation to the person who makes it. If you have a problem with basic empiricism and scientific method, take it to a philosophy forum.
The other photos are "old stuff" too, moron.
i do have a problem with empiricism and that book is all about it. do you deny philosophy then?
What about the bone fragments and teeth that wouldn't burn entirely? What happened to those?
both liberal and conservatives dislike them for different reasons
Anon Babblepositing and vrilposting has "redpilled" conservative zoomers
the palestinians getting shoa'd by (((them))) has "redpilled" liberal zoomers
He's a holocaust denier and works with actual neo-Nazis, he's worshipped at CODOH and IHR.
Where's the bad part? Did the ACLU accidentally let someone speak freely? Oy vey! Its like a second Shoah!
Still being found.
I don't care, as it's not relevant to the subject at hand.
They ground the remains and dumped the ashes into the river. We have photos showing them burning bodies, and here she cited a holocaust denier
Saying that this small smoke indicates a cremation of 60-70 corpses.
If that's the case then this big smoke indicates cremation of at least 300 corpses or so. Naturally we haven't found their ashes, so the Nazis clearly got rid of them.
8,000? That's a good round number. Any images of the actual findings?
sez you. let me ask about something else that's not relevant. your vaxx status, sir?
How do they know whose ashes they are and how they got there? Is there a scientific study of this finding?
If you have no ashes and no bodies then you have no proof of anyone's death, retard.
And the poltard raid thread has flamed out.
if your evidence doesn't meet my never demands for more detail that means i can dismiss it
wow that means you win the argument dude! the holocaust is a lie holy shit
Stop bumping it then. Idiot.
uh oh, shut it down
you don't want to answer?
Accuse someone of murder
Refuse to provide physical evidence of the murder
Complain when people rightly dismiss your accusation
You are very dumb.
So scienctific findings/research dont count based on your emotions? Thats neat. Oh btw Nazi scientists are the reason youre able to have internet. How far does your hypocrisy go?
the burden of proof is REASONABLE, not infinite when you don't agree with it
Because I just posted a photo of people being cremated in open pits outside of krema V. Even if you think the holocaust never happened then we should have ashes of those people. We don't. And it's pretty clear that they burned a lot of bodies there as aerial photos from different days show smoke coming out of those pits.
And mind you, they had 4 big crematoria and they were apparently not enough to process so many bodies so they started burning them outside.
There shouldn't be any question any gray area when presenting an indisputable fact, as you know.
nazis denying holocaust is as impartial as nazi scientists inventing some tech
how far does your mental gymnastics/actual retardation go?
"Show me physical evidence of a murder" is beyond reasonable. You are very dumb.
not it's not retard
en.wikipedia.org
person is missing
you some people who constantly talked about killing that person
you find (circumstancial) evidence that they were involved somehow
you find that they had the means and intention to murder them
you find that they made kill lists where they talked about the murder
you find eyewitness accounts that they did the murder
you find that the murderers did indeed confess to the murder
NOOOO YOU CAN'T CONVICT, WHERE IS THE BODY???????
OJ walked free because of retards like you
we should have ashes of those people. We don't
Even if you did, it still wouldn't prove them the ashes of murder victims; and especially not victims of homicidal gassing, as is claimed.
Ashes were found in Majdanek. But that was the smallest camp. There were also Polish post-war investigations in Treblinka and they saw the ashes.
Also, Poles found in 2019-2022 ashes of around 8000 victims of the Soldau camp. It seems like most of them were Poles, not Jews.
The Polish intelligentsia, priests and political prisoners were secretly executed there,[3] in addition to 1,558 patients from all the psychiatric hospitals in the district.
>person is missing
You don't know that. And if they are indeed missing, it could be explained by many things.
>you some people who constantly talked about killing that person
That doesn't exist.
>you find (circumstancial) evidence that they were involved somehow
That doesn't exist.
>you find that they had the means and intention to murder them
That doesn't exist.
>you find that they made kill lists where they talked about the murder
That doesn't exist.
>you find eyewitness accounts that they did the murder
Eyewitness testimony is worthless without physical or documentary corroboration, and generally unreliable as proved in many scientific studies.
>you find that the murderers did indeed confess to the murder
False confessions are extremely common. And a confession is not proof in and of itself.
>NOOOO YOU CAN'T CONVICT, WHERE IS THE BODY???????
Yes. Where is the body? Or, in this case, the more than 1 million bodies of people allegedly killed by homicidal gassing? Very reasonable demand.
Create a hostile environment in impoverished countries
Boast of better life in another country
Export migrants for cheap labor
Have tax payers support them
Happens in the US. You can blame the Jews for it, but the nobility of these countries take them in willingly.
It is funny that liberals in Europe forgot the cheap labor step and just pay them an existence check while their countrymen work.
I didn't do enough
- Oskar 'Should've gassed six million more' Schindler
Ashes are not proof of murder.
P.S. Majdanek is no longer considered a death camp. lol
Majdanek is considered a death camp. It was also a labor camp. It's one of the Operation Reinhard camps, and if those were death camps then so was Majdanek/Lublin.
holocaust.claims/majdanek/the-official-revisionism-of-majdanek/#:~:text=The%20current%20(11/16/2022)%20Holocaust%20Encyclopedia%20website%20mentions%205%20killing%20centers
Um sorry sweaty, but the USHMM disagrees. You need to keep yourself updated with the narrative!