Well this was kino and i'm convinced that if I want to keep watching good movies I have to look into the past instead

Well this was kino and i'm convinced that if I want to keep watching good movies I have to look into the past instead

Is it really so hard for producers to just do a fucking good movie? is it too much?

Times when you acted like The Sorcerer

file.png - 327x435, 302.59K

friedkin

Dude was so kino that he forced al pacino to get railed the ass by a different dude every night for "film"
lmao

Boring reddit movie

Fuck off, Nicolas.

want to watch sorcerer but already rembeber most of it. man when the fick arevwe getting a.i remix movies

lived long enough to see a.i birth but will be too old to enjoy its fruits

if I want to keep watching good movies I have to look into the past instead

Yes.

Is it really so hard for producers to just do a fucking good movie?

Just look into the production of Sorcerer.

Sorcerer as it was wouldn't be able to be made today due to union safety requirements. Nearly every element would have to be green screened CGI. It would look like Jungle Cruise and fare the same.
Bust the unions, save the kino.

I've pretty much given up on anything new, there's so much kino from 30s - 70s, why bother?

zerz.jpg - 2954x2959, 2M

It was filmed in the third world, ya fuckin dipshit.

It had to be funded by Universal and Paramount, both American studios. They wouldn't touch such a dangerous production today, even in the third world.

Producers don't make movies anon.

PS - watch the original.

I could watch a movie from before the 2000s every day for the rest of my life and not get through a fraction of the good stuff.

watch The Swimmer

some movies you might enjoy if you enjoyed sorcerer

the chaser
pusher trilogy
last of the mohicans
the edge
count of monte cristo
13 assassins
cool hand luke
one eyed jacks
the day of the jackal
blood diamond
children of men
outrage trilogy
violent cop
Hard Times
Harsh Times
The French Connection
The color of money
the driver
to live and die in l.a.
dirty dozen
thin red line
year of the dragon
chinatown
Le Samouraï
un flic
the american friend
Rififi
The Yellow Sea
The Seven up's
agitator
frantic
a prophet
the wailing
The Parallax View
Night Moves
Get Carter
Marathon Man
scanners
the verdict
manhunter
manhunter
hud
harper
ronin
the score
spy game
three kings
the good shepherd
the untouchables
dances with wolves
hyena
the seven samurai
Dead Man's Shoes
the dogs of war
carlos
state of siege
the way of the gun
henry portrait of a serial killer

some more movies:

apollo 13
clear and present danger
shane
Alatriste
a bittersweet life
Michael Clayton
Syriana
The Abyss
The Sphere
Buffalo Soldiers
sleepy hollow
Wolf
A History of Violence
Eastern Promises
Friday Night Lights
Draft Day
Ravenous
City of God
Stalingrad
nightcrawler
prisoners
13 Hours
coraline
bond movies
john wayne movies
get the gringo
The Duellists
Barry Lyndon
stargate
Papillon (original)
The Exorcist
Sicario
watchmen
outlaw king
brave heart
public enemies
The Man from Nowhere
everest
the crimson rivers
the house that jack built
a beautiful mind
angel heart
kursk
battles without humanity series
all the presidents men
oblivion
the stand (original)
the way back
The bridge on the river kwai
the game
miami vice
moneyball
war dogs
lord of war
the sum of all fears
gattaca
Bad Lieutenant
the current war
deadfall
the killing fields
the drop
apocalypto
the rum diary
The color of money

Refn doesn't even use Anon Babble, much less Anon Babble. I doubt he'd even know how to navigate and use a website that isn't X or Facebook. I can't even understand how Reddit works. There's no way he'd figure out an imageboard.

Sorcerer is fucking kino. My favorite film. Friedkin was a jewenius.

Fuck off, Nicolas.

good point

said the capeshitter

Well this was kino and i'm convinced that if I want to keep watching good movies I have to look into the past instead

yes? get a glimpse and you won't turn back

Is it really so hard for producers to just do a fucking good movie? is it too much?

yes, the entire industry is now built to do the opposite of that

Overrated. As are all of Friedkin's flicks. And there's plenty kino being made today. Don't meme yourself into "old good, new bad" thinking. It's not true when it comes to movies.

if I want to keep watching good movies I have to look into the past instead

wow
what a brillant

Name 10 (ten) kinos from 2024-2025. Not one will match up to Sorcerer, let alone The Exorcist.

You're not watching old movies, you're watching preselected old movies (classics). You're too lazy or stupid to do the selecting yourself. That's also the reason why you don't find any good new movies.

Furiosa mogs Sorcerer.

We won't know about Furiosa for another 30 years

kek

name one good new movie?

Puss in Boots: The Last Wish

Furiosa is dogshit, an so was Fury Road

It's not true when it comes to movies.

It's true all the times
there aren't modern good movies.
And when you start navigating somethign new it's normal to try what other people selected before, until you draw your own map

That just means you have no taste.

the proud brainlet chimes in

Both movies are theme park stunt shows with no substance. Pure slop for niggerbrains.

Cope
No, that means the opposite

No taste, as well as intellectually stunted. Not surprised by this.

You are using words you dont' understand lmao
Spoiler, saying "nu-hu" is not an argument. it makes only look you retarded

Okay. How about you then. What does substance mean?

one thing that impressed me about it is how great it looks. I watched it with a friend but he got filtered by the story, it is pretty damn cynical after all

it is pretty damn cynical after all

Typical Friedkin. LARP masculinity for insecure boys.

I'm not that anon, you should ask him.
"substance" in this case I guess it refers to those movies being completely devoid of characters, dialogue, human interaction and the likes. This makes them emptier than movies like Commando, which at least had people talking despite having no substance either

can't into symbolical meaning

needs extensive dialogue to acknowledge characterization

Yeah...

Ah playing with the meaning of words to justify you position. The landmark of low iq
Lack of interaction and characterization isn't "Symbolic meaning" or "visual storytelling", and subtext is not replacement for text.
Also the addition of the word "extensive", which nobody except you used, speciously changes the meaning of what is beign said by a landslide. "Show don't tell" doesn't mean what you think it means. You tell what you need to tell, and show what you need to show. And nowher it implies that it means lack of characters, interaction or story.

"Yeah" indeed

Lots of words just to provide further proof you aren't as smart as you think you are.

Nu-hu

no reading comprehension

emotional reaction

ad hominem

Concession accepted
We are really done here

I love how you pretend you offered a single intelligent thought in this "conversation".

This movie is an extremely overrated meme movie that is worse than the original in every single way. But nobody watches the original because its black and white which means normie redditfags like you wont watch it and the poster doesnt look as cool on your social media when you tell people its your favorite movie because you only like old movies (not older than the 70s tho).

movie called sorcerer

it's just 120 minutes of this

I've seen both before you even heard about any of them and you're full of shit, retard.

gaysed

yeah but cruising is top notch kino

CORRECT. 2 STARS. TERRIBLE REMAKE. MISFIRE. BORING. BAD EDITING. IMPOTENT MENS WELL AGREED UPON SAFE CHOICE. CHUCK NORRIS IS BADASS. RYAN REYNOLDS IS HANDSOME. THE EMPEROR WEARS NO CLOTHES

images (4).jpg - 200x200, 4.55K

Correct. Someone said it was awesome and boys with no personalities latched on.