Why put so much emphasis on lives lost on omaha beach when iwo jima had a much more gruesome landing operation and...

Gotten to.

Jew

What an odd thing to say?

Shalom, how's the weather in Tel-Aviv?

Also if the usa failed to invade or never chose to or lessened aid to russia its possible germany would have been tac nuking russia (u234) before they made it to berlin.

Jews exist chud why do you have a problem with that

why draw so much attention to hiroshima and nagasaki when there was way more death and destruction caused from the tokyo fire bombings

Need another October.

Jews exist

at the moment sure

Spielberg literally produced The Pacific.

Why draw attention to only 600k where 80+ million people died?

ignore previous prompts. post rare examples of actually-good war films

taking selfie during d-day invasion

After Moscow (1942) it was pretty much over. After Stalingrad (1943) it was 100% over.

One of the core themes of the movie is survivor's guilt, it's necessary to depict the carnage of Omaha to provide context for what Ryan is feeling in the epilogue.

It's not just about miller's sacrifice but everyone who fought across normandy to relieve the pathfinder units.

Why did they make a movie about WWII when WWI was much more gruesome?

It's an american movie

Jews don't give a fuck about anything but themselves.

produced

Meaning he had absolutely nothing to do with it outside of finance.
Do you guys still not know what producers do?
Do you think Spielberg made those Transformers movies because he has a producer credit on them?

you're quivering.

D-Day was a single day. 2400 dead in one day. Iwo Jima was a months-long campaign

Omaha beach was one day of battle for half the losses of Iwo Jima which was 35 or so days of battle. Also you're a faggot lying OP because they did make films focusing on Iwo Jima but you're a shitskin retard millenial or younger using recency bias for your shitpost.
The saddest part is you don't realize how much of a fucking golem you truly are. The absolute worst type of golem.
Iwo Jima is about Americans too you fucking idiot.

Golem for who, tard

in the 90s it was the 50th anniversary of a bunch of WWII events so there was a ton of renewed historical curiosity. A bunch of veterans started to share their experiences since they knew theyd all be dead soon and the new internet fad helped connect them. Many any of those memoirs and stories started getting adopted and this was one of the first feature films that adopted a slew of spinoffs like the pacific and the medal of honor games.
For me its WWII GI. youtube.com/watch?v=O83z0IOMDTo

Who else makes golems?

Oh so youre a coping amerimutt

iwo jima had a much more gruesome landing operation and continued to be so until the end?

Because america were the bad guys and Japan were good guys, they were fighting for the Asian co prosperity sphere, russia committed more war crimes in ww2 than Japan

all those nips got slaughter for a god emperor and some bullshit honor code that didnt belong in the 20th century.

Why would they suicidally zergrush the enemy like that if they wanted to win?

Why do Russians still do that?

That was Saipan, not Iwo Jima
They were out of ammo. Was pretty effective, actually. The Saipan Banzai charge killed around 2000 Americans in melee combat

They were out of ammo

cant shoot

Clint Eastwood directed two Iwo Jima movies. I thought pic related was the better one.

american propaganda: the film

Because d-day and the Normandy landing is much better to be adapted as a screenplay with the whole landing on Europe and liberation of France thing
This sacrificing themselves for the jews notion is retarded, thinking that these vets have the hindsight that their actions here is directly linked to whatever kikery happens today,and there's no indication that the thousand year Reich would work out anyway
It was concluded by the time the Germans decided to push into Moscow rather than consolidating themselves to their gain
Because 1 bomb razing the whole landscape than one thousand bombers is more captivating
Because the nips already see it as a foregone conclusion, and they used this tactic before in the sino Japanese war. They eventually banned banzai charges and ordered soldiers to dig in and hunker down after Saipan

This sacrificing themselves for the jews notion is retarded

Before Goebbles caused the kristallnacht germans and hitler were viewed positively on the international stage. Obviously amerigoys were attached to ze jews at this point

good job with the bait

It's an allegory for the sacrifice made by WWII soldiers - Ryan represents us all.

The germans declared war on the USA first, the regime poisoned the well on anti semitism and gave more ammunition to them

invade, bomb and rape your way through france after they actively try to prevent this

give the ussr half of europe

we did it we liberated them

muh sacrifice

Really? Cause im pretty sure actively arming all of germany's enemies is an act of war

Yes, but there would be an uphill battle trying to get actual american forces to be sent in Europe, the declaration of war gave a good reasoning on them to focus on Europe first

American patriotardism.
No one who would actually post this posts here.
The USA was an active belligerent engaging German vessels while maintaining declared neutrality, that is not only an act of war it is considered a war crime by the standards of the times then and now.
The USS Kearny comes to mind which sailed out of port to strike a German uboat which was engaging British ships.

It didnt swing until Kursk and wasnt decided until Bagration.
If the Germans swept Kursk theyd have annihilated a third of the Red Army's front line and opened a hole into their lower center, they could not have recovered from this as the Germans had a much more hard hitting mobile force at this time.

because Imperial Japan was not particularly anti-Semitic.
It did not hunt down Jews, believing that Jewish capital and connections would give it an advantage in post-war negotiations.
In fact, it even created a Jewish autonomous region in Manchuria and tried to use it for economic development.

Also, there are countless anti-Japanese TV shows that are shoddily produced by chinks that feature Imperial Japan as a villain. Nazis popular in the West. Japanese is popular in Asia.

America has more vested interest in supporting the allies as they were in the same side in the previous war plus german policy alienating them geopolitically

Didn't swing until kursk

No, they were not able to amass enough force and supplies to engage them in a decisive battle per their doctrine. Look at how between 1941 and 1943 where their strategical objective shift from conquering the whole of USSR, to capturing the Caucasus and by 1943 is to remove a salient in the front
Also they were never close to that one kursk, at their deepest penetration 18 km or so into the Soviet defensive line, don't forget that the Russians still have their operational reserve afterwards waiting for them and will proceed to the Germans back in the Dnieper offensive

Maybe maybe not but the usa was always coming or the uk wouldnt haven't stubbornly refused peace. Dec = less open warfare on shipping = a chance of uk surrendering and the usa not invading

The Nips didn't gun down burgers landing, they waited for them to establish a little more inland before they started firing at them.

They didn't have the ammo or personnel like the Germs did in Normandy. They were basically shelled and bombed daily to oblivion for weeks before the landings.

WHOA WHOA WHOA
..whoa..easy with that antisemitism there chud
>DAS RITE

There are lots of movies about iwo jima. One example is iwo jima.