Explain to me why leftists hate travis bickle

It's an extremely forced plot. It only works if you're autistic and don't know how society functions.

as far as sociopathic incel movies go, Nightcrawler mops the fucking floor with Taxi Driver.

But he's literally me

Yes, he was resentful towards the political candidate because a lady from his campaign dumped him. He then decided to rescue the girl in the most traumatic and violent manner possible. The social commentary is that he's seen as a hero, and yet he was seconds away from being a political assassin which would have meant he was villanized. The film was made in the era of a series of political assassinations, such as RFK.

If you want a real life Travis Bickle: Sirhan Sirhan one of the craziest fuckers ever.

I thought this was an actual person and I was wondering why I'd never heard of him so I look it up and it's a fucking movie character holy shit you guys are actual children arguing about this dumb shit

Kino imagry.

leftists think criminals are oppressed

Because he's a vigilante obviously. Leftist types see being "tough on crime" as fascism-adjacent. They seem to mostly believe criminals are made that way by society and should be rehabilitated, not killed.

That being said I don't really recall seeing them get that mad about Travis Bickle the way they do about certain other characters.

So essentially the Iris rescue wasn't for her, really it was for him a hissy fit because he thought he was gonna be some badass martyr and take down the politician and pussed out.

What board did you think this was?

yeah the only reason its unclear is because Scorsese wants to have his toxic masculinity cake and also eat it.

Didn't kill Palatine

C-C-CHUDS!!!

You worship an actual real life murderer. This little act isn't going to work anymore.

Well I have a special hatred of pedophiles. Epstein and trump for instance partied for years together on my island, there's pictures of it everywhere. Surrounded by young white girls. All the young local girls are black. Go look. There's collages and videos.
He didn't kill Palatine. It's not good to have pedophiles as Politicians.

The amount of vulnerable people being exploited by a health insurance assholes is astronomically larger than a pimpin' asshole. And the pimp was fictional.

They always have to push and insert their narrow dogmatic partisan political worldview front and centre, propagandizing everything relentlessly

Leftists have been doing this constantly for at least 20 years

Big Healthcare CEOs that deny care, defend it in court and depose patients (that have paid insurance) all for profit … have murdered millions. Monsters deserve to be killed.

And is intentionally vague and non-partisan in an effort to prompt debate and consideration of the art and its meaning.

TL;DR taxi driver isn’t your self insert, chud.

If the point is to provoke debate about its meaning then the chud interpretation is just as valid as any other and Travis Bickle is my self insert if I say he is.
TLDR you tried to have it both ways and played yourself

Why does [something I made up I want validated as a fact]?

Leftists do this constantly, they say their work is apolitical and open to interpretation but if you give it a chud interpretation they're like NO NOT LIKE THAT

Yes it was about his power fantasies, rather than her. He literally had her, and could have just contacted her family. He could have rescued her then and there, but didn't. He waited and then did it in the most violent manner possible, which owuld have also emotionally scarred her.

blah blah I love violence and murders and these people that do these things should be set back into the street without any consequences

I don't care. Make sure you buy more Luigi merch you homo.

Your interpretation doesn’t negate the creators’ artistic intent and is objectively no more valid than any other’s interpretation.

This is why chuds are stupid and uncreative. They can’t comprehend anything outside of their own ego and experience; total lack of self-awareness, empathy or objectivity. If it doesn’t directly reflect and reinforce their own politics and bias, their own self insert, it confuses them .. its “bad” … and anyone that likes it is “stupid” and “wrong”. chuds are literally brain dead NPCs

They don't. Why would they?

Leftists do this constantly, they say their work is apolitical

Just a straight up lie.
Leftist can't stop saying "HUUURRRR EVERYTHING IS POLITICAL" 24/7

and is objectively no more valid than any other’s interpretation.

This is exactly what he said you dumbfuck. Is this ChatGPT?

You don't talk to leftists to find out what they think. You surround yourself with other right wingers who tell you what leftists think.

Travis killed petty criminals as part of a macho savior fantasy and was seriously deluded

Luigi was a radical centrist normie with no impulse control that murdered one of the most evil men in the world because he had chronic lumbago.

Wild that this was probably the most meaningful night of the past 75 years, and it was done for the dumbest reasons

spared

he chickened out. a big part of the reason why he killed all the whoremongers was because fucked up his chance at killing Palatine.

glowniggers are still trying to paint Luigi as a "right vs left" thing

Nobody cares about that dead fat fuck. Lol.

You're the guy who says catcher in the rye is just a teenager complaining the whole time

Your interpretation doesn’t negate the creators’ artistic intent

Weren't you just saying that the creators artistic intent was to be deliberately vague and open to interpretation? Keep up with your own posting pseud

objectively no more valid than any other’s interpretation.

So it's no less valid, so it's true if I say it is.
Seethe and cope that I'm right you whiny pseud faggot

explain to me what a 44 magnum will do to a woman's pussy

NOOOOOOOO YOU CANT JUST OFFER A VOLUNTARY PRODUCT TO CUSTOMERS, YOU'RE EVIL!!!

retards

In 1989, Sirhan told British journalist David Frost: "My only connection with Robert Kennedy was his sole support of Israel and his deliberate attempt to send those 50 fighter jets to Israel to obviously do harm to the Palestinians."[3] Some scholars believe that the assassination was the first major incident of political violence in the United States stemming from the Israeli–Palestinian conflict (Sirhan carried out the attack on the first anniversary of the 1967 Arab–Israeli War), though it occurred at a time when the American public was overwhelmingly focused on the Vietnam War.[4]

He was crazy ,but also politically motivated. It wasn't directed at RFK specifically per se, just he saw an opportunity and went for it. The string of assassinations in the 60s led to a total overhaul of security practices, including Secret Service protecting presidential candidates.

That's why I call it crazy. It was as you described, politically-motivated impulse killing (like Luigi). The irony is that he probably turned the US down the path it's been down since. He killed *the* progressive politician of his era, got Nixon elected, and every single candidate after RFK has been more Zionist since him. The US could be a social democracy by now, and he guaranteed the slide to fascism.

These types aren't driven by any coherent political reasoning. They use the framework of political doctrine as a cover for antisocial behavior in real life. They desire to feel powerful or to lash out vicariously, rather than commit to ideals in a reasonable way because they're losers who experienced some form of trauma and decided not to heal by going to therapy. Their whole worldview is one big tantrum.

If I didn’t get the nice thing, then nobody else gets it either

Nietzsche talks about how the weak moralize revenge as a strategy born of weakness.

nigga its authoritarianism either way