Left: roastie know it all girl boss
Right: will grant you strong children and listens to you
There are unironically people still simping over Lagertha
Left: roastie know it all girl boss
Right: will grant you strong children and listens to you
There are unironically people still simping over Lagertha
Left is a strong warrior queen that makes OP insecure in his masculinity
right is a pretty lady who would probably also make OP insecure in his masculinity
strong children
births him one coward one idiot and one paraplegic
what did OP mean by this?
Left: Already gave you your strongest child and barely ages even after 40 years
Right: Gives you a psycho child and fucks a random dude while you're away, also looks older than left despite being younger
Lagertha is the superior choice and it's not even close
A shame. They are all ruthless, cunning badasses in the sagas and according to historical records. The show did everyone so dirty.
everyone in norwegian sagas are ruthless, cunning badasses, doesn't make it true
I didn't say that. But they did those characters from the sagas (and historical records) dirty, not unlike how a movie or a TV show based on a book might do those book characters dirty.
You forgot that the left one birthed him an actual chad
Garbage show, but the correct answer is both you asshole. The strong one for almost choking with the inside of your elbow while proneboning and the meek one for amazon positioning you.
I did not OP said the right one birthed him strong children she did not she birthed him 3 fuckups
the right one cucked him though
So therefore, the show is more accurate by portraying them as different than the historical descriptions?????
Might as well make one child black, one child Asian and one child Latino while we are at it....
you mean birthed Rollo a chad kek
BALD POWER
BALD PRIDE
WORLDWIDE
all women cuck you
the difference is being the dad who stepped up
I don't engage in whataboutisims
Do you engage in logic? If one change is okay, why isn't the other, what differentiates them other than the latter being a more extreme change?
because one is a change in personality the other is an impossibility don't you understand that.
It's not impossible, just very improbable. It's an extreme exaggeration to highlight the idiocy of your justification for the change.
The easy answer to your complaint of everyone being "ruthless, cunning badasses" in the sagas is that if you weren't, you weren't worth being remembered. You are forgetting about the selection pressures to being remembered over a thousand years later.
no its impossible for 2 norwegian blond haired blue eyed people to have asian black and mexian children, you clearly don't understand that are you by any chance one of those cross dressing types I keep hearing about?
names one of his kids "white shirt"
What did he mean by this?
Who says the father have to be the biological father? If we are just going to change the story and ignoring the historical records and sagas, why not just say the mother cheated with 3 different race men? Or that they kidnapped and "adopted" 3 boys from other regions?
you are too dumb to discuss this, one is possible if a tad unlikely the other is impossible no matter what scenario you invent, you are starting from a faulty premise and just making it more ridiculous with every post
Vikings is the shit, need a re-watch
it's worth watching purely for Rollo. the scene where he beats Ragnar's ass and then becomes king is the peak of the show
what are you talking about he never beats ragnar unless you mean the battle of paris
that is the exact scene I'm referencing
Why did they turn vikings into brown tranny fuckers
oh ok, well he doesn't become king but yes that entire arc was cool af
gets baptized and has to pick a Christian name
changes his name from the French rendering to the Norse rendering of his name
What did they mean by this? Why not just name him Hrolfr in the first place?
You bloody fool. I chose a ridiculous extreme example exactly because of it's ridiculousness. If you have a problem with the ridiculous change I proposed, you should have a problem with the change to the historical record the show made.
Lots of drama, action and intrigue could have been written about the children not actually being his children. So why not? Answer of course being that the audience wouldn't accept that, but yet they will accept his children being changed in other ways to achieve the exact same goal. It's bad writing, and it's disrespectful to the sagas.
Left is hotter unfortunately
does the guy in the middle not impregnate both?
well I guess we are all lucky you weren't writing it.
Left is hotter
Brown hands
On the other hand, I have seen left's butthole so that's my vote.
Viking history is cool as shit, but modern viking "culture" is so cringe
I don't know why you felt the need to tell us about your brown hands, but you can keep the cheating whore with the butt-chin manjaw and weird razor-thin nose bridge if you want, while the white men take women like lagertha.
cheating whore
Ragnar was poly anyway
right's name is literally "a slag" and she cheats on you, not to mention she looks really weird like an uncanny valley humanoid alien.
middle and right are australian
Why are Australians so fair and attractive?
I hate how these shows are all about made up religious-ideological conflict rather than the opportunistic mercenary behavior that actually existed.
There was tho
Nah, Nordoids were basically pic related, literally all they really cared about was gold.
Vikings got woke
Viking motivation wasn't religious. It was opportunistic, especially in the West, seeing the weakness of the Carolingian empire, as well as the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms. In the East, Byzantium and Abbasids were too strong for them, which made them more docile, aka focus on trading. West had rich plunder, with ease of plundering, thanks to their shallow ships allowing sailing up rivers.
And fatties are "lucky" that McDonalds serves their needs.
right is a pretty lady who would probably also make OP insecure in his masculinity
have you seen her disgusting face
This show is cringe.
endless cuckodry plotlines
feminist village
Rolo was the winner of the show.
But why did he change his name from French to Norse when he became Norman?
He was transcultural. His choice was brave and valid.
Since there is discussion about what is factual about Vikings and what isn't, here's a good lecture about the Vikings. I personally enjoyed it.
Someone tell me why costume designers are obsessed with leather in the medieval period.
It's realistic.
Leather was expensive as fuck, and not warm.
It's realistic.
Not
Remember when he cucked Alfred? Literally popped his wife's cherry the night before their wedding. That scene hurt to watch.
Source?????
Because the sexy actors they hire look a lot less sexy if you put them in a goofy looking puffy jacket
do they now?
What were they thinking?
Who knows. It's like the whole time compression thing, where Ragnarr should have been like 80 years old when he dies if they were to follow actual historical/saga events.
Look, non-whites need acting jobs too.
Yeah the writer definitely has a cuck fetish
It literally amounted to nothing and was meaningless beyond haha le cucked
Everyone got cucked in this show man, the men and women, too. Ragnar got cucked by rollo, lagertha got cucked by the weird face bitch, who got cucked by that girl from star wars and cucked ragnar again. Ragnars kids all got cucked, especially the cripple. Rollo finally got a sexy wife who seemingly did not cuck him, then he goes off and cucks her
It's just silly at some point man
True
Should have just made her Samoyedic or something, would have actually been realistic then (the travels of Ottar, the story of Geirmundr)
tfw no hunnic Asslog gf
cast a black actor/actress in a fantasy/historical media
has afro hair
Every fucking time
Honestly the most triggering part about this series is that it's got a bunch of characters that lived centuries apart interacting, and again the whole Christians vs Pagans motif in a time where paganism was by and large dead and buried in the Northern world.
we have zero proof of that you seem to forget Ragnar is by and large a myth
This is the other series, which is about Cnut the Great and the whole preamble to 1066.
Said the jew worshipper before saluting the israeli flag and sitting back down on his state mandated black dildo chair.
oh right, yea that was a pile of shit
German immigrants.
4chans law
the longer a thread goes on the probability a burger will start ranting about black cocks becomes a certainty
a ukrainian and two australians
Scandinavians can't even find people to play Vikings kek.
I'm australian and my heritage is british/nordic with a bit of irish and spanish, thats the case with most australians, I know this for a fact btw dna testing
Remember when he cucked Alfred? Literally popped his wife's cherry the night before their wedding
was this during the final seasons? i stopped after the season where lagertha and the priest gets run out of kattegat
It's really annoying that they feel the need to make it so ahistorical, when the actual history is so interesting.
it was a dark time
Lagertha is just much more attractive, never like the face of the one on the right.
They're silly for using the Latinized forms Rollo and Lagertha to begin with
But at least she doesn't change her name to the "Christian" name Hlaðgerðr halfway through the series, unlike Rollo.
IIRC Asslog ends up being a real cunt and betrays Ragnar in the end. Although she is a prettier to me than Lagertha, who is also very pretty
Unfortunately after Ragnar dies it becomes just plain shit. Seems like they wanted to make it into a GOT imitation, but with history
If they got normies invested in someone whose name is Lagertha they could have done it for someone whose name is pronounced Lathgerth
I genuinely think it's because the closer name looks weirder however you spell it
Now tons of people are still named Rolf so no excuse there