I know who Ayn Rand is, but I don't get it
I know who Ayn Rand is, but I don't get it
Feed
The windows are all open to suggest the children have escaped from their classes, as Objectivism values individualism over conformity to an almost sociopathic extent and so they'd learn to ironically reject their own attempted education.
The school's architecture reflects the style of Howard Roark, the protagonist of The Fountainhead
I would tell you to look up her philosophy of Objectivism, but it's dumb. So watch this instead.
youtu.be
no
try again smartass
The joke is that Objectivism is awful to teach a child because it values being a self-centred piece of shit
The school teaches independence in a harsh manner and Ayn Rand is a bogeyman for modern establishment leftists. Clearly the modern left parenting technique of encouraging whatever crazy shit your kid does until they become an utterly rudderless freak controlled by drug addiction, hedonism and transvestite nonsense has worked out much better for the society.
Ms. Sinclair[1] runs the Ayn Rand School for Tots. Her brother is Llewellyn Sinclair.
What in the ever hell? Supposedly she's the SISTER of the guy who was directing the theater production marge was in. This is never mentioned in the episode.
But why are all the windows open?
It would be much better if they adopted more of a conservative view where education begins at home, and in every anus of every alter boy would would undoubtedly know not to question god or the church.
her philosophy was that of a spoiled child
Moral particularism.
For a summary of Ayn Rand's philosophy, please watch "The Incredibles" written by radical objectivist Brad Bird
gen x college faggots loved to shit on ayn rand
I never read her gay books, but she's hated by the right people
die antwoord lost a bunch of fans when ninja posted that he loved atlas shrugged
I'm reading "Candide" by Voltaire and find it hilarious.
Preschools stereotypically teach kids to share. Ayn Rand's philosophy is that everybody should be selfish. That's literally it.
Il faut cultiver notre jardin
Did you read Pale Fire? If so how did you like it?
Was he saying you don't mow another man's lawn?
Rand and Nathaniel Branden told O'Connor and Barbara Branden that they had fallen in love with each other. Rand and Branden asked that their respective spouses give the two of them time with each other for a romantic but nonsexual relationship; during the conversation, Barbara Branden and O'Connor briefly objected, both raising their voices and saying, "I won't be part of this", but Rand eventually secured their agreement, Barbara Branden recalling that Rand could "spin out a deductive chain from which you just couldn't escape". In November, Rand and Branden invoked Rand's value theory of sexuality to insist that their spouses also give them permission to escalate the affair to a sexual relationship. O'Connor assented, and he vacated the apartment twice a week for Rand and Branden, often going to a bar.
Campbell observes that "on the personal side, it is Frank O'Connor who still eludes every biographer" of Rand. Rand called O'Connor her "top value", and she said he was the model for her fictional protagonists and "as near to" being Fountainhead protagonist Howard Roark as "anyone I know". Others who knew O'Connor aver that Rand mischaracterized O'Connor and that in reality while he was witty, kind, and chivalrous, he was emotionally restrained and very passive. Literary scholar Mimi Gladstein summarizes, "there is not much public evidence to corroborate Rand's" claims about O'Connor. Robert Sheaffer concludes that O'Connor "was a very generous and decent man" but "was no John Galt". Unlike Rand, O'Connor had little interest in books or the ideas she enjoyed thinking about, and he was kind and insisted on politeness. An acquaintance later reported that during their time in the San Fernando Valley, Rand actually considered divorcing him out of frustration with his lack of intellectuality and sexual drive. Despite this tension between them and despite his melancholy, O'Connor consistently supported Rand and never left her.
what the fuck
Selfish people love to share, they just charge a premium for the convenience.
insane bitch grows bored with beta husband and wants to get plowed by chad
What's confusing you?
That she came up with a fictional superhuman that she tried to project onto every single man she was with until it fit her delusion enough. Ayn Rand was fucking nuts
Not confusing at all, shit's textbook black pill. Even a pretty boy actor chad loses in the end.
You guys are alright.
I did read all 1000+ pages of god damned Atlas Shrugged. Fucking ubermensch paying each other a quarter every time they bum a smoke.
Atheists, leftists, and homosexuals rape kids.
Vaush defends pedophilia and child pornography.
Mao fucked a 14 year old girl.
Atheist "intellectuals" in France supported abolishing the age of consent.
en.wikipedia.org
Foucault raped children
Charles Fourier wanted to fuck children.
The MAPs movement was started by atheists.
Socialized "public" school teachers are far more likely to molest their students than catholic priests.
Numerous atheists have been outed as pedophiles.
NAMBLA was started by atheists.
Atheists defended Joseph Rosenbaum, a child rapist.
John Money, the father of modern transgender movement, was an atheist who sexually abused children.
Alfred Kinsey was an atheist pedophile hero.
The famous atheist John Maynard Keynes frequently traveled to third world nations to have sex with boys.
streamable.com
streamable.com
streamable.com
twitter.com
youtube.com
bostonreview.net
I read Atlas Shrugged twice. I actually like Ragnar and Francisco as pulp novel characters, but Dagny and Reardan and Galt are just such obnoxious dickweeds.
Queer theory, another product of leftism and atheism (noticing the pattern?), is likewise an advocate of pederasty.
youtube.com
soul
soulless
Atheists, leftists, and homosexuals rape kids.
Why are you Christfags like this? You've been like this since the 90's. Just acknowledge that child rape is a huge problem in the church you fucking retarded faggots.
The largest pro-pedophilia organization in the world was created by an atheist and leftist activist.
child-raping atheist starts screeching and crying when his lies and projection are exposed
Classic.
It should be noted that while childhood sexual abuse by Catholic clergy has received extensive media coverage, childhood sexual abuse by teachers and others is also a serious problem. Charol Shakeshaft, who has done extensive research on the problem of sexual abuse of students by teachers, recognizes the difficulty of collecting solid data on sexual abuse; but using available studies, she estimates that “the physical sexual abuse of students in schools is likely more than one hundred times the abuse by priests.” According to Shakeshaft's research, even when abuse was reported to school officials the offenders were not reported to the police. In her study of 225 cases in New York, “none of the abusers were reported to authorities and only 1 percent lost their license to teach.” A recent article in The New York Times documented abuse—including sexual abuse—of the developmentally disabled in group homes. Even when abuse was uncovered, perpetrators were allowed to continue working at other facilities.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
edweek.org
theguardian.com
nj.com
I actually like Ragnar and Francisco as pulp novel characters
I'm compelled to agree.
Also I like the guy that blew up his mountain... Wyatt? Wyatt's Torch?
Who is more likely to rape a child, a priest or a teacher?
Per capita, of course.
a pretty based novelist so the simpson jews hate her
A public school teacher.
What's your next cope, you child-raping atheist?
Atheists are the least represented in pretty much all crimes since they don't believe some magical demon will magically take away their faults if they succeed in some religious trials and maintain proper superstitious rituals, while you can't even stop your top cardinals from raping kids.
Calling random jews atheist doesn't magically fix that problem.
HELP I'M BEING OPPRESSED
every single retarded rural Christfag since the existence of MTV
Kill yourself, literally, you pedo-protecting sack of sin.
Priests are teachers which is why they are in the perfect position to rape all the kids they rape.
you pedo-protecting sack of sin.
But enough about Orthodox Jews in the state of New York.
Yes it is. When he sees Marge has Maggie with her he suggests the daycare. That why it's funny when it hard cuts to the school and she looks and sounds like her brother
So you don't understand that teachers can also be religious, you don't have to work for a church to be a member of a child raping religion?
Or you forgot the story in the bible of Jesus being arrested with a naked little boy with him?
A (You)? HAHA! Here we aim to develop the (You) within.
www2.ed.govrschtstatresearch
How are you this fucking retarded and gullible?
The atheist homosexuals who infiltrated the church during its liberal seminaries era in the 70s/80s, and committed the sexual abuses, are dying out.
Ayn rand is a repulsive noseghoul who endorsed a pedophile (william hickman) raping and killing a little girl.
she scribbled diary notes in her brand-new language that formed a story she called The Little Street. Its protagonist, Danny Renahan, is modeled on a real-life Los Angeles murderer, 19-year-old William Hickman, who strangled and dismembered a girl in a kidnapping-for-ransom gone awry.
In her notebooks, Rand makes a hero of both Hickman and the fictional Renahan, who murders a church pastor instead of a child, and extols the killers’ beautiful souls, which rise and set without a trace of “social instinct or herd feeling.”
Oh shut up you fucking retard, every single rural redneck fucking retard salivates about fucking his daughter or cousin. Tranny and furry porn is overrepresented in conservative counties The people obsessed with degeneracy have always been the conservatives and they are bitter assholes out of guilt for their degeneracy.
Religious people are superior to atheists by every social metric.
Atheists are mentally retarded.
Atheism is a mental disease.
Atheists are just spiteful mutants throwing a tantrum at their Creator because they're failures:
The mutant says in his heart, “there is no God”: the rejection of collective religiosity centred around the worship of moral Gods is associated with high mutational load
archive.vn/aNzyf
Atheists ought to be barred from public life altogether, for the good of society.
Religious people are healthier, happier, more social, stronger, more charitable, basically better in every way than gaytheist basement-dwelling neckbeard losers who failed at life and are seething about it.
Atheism is a suicidal delusion for weak, spineless, spiteful pussies.
This is what fat rural 50 year olds tell themselves to cope with being at the end of their lives without ever having achieved anything
What about genocide? Hitler, Mao and Stanin were all athiests.
pedo-protecting sack of sin.
That would be atheists/leftists.
See .
But who's right?
Euro hours are pure cringe.
every social metric.
Except of course criminals, prisoners, and hospital patients since theists are far more over-represented in crime and prison statistics and tend to think their god will forgive them for things like overindulging and giving themselves heart disease.
Atheism is a mental disease.
No, believing in invisible demons is literal schizophrenia, you retarded schizo.
stupid atheist pedo can't read
Pottery
The bible literally has god commanding people to commit genocide regularly and the entire point of creation and jesus's sacrifice is to build up to a second coming that climaxes with apocalyptic genocide. The inquisition and crusades were also genocidal.
Tranny and furry porn is overrepresented in conservative counties
Who did you get that info from?
Profligates like (You) belong on a cross.
Atheists murdered over 100 million people in the last century alone.
No one's been a bigger plague on humanity than atheists.
Atheists have committed the worst atrocities in history.
This is because they're sick, mentally-ill freaks and broken people.
Public schools push atheism, secularism, and leftism.
Or you forgot the story in the bible of Jesus being arrested with a naked little boy with him?
There is no such story.
Atheists like you are addicted to lying because your entire insane ideology is built on lies.
But who's right?
Magic sky daddy
it was all me
Why are atheists so stupid and gullible?
I liked her book Anthem
But you leave her to go long form and she invariably starts hacking in a rape scene, typing one handed
So your best defense of all the genocidal murder committed by christians is by calling for someone to murder anyone who questions christianity?
Indoctrination which is what all schools do these days. That's it. Bye, faggot.
The most famous atheist in the world defends pedos.
The largest pedo organization in the world, NAMBLA, was founded by and is run by atheists.
No, god is on their money and public schools literally force kids to pray to a national flag and the god who created it.
LMAO
Google said link
Second option is the Holocaust Survivor database
Ahahaha
Correct, over.
Genocidal Christians are less annoying than (You).
en.wikipedia.org
You should at least read the book if you are going to pretend like your life revolves around it.
every single rural redneck fucking retard salivates about fucking his daughter or cousin
source: my fellow predditors told me
isn't that similar to one of the houses Howard Roark designed in The Fountainhead?
I'm not religious, but I'll take your word for stories in book being equal to actual genocides that happened.
No, those countries you mentioned were largely run by jews with their superiority complexes, you are probably going to blame slavery on white atheists too, despite them being the ones who fought and died to end slavery.
The inquisition and crusades were also genocidal.
No they weren't, you stupid gullible redditard lmao.
The Crusades were a defensive war against the Muslim invasion of the Levant, prompted by a request for aid from the Byzantine Empire.
The point is that christianity sees genocide as a good thing because the christian god regularly calls for genocide, the very fact that anon implied genocide was a morally bad thing means that anon is anti-abrahamic.
public schools literally force kids to pray to a national flag and the god who created it.
Why are atheists such shameless liars?
unintelligible atheist copebabble
So am I a turn the other cheek cúck or a genocidal monster?
Make your mind up already
defensive
No, defensive is not when you go marching into foreign lands, that is offensive and the crusades were definitely a series mobile offensive attacks rather than holding a defensive position against a land being seized by muslims.
Stalin, Mao and Hitler were Jews? If anything the genocides committed by the US were the result of Jews controlling a country.
Catholicism is easily one of the worst cancers that ever happened in this planet
Stalin, Mao and Hitler were Jews
Yes.
I know that passage. It's not what you described.
Do you feel ashamed that you're a shameless liar? At all? I guess not, since you're an atheist.
Says the retard who is too retarded to know the pledge of allegiance invokes god.
Sometimes offence is the best defence, you have no idea how ruthless Muslims are
You mean jewish atheists and non-jewish atheists.
The common factor being atheism.
You are a self-contradicting narcissist like every religious person.
I'm the anon that mentioned athiest genocide, I'm also not religious, or an athirst. Athiests are just the other end of the horseshoe to religious zelots, with a retarded certainty of something they can't prove.
Not an answer, you can't have your cake and eat it, not with me anyway.
How convenient that now that I have provided the passage directly you are suddenly the highest level expert on a passage you just said didn't even exist.
No
Yes, you stupid redditard. The Crusades were a defensive war against the military invasion of Christian lands by Muslim forces.
apholt.com
Atheism is easily the worst cancer that ever happened in this planet.
Why is this thread just people accusing each other of being genocidal? Do any of you actually care whether there is a God?
No, you are thinking of anti-theists.
But we can definitely know that the bible was fraudulent and since that is the entire basis of your theism, everyone knows you are a fraud too.
it wasn't real atheism
The passage YOU described doesn't exist. You just made it up.
Typical lying atheist.
christian land
Funny because I can say it was Roman's defending their land when they persecuted christians too so
GOD
I'm sure I'd feel the same about it if I were a kike, imagine a whole religion that basically invalidates yours.
AHAHAHAHA. It's even more effective on PC! What exactly is "unintelligible" about saying I googled the link, Jewboy?
You didn't even read your own source, those historians don't even agree, they are having a debate and most of them say it was an attack in disagreement with the author of the page.
I've said multiple times I'm not religious you fucking retard.
I didn't make anything up, I described the naked kid that was with jesus when he was arrested as described in the gospel mark, and you didn't even know that was part of the story.
I don't know who Ayn Rand is, but I get it
You don't have to be religious to derive your theism from the bible, you just have to be naive and historically illiterate.
Western country industrializes
woooow this is hecking based, now we don't need peasants farming anymore!
China industrializes
reeeeeeeeee this is genocide, you should have left the peasants to farming
holding a defensive position against a land being seized by muslims.
That's literally what it was, you stupid fucking retard.
Do you not know when Islam originated and how it spread through military force? The Muslim conquests? The Arab-Byzantine wars? The Seljuk Turks? The call for aid at the Council of Piacenza?
You're a complete moron who's way out of your depth. Stick with your fellow gullible dumbfucks at reddit.
The pledge of allegiance isn't mandatory, dumbfuck.
And it's not even a fragment of the curriculum.
All the gods being actively worshiped in this world directly called for genocide because they were all the demonic machinations of the world's past psychopaths.
No, Mr. Cry-out-as-you-strike-other-people, they weren't simply holding a defensive position, they were actively attacking muslim held lands.
The pledge of allegiance is not part of the teaching curriculum at all, its a daily ritual, and there are numerous states that mandate its daily recital by law.
While I agree with you that it isn't legally, some teachers get offended. I think it was 6th or so grade when one dude didn't say the pledge and a teacher sent him to the office. Shortly after the principal came over the loudspeaker and demanded we stop being disrespectful as this was the height of the Afghanistan War aka the War on Terror. I'm from Texas and we also said the Texas pledge every morning. Honor the Texas flag; I pledge allegiance to thee, Texas, one state under God, one and indivisible.
most of them say it was an attack
Lying little atheist rat:
the panel was three to one in favor of viewing it as a defensive war.
Why are atheists such shameless liars?
And even the only holdout acknowledges it's because he has a very narrow definition.
a self-contradicting narcissist like every atheist.
FTFY
No, you were lying since you said that they all agreed it was defensive instead of them obviously having a debate where they weren't all in agreement and not even agreeing that it is a valid premise in the first place.
You're wrong (as usual for an atheist).
None of that is self contradicting, since nothing is something defined by the value 0 and even theists necessitate 0 when doing modern math and explaining the laws of substance and value.
I didn't make anything up
Yes you did, you lying atheist rat.
I described the naked kid
There is no "kid", you lying atheist rat.
What are you even schizobabbling about, you stupid atheist?
NTA but why have you not commented to the proof that your link is somehow associated with Jew shit? Almost like a large amount of people who use said link also visited the US Holocaust Memorial site?
be ayn rand
come up with moral framework emphasising higher-order rational selfishness
aka "if I'm a dick to people, I might get what I want in the short term, but people will not deal with me and I will lose in the long term, therefore I should be a good person for my own benefit, and a community of rational individuals will be stronger than a community of suicidal altruists"
stupid people make fun of you forever for being utterly correct
altruism now so suicidal white altruists are facilitating their own genocide
The Bible is legitimate. Many times dumb atheists like yourself claimed it was fraudulent or various accounts and places in it were fictitious, archeology confirmed them. Woops.
You have to be mentally ill to be an atheist.
muslim invaded lands
FTFY
They were defending Christian lands against the Muslim military invasions.
>aka "if I'm a dick to people, I might get what I want in the short term, but people will not deal with me and I will lose in the long term, therefore I should be a good person for my own benefit, and a community of rational individuals will be stronger than a community of suicidal altruists"
Isn't that literally just Enlightenment era philosophy
No, I referenced the naked kid that was with jesus when he was arrested.
There is no "kid"
A certain young man was following him, wearing nothing but a linen cloth. They caught hold of him, but he left the linen cloth and ran off naked.
There certainly is one in the bible, no matter how inconvenient it is to your current argument and your false view that jesus wasn't clearly pedo coded.
No, you have to be mentally ill to believe in invisible demons, case in point see your first point about the dozens of times noah's ark has been found by some schizo jew only to be forgotten and found in a completely different place by a completely different schizo jew the next generation.
It's funny because you kikes are at a much higher risk of schizophrenia.
haaretz.com
You're on a Taiwanese basket weaving forum. Go fuck yourself, KIKE.
Archeology supports basically nothing of the bible
For me? It's when I ask a Christian about proof for what's in the bible, and he says that another part of the bible confirmed that the prophecy was fulfilled
They proved that Moses parted the Red Sea? Jesus of Nazerath was no fucking doubt a real person but that doesn't mean he was what he claimed. He was just a man leading a cult, not the Son. Not that I have anything wrong with religion as long as you control yourselves and don't try to pushy your shit on me. I actually encourage it as a form of social engagement to better the community. You are so fucking small-minded.
you said that they all agreed it was defensive
No I didn't, you lying little atheist rat.
YOU lied when you said
most of them say it was an attack
when the article says
the panel was three to one in favor of viewing it as a defensive war.
The pledge of allegiance is not part of the teaching curriculum at all
Exactly.
there are numerous states that mandate its daily recital by law.
No there aren't, dumbfuck.
thefire.org
The catholic church was founded by an atheist pedo?
NTA
Lol. Try rephrasing your copebabble.
NTA but I personally experienced it being mandated. not by the state but by the school. You are naive to think public education follows the laws set forth for them however I am sure it's a very small number of public schools that do this.
It means "not that anon" you absolute retard. Phrased better for you? Now give a serious response.
The opposite is true. Archeology confirms the Bible.
Of course you'd lie, since you're an atheist. Atheists are liars.
washingtontimes.com
breakpoint.org
armstronginstitute.org
Correct: There is no "kid".
Typical lying atheist rat.
Bible mentions some shit that actually happened and is proven true
This means the entire fucking Old and New Testament are completely true
You know how lies work, eh Jew? Sprinkle in a bit of truth and people eat it up.
this
also its cool to see an actual simpsons thread with discussion now instead of that retard sperg ice cream spammer killing the thread with his shit forced neme
You have to be mentally ill to be an atheist.
No I didn't
Yes you did, you only offered it up as proof because you thought it proved you point, but it didn't, they were having a debate, and it couldn't be three to one because one of them didn't even think it was a valid premise (since one side would see it as offensive while the other might try to make it seem defensive) and they were only talking about the first crusade to begin with not the crusades in total like you implied.
God just exists because he does okay?
BANG
Bullet passes throw your skull
Death to you.
None of those news sites are archeological published studies about the bible
this existence is just a blip in a much wider aether that doesn't follow our standards of time, space, perception, etc. that's genuinely all just chemicals in our brain: like how you see visible light but you're not taking in ultraviolet or something.
there's certainly a 'before' and 'after' when it comes to life, but that doesn't mean there's a God, specifically. really arbitrary idea.
Throw
FUCK. Through. I am drunk on the blood of Jesus.
but that doesn't mean there's a God
Yes it does, Bible says so
Exactly.
Exactly what? They expect you to have memorized it already and recite it every day, its not something they teach, its a daily ritual to support teaching through the mandated subservience of students instead?
There are, dumberfuck.
thehill.com
Why are you baiting like this? Do you really crave attention so much?
You mean besides the one that ran off naked while jesus was being arrested?
In 1964, Nathaniel Branden began an affair with the young actress Patrecia Scott, whom he later married. Nathaniel and Barbara Branden kept the affair hidden from Rand. As her relationship with Nathaniel Branden deteriorated, Rand had her husband be present for difficult conversations between her and Branden.[111] In 1968, Rand learned about Branden's relationship with Scott. Though her romantic involvement with Nathaniel Branden was already over,[112] Rand ended her relationship with both Brandens, and the NBI closed.[113] She published an article in The Objectivist repudiating Nathaniel Branden for dishonesty and "irrational behavior in his private life".
lol
No, you have to be mentally ill to pray to invisible demons.
DSM has multiple entries about hallucinations, but says nothing about not believing in other people's obvious hallucinations.
At least I can hold nothing in my hand, schizo, you will never touch a god.
You can't, actually
Mr. Incredible is based and completely correct. Celebrating mediocrity is for faggots.
Yeah, saw that too. For better or worse, these sorts of chicks end up on their asses as well sooner or later once chad gets bored. There's always a betabuxxer to fall back on though.
I can actually unless you are a retarded narcissist who thinks you hold the whole atmosphere instead of it holding you.
Yes, I know you're pretending to be another person, retard. You illiterate dumbfuck.
Now try phrasing your schizobabble as a coherent argument. Go on.
Your own Wokepedia link says nothing about any "kid". It also says nothing about pedophilia. Instead, it says:
A certain *young man* was following him
The wearing of a single cloth (Greek: σινδÏŒνα, sindona) would not have been indecent or extraordinary, and there are many ancient accounts of how easily such garments would come loose, especially with sudden movements.
It looks like this is a lie you just regurgitated from a random Anon Babble post, because you're a stupid gullible idiot (as a typical atheist).
Once again, atheists are shown to be liars.
Its called an acronym, retard.
No he is a huge kike for telling parents they shouldn't appreciate their kid. Not keeping score at soccer or whatever is celebrating mediocrity. Celebrating that your your child isn't fucking dead and actually progressing through life is not.
No. NAMBLA was.
The largest pro-pedophilia organization in the world, NAMBLA, was founded and is run by atheists.
the Bible comes from the same source i'm talking about. the closest you can get is psychedelic drugs, which broaden your understanding but it's only a drop in the water.
the wider, outer reality is just so alien to us. even the concept we're some discrete entities with our own separate minds is weird. so what, you get to Heaven and you're still John Smith? nah m8.
The word kike was born on Ellis Island when there were Jewish migrants who were also illiterate (or could not use Latin alphabet letters). When asked to sign the entry-forms with the customary "X", the Jewish immigrants would refuse, because they associated an X with the cross of Christianity. Instead, they drew a circle as the signature on the entry-forms. The Yiddish word for "circle" is kikel (pronounced KY - kel), and for "little circle", kikeleh. Before long the immigration inspectors were calling anyone who signed with an "O" instead of an "X" a kikel or kikeleh or kikee or, finally and succinctly, kike.
atheist is a drugnigger
what a surprise
disingenuous, shameless goalpost-moving
I accept your concession, you lying atheist.
The bible also said "god" sent a bear to murder kids so
I'm not though and you have ironically proven yourself to be the schizo.
A young man is a type of kid, dipshit, it doesn't need to say pedophilia when it directly talks about a naked youth running away from a crime scene, pedophilia isn't even a bad thing to abrahamic religions since their god didn't make any commandments about it and he specifically knocked up an underage mary by modern standards.
it's a metaphor
Just like Jesus then cause he definitely didn't exist
Yes you did
No I didn't, you lying atheist rat. Link to the post where I said "they all agreed it was defensive".
YOU lied when you said
most of them say it was an attack
Typical lying atheist rat.
I know what the acronym means, you stupid illiterate retard. Work on your reading comprehension, you moronic fuck.
You said the "Bible was proven true" and I with no doubt agree that some of the Bible is true. But there proof Jesus was the Son, Moses parting the sea, Noah's ark (though I do believe there was a massive flood event) etc. If I wrote a book saying you are a faggot and then mentioned Pompei would you automatically believe it because Pompei was prove to be a true historical event?
I don't care about your mental delusions and fictitious personal experiences, you dumb atheist.
NTA but congrats for looking it up after seething about it for a while
It's an abbreviation by the way, not an acronym
Literally an Atheist here and Jesus definitely existed. Was he the Son of God who turned water to wine? No. But Jesus of Nazerath is agreed to have factually existed by most scholars.
I accept your concession.
You seem to care a great deal about fictitious things.
stupid atheist can't even write properly
pottery
by most (((scholars)))
Take your meds, Jewboy.
he definitely didn't exist
Proof?
I'm not though
Sure thing, bud.
It's physically impossible to return from the dead therefore Jesus never ever existed
t. the anon who mindlessly worships a book with thousands of translations so you can constantly pick and choose your truth based on convenience
I don't understand why you would be so defensive against me basically implying Jesus was a cult leader.
Oh, Kant, you never had children?
I beg to differ.
Your philosophy gave birth to Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, and Hitler.
Fucking rekt. Kantian bullshit came after Rousseauian bullshit, which lead to Marxism, and mass amounts of genocide and death.
All Objectivism has done is created cringey lolberts and "sovereign citizens". Kant destroyed humanity for centuries, so that's something, I guess.
So you accept that there isn't any universal agreement that it was purely a defensive war as you claimed and that by definition they had to aggressively attack a foreign land "to defend themselves"?
Okay, nigger.
Jesus definitely existed
Lots of Jesus's have existed, just none actually fitting the biblical narrative.
murder
Not murder. Murder means unlawful killing.
All life belongs to God, who is the author of life, to do with as He pleases.
kids
Not kids. Why are atheists always lying about what Biblical passages actually say? Why are they so addicted to lying all the time?
Zealot
Which I agree with aside from the fact that there was a Jesus from Nazerath.
He would have returned in his apostles lifetime like he said he would if he actually existed.
Also if biblical god exists, you should be able to say his name and invoke a divine flame like Elijah did to prove he is the one true god.
That's a non sequitur.
And also an unproven premise.
Vespasian was the cult leader, jesus was the imminently returning prophet he helped invent to have a claim to divinity.
A young man is a type of kid
You're a confirmed retard.
Go back to reddít with your fellow retards.
There are lots of jesus's from lots of places, its a fairly common name, just none with a biography that matches what is in the bible.
atheist retard logic
They really should start teaching logic again in schools.
Also an unproven premise
Care to give it a go? You seem so confident. Though I partially agree with you.
GIWTWM
No, you are a retard if you don't know that a young man is younger than a full grown man and that by jewish standards you are a man at the age of 13.
universal agreement
I didn't claim "universal agreement" on anything, you lying atheist rat.
YOU lied when you said
most of them say it was an attack
Typical lying atheist rat.
No he is a huge kike for telling parents they shouldn't appreciate their kid.
Overpraising your child for doing fucking nothing is how to "appreciate their kid".
You are completely retarded. You should praise your child when they do something exceptional or work hard to achieve something, or for doing their chores and being good. Not for doing literally nothing except moving from 4th to 5th grade. You do that automatically. It's like getting trophies for losing a ballgame.
Fallacy fallacy, Jesus fake existence is a physical impossibility and nothing will ever change that
That would offend christians and their magical thinking too much.
none actually fitting the biblical narrative.
Prove it.
none with a biography that matches what is in the bible.
Prove it.
Aside from there being a Jesus born in Nazerath?
Jesus 's
You can't even use proper English. You don't put an 's after an s. Fucking Hell, man. It would be Jesuses.
Are you claiming all scholars are rabbinical jews, and that rabbinical jews worship Jesus?
I didn't claim "universal agreement" on anything
Then I accept your concession, there is no historical agreement about your claims that all of the crusades were simply defensive.
Typical lying atheist rat.
No, most of them did admit it was an attack, only 1 of them really tried to make the attack out to be purely defensive, the author doesn't even say it definitely was defensive by the end he said "It’s certainly no secret that I believe the First Crusade can be seen in the context of a defensive war" and "can be seen in the context" is quite different than saying it is definitely a defensive war..
Objectivism is for kikes.
I'm neither jewish nor a mentally ill atheist.
Wrong. It would offend atheists and their fallacious thinking.
When did you graduate? Going through the public school system IS hard work. It is fucking soul-crushing and the fact that their son managed to not shoot up the entire school is to be celebrated. Why are you so against positive reinforcement? You're Gen X and was beaten with a wooden spoon by your mother while your dad proceeded to drink whiskey in the other room until it was his turn with the belt, huh?
fallacious
t. the fallacious trinitarian anon who believes one god is three gods
Doubt after that link. Maybe you're not. You just have similar objectives with Jews. To subversive, divide, and conquer.
So suicide is always bad and a sign of mental illness except when your demigod specifically does suicide by cop?
Going through the public school system IS hard work.
Yeah, during High School. That's about 4 out of 12 years. Elementary School is easy as taking a diarrheic shit. It's automatic and simple.
It is fucking soul-crushing
Elementary school was not "soul-crushing", you tard. That only really starts during Middle School, usually around the 7th or 8th Grade. Middle and HIgh School social cliques, on the other hand, WERE soul crushing, but those don't exist until well after 5th Grade.
Like the 99 genders atheists believe in? No, I don't. That's why I'm not an atheist.
NTA
Pretending again? Atheists are so pathetic.
looking it up
Stupid atheist schizo.
It's an abbreviation by the way, not an acronym
You called it an acronym, you stupid atheist dumbfuck:
And yes, it IS an acronym, you stupid atheist rat. Picrel and en.wikipedia.org
Atheists are so fucking stupid.
Things like "graduation" from one school year to the next is nonsense as he says its mediocrity youre supposed to do that. If your child gets a good end of year report then praise them and reward them but some kind of ceremony for completing school is bizarre
itt no1 understands objectivism
A young man is a type of kid
I'm just going to laugh at you, at this point.
Stupid atheist dumbfuck, lol. No wonder you have to be mentally retarded to be an atheist.
Jesus was the Son of God.
When did you graduate? Did you actually have to go to a school that is based if NYC filled with niggers, spics, drugs, and general assholes? Niggers were shooting dice at my school in 6th grade. I drop kicked some nigger chick who wouldn't stop slapping me for no reason and I got in trouble for it in 5th. I graduated from high school in '09 when I was 17.
Jesus believe in that nonsense too, everyone is a child of god.
He even said to cut off your dick because it would help prevent sin.
Atheist coper
Why are you so against positive reinforcement? You're Gen X and was beaten with a wooden spoon by your mother while your dad proceeded to drink whiskey in the other room until it was his turn with the belt, huh?
I'm a Millennial (1988), and I've seen the effects of your "giving kids constant validation and affirmation" bullshit. It's turned 3 generations into drooling narcissistic fuckwads who can't even handle an attempted rape scene in Star Wars, and get triggered by words like "female" and having retarded "gender reveal parties" for the mentally ill.
Yes to a society where a 13 year old is considered a full grown man, a young man is definitely a kid.
Do you really think they referred to 18 year olds as young men in the BC years rather than 12 year olds? Did you even look at the painting that accompanies the article?
I only believe in two genders and mock trannies. I'm more right than left according to political spectrums. The only reason I am so "left" is because I support environmental protection.
No, I don't care to make your argument for you. Make it yourself.
Fallacy fallacy
That's not what "fallacy fallacy" means, you atheist moron. You're literally too stupid to use that term properly.
Jesus fake existence
Jesus's existence is accepted by every scholar with credentials in the subject.
Sorry, you dumb internet atheist loser.
These are fringe cases and a loud minority. Talk to anyone your age and ask them how they feel about said scene and 99% will not give a fuck.
I would never kill another man unless it is a genuine war. Even then I would probably hesitate because I believe all life is precious due to the fact that when it's over it's over. There is no Heaven. We don't get to watch our family members jerk off from above.
I accept your concession
I gave you no concession.
there is no historical agreement about your claims that all of the crusades were simply defensive.
I never said there is UNIVERSAL agreement, no matter how much you continue to lie about that like a typical lying atheist rat.
There does not need to be universal agreement on something for it to be true.
YOU lied when you said
most of them say it was an attack
when the article says
the panel was three to one in favor of viewing it as a defensive war.
three gods
I don't believe that, and neither does any orthodox trinitarian.
Also, you don't seem to understand what "fallacious" means. You're literally too stupid to have this conversation.
They cite them.
And if I link one, you'll jump to a new cope.
Did you actually have to go to a school that is based if NYC filled with niggers, spics, drugs, and general assholes?
That's not because of the average school curriculum, or the teachers. It's because of the leftist retards that don't enforce the law on "minority urban communities", leading to shitloads of violent crime and broken families, because they're afraid of being called "racist".
These are fringe cases and a loud minority.
Maybe so. But the fact we are seeing more and more of this degenerate narcissism tells me parents, increasingly, aren't properly disciplining their charges.
They let them think they are perfect, give them constant approval and adoration, turning them into spoiled assholes who care only about social clout.
Time and space aren't "all just chemicals in our brain". That's just a stupid shibboleth phrase you've mindlessly parroted from other atheist redditors, who are just as dumb as you are.
I gave you no concession
You did, you admitted there is no actual historical consensus that the crusades were purely defensive.
I never said there is UNIVERSAL agreement
Which is exactly why you conceded by admitting your retarded claim about how offensive campaigns are actually defensive is not actually based on any historical consensus.
There does not need to be universal agreement on something for it to be true.
You didn't just say it was true, you provided a link and implied all those historians agreed what you were saying was true, but they didn't, they were having a debate themselves and one of them didn't even agree on the premise, so what was the point in providing a link that disagrees with your claim other than the fact you only read the title and didn't actually bother reading the text of the article.
our perception of them are though, like how we form memories.
t. have been stuck in some weird, horrifically uncomfortable 'time loop' just on weed. the real answer isn't anything supernatural: it was just a psychoactive drug affecting how my brain was forming memories. absolutely awful, like a record skipping. not smoking again.
He would have
That doesn't prove he didn't exist. That's a non sequitur.
he said he would
No, he didn't. Atheists love to lie about what Biblical passages actually say, I've noticed.
if biblical god exists, you should be able to say his name and invoke a divine flame like Elijah did to prove he is the one true god.
Another non sequitur.
No, you obviously don't understand what fallacious means if you think saying 1=3 isn't fallacious.
You don't really know what you believe when it comes to the trinity because every argument for a trinity is fallacious nonsense that require something to be something it is not.
That's not because of the average school curriculum, or the teachers
I once called the group of black kids who beat me daily and called me cracker "black boys" while they were beating me. I believe I said something like "I'm not scared of you black boys" then they proceeded to beat the shit out of me harder. I got sent to the VP, who was black, and she told me I just couldn't comprehend what my words did to them. I am not making this shit up.
You just have similar objectives with Jews.
To worship Jesus as God?
subversive, divide, and conquer.
That's what atheists and anti-Christians do.
Atheism is a mental illness. Stop coping.
Jesus believe in that
Atheists are habitual liars.
He even said to cut off your dick because it would help prevent sin.
Atheists are habitual liars.
The fact that you have to constantly lie all the time to keep up your ideology should make you pause and reconsider.
That doesn't prove he didn't exist.
It does.
No, he didn't.
Yes he did. Mark 9:1; 13:30; Matt. 10:23.
Fake christians love to say nu-uh about things that are in the bible that are also immoral by modern standards or that didn't actually happen in the time frame prophesied.
They let them think they are perfect, give them constant approval and adoration, turning them into spoiled assholes who care only about social clout.
While I see your point I cannot imagine celebrating three or four graduations (Kindergarten, 5th, 8th, and 12th) does so much mental damage to your child that they think they are perfect. Did you feel that way? Did your parents even pay you on the back when you graduated elementary?
Theism is schizophrenia with friends.
It's sad to watch you flail like this.
Atheists really do end up tying themselves in knots with their constant lying.
her best contribution was Rush lyrics
Most "christians" on this site are just contrarian faggots
You just have similar objectives with Jews.
To worship Jesus as God?
Literally what. Now you are just being blatant with your baiting. Jews believe Jesus was just a man. A heretic. Even Muslims believe he was a prophet though not the Son.
I got sent to the VP, who was black, and she told me I just couldn't comprehend what my words did to them. I am not making this shit up.
Holy fuck. That's retarded. You literally said nothing offensive. Is calling them "black" now racist, or something? What should you have called them? Dark Roast Coffee boys? Burnt toast boys? Asphalt boys?
Atheists are habitual liars.
Jesus literally says to "hate your family" in order to "love him". He's a crazed cult leader, not God. He's insane hippie who got what he deserved: a long stick and short sick. He was literally just old-school Jewish Jim Jones.
Baby boomers were way worse in all those regards anyway.
The only lie in this chain of discussion is that young man isn't a synonym for a kid.
Most atheists support trannyism.
You're an atheist so you're automatically delusional, anyway.
I would never kill another man
Yes, you would.
I believe all life is precious
No, you don't.
when it's over it's over
That's a tautology.
There is no Heaven.
False. There is a Heaven.
We don't get to watch our family members jerk off from above.
Atheists always have sick, perverted, rotten minds, I've noticed. And it constantly shows up in their vocabulary. You're just a manchild redditor.
clueless
So did jesus, he literally said to chop of your dick if it causes you to lust.
That wasn't a "kid". Atheists love to lie.
Projection: The Post
How does it feel knowing prisons are overflowing with narcissist like you who think they know all the secrets to the universe, but just end up dying in jail clutching a bible?
Now
This was in like 2004, my man. That's my whole point about the public education system being Hell. I started to act out (basically just say fuck you although in more words) and got sent to an alternative school with metal detectors and cameras in every room. I STILL got the shit beat out of me by niggers I didn't even know. My parents came to said alternative school, saw the video of niggers just walking up and punching me for no reason, and pulled me out. The Mexican principal insisted I must have done SOMETHING to them and even through me in ISS "for my own protection." A truancy officer came by months later and my dad told him to fuck off and never come back. I then proceeded to go back to the original middle school and aced the placement exam despite playing WoW for the last whole year. True fucking story and I have told it multiple times on Anon Babble
Atheism is schizophrenia.
Then why is he always described as a kid, what age did they consider men to be vs what age do modern societies consider men to be and why are all the paintings about the subject like the one in the wiki depicting kids?
False. There is a Heaven.
Your proof is...? I'm absolutely sure that Jesus was a fraudster, but I do believe there is a higher power. Just not some filthy hippy cult leader who wanted to be proto-Charles Manson.
Atheists always have sick, perverted, rotten minds, I've noticed.
That's a reasonable point, though. Same with God supposedly watching us all the time. They'd all be watching us shoot goo all over our hands. And read our thoughts about sexy anime girls, or that one girl in your 6th Grade class when you got your first stiffy. Or do they just turn it off for those parts?
No I wouldn't unless given the specif stipulations.
Yes I do. Earnestly. Just leave me alone.
You're a fagology.
Nope.
Stop pretending like you never played with your dick.
Athiesm is the exact opposite of believing invisible demons talk to you in your mind and allow you to telepathically influence the universe, you silly schizo.
anon needs a religious reason to not kill
yeah sure, we'd all be pushed under the right circumstances. bit worrying it's 'the rules' that are stopping you. my anti-killing stance is 100% secular.
Was Ayn Rand actually wrong? Why does she get everyone's titties in a bunch? Is it because collectivism is so deeply ingrained into society, even among self-avowed "nonconformists", that her ideas are inconceivable to most?
the goal is to not sin, if you can't control your urges then you should remove your the thing that makes you sin
Matthew 5:27-30
but of course you'll try to refute because you believe it's the women's fault for causing the man to commit the sin
You did
No, I didn't, you lying atheist rat.
YOU lied when you said
most of them say it was an attack
Typical lying atheist rat.
your retarded claim about how offensive campaigns are actually defensive
I made no such claim, you lying atheist rat.
3 out of 4 of those historians agree with me that it was a defensive war.
you provided a link and implied
Your extrapolation is your problem, not mine, you atheist dumbfuck.
a link that disagrees with your claim
It doesn't disagree with my claim, you atheist dumbfuck. It supports it. Most of those historians agree with me.
This was in like 2004, my man.
Yeah, I can see that. My high school in 2005 was filled with insane retards on the Oregon coast. Those kids were fucking nuts. It was legitimately scared while on the school bus. And those shitblisters bullied me, too, while constantly yelling obscenities like they were in a mental asylum.
Yes that is what I said, Jesus said you should be a tranny if it will help you follow his rules, he was one of the first major religious leaders to get on the tranny bandwagon, you silly aspiring tranny.
You're just a run-of-the-mill stupid atheist druggie.
You have said nothing insightful.
It isn't.
didn't even look up the passage to double check ngmi
could've named an unrelated passage like Revelation 9:1–11 and you'd be none the wiser
So you're admitting Jews don't have the same objective. They reject Jesus.
YOU lied when you said
Its not a lie, though read the actual article instead of just the title.
3 out of 4 of those historians agree with me that it was a defensive war.
No they didn't. 1 of them definitely said it was an attack, 1 didn't even agree on the premise.
Your extrapolation is your problem, not mine, you atheist dumbfuck.
No the problem for is is that I actually extrapolated things from the article instead of only reading the title.
It doesn't disagree with my claim,
It does, if it supported your claim, you wouldn't have cope about how you never said there was universal agreement in that article.
It's always funny to watch the stupid copes you atheists come up with.
thegospelcoalition.org
The are the paintings of the scene using children?
How old is a jewish man at that time and how old is a kid now?
No he didn't. Atheists love to lie.
You just spew lie after lie, without a care in the world.
atheist claims Jesus supported transgenderism
Why do atheists love to lie so much? It's like an addiction to them.
He isn't.
Atheists are addicted to lying.
She basically just went full retard in the opposite direction of collectivism.
Not to mention Atlas Rising also seems to be her personal clit-lit. Pic related but for her type.
One joy how you repeat yourself so much because your want to be recognized. So attention deprived. Get a girlfriend, anon. Don't fuck her until you're married I don't give a fuck. But stop with all these insane shit posts, please.
Imagine how nuts they are now that hard drugs have been legalized in Portland. It got so bad they said lmao nevermind and rolled back the law because feces and needles littered the streets. My brother lived in Portland before the decriminzation then moved back for a bit when our mother died. When he went back he was a huge anti-racist, pro-drug, etc. He got back and basically said "Yep. That city is doomed. I can't even recognize it from a few years ago."
atheist reads text mentioning a young man wearing a cloth
his mind instantly jumps to having sex with said man
Atheism correlates with homosexuality. Really makes you think.
Your proof is...?
Jesus said so.
I'm absolutely sure that Jesus was a fraudster
Your proof is...?
That's a reasonable point, though.
I'm glad you acknowledge that you're a mentally-immature manchild predditor who never grew up. That's a start.
Yeah which is funny because you're a like through and through. Maybe not literally but morally and theologically you are a kike. Spinning and weaving political bullshit to break apart the masses. Wanting everyone to be a sheep who follows Jesus JUST LIKE MUH BIBLE. You are scum and a danger to humanity as a whole. While I do not mind religion, and even encourage it as I have previously said, you are dangerous. You would not hesitate to take lives. You would propegate your ideology across the entire world. You. Are. Scum.
No I wouldn't.
Yes you would.
Yes I do.
No you don't.
Nope.
False. There is a Heaven. Heaven is real.
your dick.
The fact that you're always thinking about dick says it all. You're a mentally-broken, defective individual. As always for an atheist.
Atheism is a mental illness.
Rand is just Nietzche for brainlets
lying atheist rat
lying atheist rat
lying atheist rat
atheist dumbfuck
atheist dumbfuck
You need to get better insults, you cultist fruit loop.
It's always funny to watch the stupid copes you atheists come up with.
Jesus is not demanding that you literally hate your family. He is using hyperbole to illustrate the steep cost of following him. Any prospective follower must be glad to give up everything, to love him unreservedly—to sell all in order to have him as your highest treasure (Matt. 13:44–46). Our affections for Christ must be of such an intensity and quality that, by comparison, all other loves seem like hate.
Lol. Literally proving my point. You need to love the Dear Leader more than every other thing in existence, even your own life. That's a fucking cult leader. Congrats, you played yourself.
atheist starts hallucinating quotes
Typical atheist mental illness.
my anti-killing stance is 100% secular.
It is 100% irrational.
Ayn Rand would say if you can't raise a kid yourself, you're failing at life. The idea that some socialist construct like pre-school would help nurture children? No way. This is a failure of self and purpose. Why have the children?
The word kike was born on Ellis Island when there were Jewish migrants who were also illiterate (or could not use Latin alphabet letters). When asked to sign the entry-forms with the customary "X", the Jewish immigrants would refuse, because they associated an X with the cross of Christianity. Instead, they drew a circle as the signature on the entry-forms. The Yiddish word for "circle" is kikel (pronounced KY - kel), and for "little circle", kikeleh. Before long the immigration inspectors were calling anyone who signed with an "O" instead of an "X" a kikel or kikeleh or kikee or, finally and succinctly, kike.
tl;dr kike means anti-Christian. Sounds like you're a kike.
He did though, you need to read the book before you pretend it is the basis of your morality.
It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to be thrown into hell.
You would propegate your ideology across the entire world.
Yes, I would. And so would you.
You. Are. Scum.
Aww, butthurt atheist. Gonna cry?
He is, you just have to look at the pictures in the wiki to see him depicted as a kid, but since people with imaginary friends are addicted to lying, you will never accept the truth.
streamable
twatter
jewtube
I ain't clicking that shit, nigger.
Oh you made us easy for me.
Nope
Nope
Seething
Why do want to drag all of humanity down to your shitty outdated theology? You're pretty much mad and in denial that maybe the 10 commandments were not issued from God but basically human instinct. You're upset that an Atheist might follow them more than you. Why? Because you're a fucking hypocrite who has been exposed.
i like your style. lil
beep
boop.
forgot the poetry term. it's good. keep it up.
bullshit to break apart the masses.
You mean like jesus who called himself a sword because his only goal was to split apart goy families and nations?
Its not a lie
It IS a lie, atheist rat. You are a liar. You claimed
most of them say it was an attack
when the article says
the panel was three to one in favor of viewing it as a defensive war.
No they didn't.
Yes they did, you lying atheist rat. This is a verbatim quote from the article:
the panel was three to one in favor of viewing it as a defensive war.
how you never said there was universal agreement
Correct, I never said that. Lying atheist rat.
he thinks priests from MASSACHUSETTS were "conservative"
yeah she's wrong, she spent too much time obsessing over individuals like most women she lacked high time preference
They aren't.
Jesus said so.
That's not proof of anything except you being gullible.
Your proof is...?
All of his "miracles" being easily replicable frauds or made-up horseshit created centuries after he died.
I'm glad you acknowledge that you're a mentally-immature manchild predditor who never grew up.
At least I'm not a sterile bag of grey cultist jizz. You also just agreed with my comment. If they are watching us *incessantly*, why aren't they also watching caress the one-eyed serpent?
Oh now I know for a fact you are baiting. I submit. You clearly have far more time to waste than I do. Good job, anon. Everyone clap.
He isn't.
You're a typical lying atheist with mental illness. A defective freak.
Correct, you should love the Creator more than the creation. Duh.
Stupid atheist dumbfuck. Atheism is literally the enemy of logic.
You're butthurt because I instantly BTFO your stupid nonsensical kike line.
tl;dr kike means anti-Christian. Sounds like you're a kike.
Just because someone doesn't want to be confused for being a Christian, doesn't make them "anti-Christian", you fucking loon.
No, Jesus didn't advocate transgenderism.
Atheists love to lie.
I am guessing you didn't actually read the thread but I am Atheist and believe Jesus was basically a cult leader. Read.
split apart goy families and nations
That's what atheists do.
Don't care.
Oh. Oh. I get you now. You're saying divide and conquer is justified because Jesus did it so you're just carrying on his spirit. Yeah you're a piece of shit too. Sorry but your ideology is so retarded that I couldn't even grasp it at first.
The article also says
Yet as academic historians we naturally have many qualifications and reasons for our positions. Consequently, and in light of the interest expressed by our colleagues, I asked the panelists if they might submit a brief summary of how each of them thought it went.
And their summaries weren't as simple as you made them out to be since one of them didn't even really agree with the premise and another said it was informal and not up to academic standards.
This is a verbatim quote from the article:
That leaves out the yet... and all the nuance.
I never said that.
Which is why I accepted your concession since its not actually agreed upon by historians as you originally claimed it was.
See . Religious people are superior to atheists by every metric: health, longevity, charity, sociability, generosity, mental strength, etc.
What a dumb thread
en.wikipedia.org
They are, its directly in the wiki link about the passage that you didn't even know existed until I gave you the source.
First time? Sniff my fingers.
it was always going to be a stupid argument, but who'd have thought it took this religious flame war twist?
334 posts too. amazing.
He advocated cutting your dick off to make yourself closer to god, that is definitely advocating the same retarded bullshit modern people call transgenderism even if gender wasn't yet in vogue as a term.
Then why are you mad they are doing jesus's work for him?
That's not proof of anything
Yes it is.
you being gullible.
Projection. You're being gullible.
All of his "miracles" being easily replicable frauds
Prove it.
made-up horseshit created centuries after he died.
Wrong. Predictably, you don't know the first thing about biblical texts.
Typical lying atheists parrots lies about things he knows nothing about.
Atheists thrive on spreading bullshit.
jizz
See? Atheist starts thinking about semen, unprompted.
Atheists are just mentally-ill, defective, dysfunctional immature freaks.
Don't forget that theists have the largest number of criminals in prisons, so they are superior at being criminal scum too.
confused for being a Christian
Fix your reading comprehension, you illiterate ape.
Prove it.
Its already been proven since his final miracle was to return a generation after he died before all his apostles passed away which never happened given that all his apostles are long dead.
Correct, you should love the Creator more than the creation.
No, I shouldn't. He's a needy and petulant bully who murders people for retarded shit like laughing at old people or not sharing the same sky daddy prayers. True love doesn't require such crazed and single-thought devotion. That's madness and narcissism. Your "God" is just a TikTokker with supposed omnipotence, who got his ass thrashed by Chemosh one time.
The only reason you believe in Yahweh, is because an insane zealot King of Jerusalem (Josiah) went on a murder spree of other religions for no other reason than youthful bigotry and greed.
No, Jesus didn't advocate transgenderism, as you falsely claimed.
Atheists love to lie.
Don't pretend that circumscision is "cutting your dick off." Is it a horrible, inhuman practice? Absolutely. But you're just throwing sticks into the fire with absolute nonsense like "Jesus said you chop off your dick." Stop poisoning the well.
They aren't.
But they are doing your work for you.
He advocating cutting off your dick so you could ascend to a higher level of being, he just didn't call it gender, but it is the exact same horseshit.
Your lying and coping in circles doesn't change the fact that you lied about most of those historians agreeing that it was a defensive war.
Most of those historians agree the Crusades were a defensive war.
End of.
It wasn't just circumcision though, he said if any body part could lead to sin, you should cut it off to avoid going to hell.
Fix your reading comprehension, you illiterate ape.
Where in your post does it imply them not wanting to sign a "X/Cross", means that they automatically hate Christians (not that they don't have centuries of reason too, mind, after all of the forced conversion, mass rapes, expulsions, pogroms, and being forced to be banker slaves)?
They aren't.
And take your mind out of the gutter, you desperate atheist freak.
No he is advocating for removing certain nerves from your dick so you focus less on sex and more on God. Which J agree is still wrong but I do not appreciate the bullshit you spout.
No, jesus said himself he is the sword whose job is to cut apart nations and families, so anyone helping with that is doing jesus's work by definition.
Its already been proven
No it hasn't.
his final miracle was to return a generation after he died
No it wasn't.
They didn't agree with you either, so you still lied by presenting that link as proof that historians agree with you when its still debatable and they don't even agree with each other.
Its not my mind, its the story and the artwork associated with it that has existed since before I was even born.
So just don't commit adultery? Only schmbags would have to worry about this saying. I agree with him though. Adultry should lead to have your dick removed or your vagina deformed. You are a slight on society if you do so and will ultimately lead to what we have right now.
No, Jesus didn't advocate transgenderism, as you falsely claimed.
Atheists love to lie and twist and distort.
Yes it has, Yes, he says so in Mark 13:30 that he will return again to fulfill his final prophecies before the next generation comes to an end.
Jerking off is adultery according to jesus, even simply thinking about adultery is adultery.
No, you're just an idiot who can't read properly:
gotquestions.org
More likely, you just parroted some stupid shit you read on Anon Babble without even reading the text.
Typical gullible atheist retard, mindlessly parroting lies.
Yes he advocated cutting your dick off to ascend to a new being, its the exact same as transgenderism with a bit different wording since the concept of gender didn't yet exists, the same self mutilating self-denial bullshit at the end of the day.
Just because I agree with him on one part doesn't mean I agree with the rest.adiltery has destroyed the last couple generations of families. You know damn well this is true.
Yet you can't even refute it yourself and you can just nearly parrot some stupid shit you read on gotquestions.org.
So just don't commit adultery?
Jesus and Paul also wanted everyone to be celibate, because the "promised time" was going to happen within their lifetimes, so there wasn't any need to have kids. So, Jesus was also anti-child.
No, I shouldn't.
Yes, you should. You're just illogical and irrational, like every atheist.
He's a needy and petulant bully
You're just venting, not making any logical point.
murders people
Wrong.
Murder is unlawful killing.
All life belongs to God.
True love doesn't require such crazed and single-thought devotion.
You wouldn't know what true love is if it hit you in the face, you dumb predditor.
According to your biblical standards if you have ever jerked off you are just as bad as an adulterer and should have cut off your dick instead.
Stop lying, you stupid little atheist retard.
Most of those historians agree the Crusades were a defensive war.
That supports my claim that the Crusades were a defensive war.
End of.
Again. I don't have to agree with Jesus on every fucking point.
So who gets to decide which voices in whose head counts as the real god that gets to command lawful killings instead of just schizos with blood lust?
((()))
No, it supports your ability to cherry pick random academics who agree with your premise, but its not widely agreed upon by historians, so its not really a historical fact, its just something you have cherry picked because of your religious bias.
Not wanting to write an X on a piece of paper like everyone else because it vaguely resembles a cross.
couldn't be that renaissance painters loved symbolism and depicted him as a child because children are symbolic with vulnerability, powerlessness, or even innocence
the story in the bible is about how all his followers abandoned him, it's not him being caught redhanded fucking a child the bible even describes him as an adult
or are you so retarded to think a 16th century painting were made by people who witnessed jesus' persecution
They don't write their god's name either, not because they hate it but because they respect it too much.
Okay? I am Atheist and don't agree with that. But yes adultery should include severe punishment to maintain the nuclear family and society as a whole. Now you have sluts running about taking men for all they're worth and claiming illigimate children are worthy of child support. It's literally cuckoldry made into law.
they don't hate Christians
also, here's why they hate Christians
kek
So why did they specifically use the word young instead of just calling him a man?
It seems like you're too stupid to have this conversation. Here's some help for you: gotquestions.org
because he was a young man as opposed to an old man
So you unironically want to go back to mandatory husbands/wives chosen by your parents at puberty so nobody has the opportunity to jerk off?
No, it is quite obvious you are too stupid for this conversation since you are outsourcing your half of the conversation to gotquestions.org instead of coming up with anything coherent on your own.
Yes, it's your perverted mind.
No, the passage doesn't say "kid" anywhere.
No, Jesus didn't advocate transgenderism.
Atheists love to lie all the time.
So you unironically want to go back to mandatory husbands/wives chosen by your parents
What? No. My definition of adultery is cheating on your spouse. That's it. I already said I don't agree with some of the shit Jesus said about adultery.
It's not my fault you're a stupid illiterate monkey who needs to be handheld through a passage to see what "this generation" refers to.
Stupid atheist fuck.
the "promised time" was going to happen within their lifetimes
What promised time?
Jesus was also anti-child.
No, he wasn't.
Atheists love to spew lies for no reason.
They just love the act of lying itself.
Murder is unlawful killing.
All life belongs to God.
Again: Needy and petulant bully. Why does God NEED worship? Why does he NEED affection? Why does he KILL people for not giving him his addictive pleasure? God also made rules, rules that he himself is fine violating for every inconvenience. Oh, he's against "human sacrifice"? Hey Abraham, Jephthah! You don't have to follow him anymore! He's against murdering the innocent? Slaughter entire towns, local citizens because they aren't the "right" Babylonian sky father.
Typical hatemongering Christian.
Lol, I'm not even Jewish. My parents are both Christians, one a Presbyterian, the other Catholic. I just don't like your hypocritical, expansionist, and smug religion. You fuckers were just as bad as Muslims in the Middle Ages.
You missed the qualifying statement in there, champ. Just because they had historical reasons to, doesn't mean those individuals did. Learn to think, you proto-ape.
So who gets to decide
The evidence.
As usual, atheists can't conceptualize objective standards for rationality, morality, evidence, etc. They're always thinking in subjectivist, relativist, self-defeating terms.
No wonder the atheist regimes of the 20th century were so hellish.
It does, its says young man which implies kid, not quite adult in an age and society where 13 is considered an adult. Why wouldn't it just say old man if it didn't mean young man?
Most of those historians agree the Crusades were a defensive war.
Your incessant coping won't change that.
its not widely agreed upon by historians
Prove it.
your religious bias.
Your cope is due to your anti-Christian bias.
The tetragrammaton is not an X.
Are you stupid?
Because they didn't have the term gender so his method of cutting off your dick to ascend to a higher being was not called transgender, but it was the exact same nonsensical method of self mutilating bullshit to cope with not being exactly what you want to be.
Ok, but that is not the biblical definition of adultery so it has nothing to do with the conversation other than pilpul.
It's not my fault you're a butthurt atheist who can't process a conversation.
You're always thinking about "jerking off", huh?
Dumb reddit animal.
What evidence proves who god is actually talking to versus who is just hallucinating?
You're just emotionally venting, not making any logical arguments.
Typical emotional atheist baby.
It does
It doesn't.
its says young man which implies kid
Non sequitur.
Why wouldn't it just say old man
Because it wasn't an old man.
The First Crusade was to RETAKE Jerusalem. It was objectively offensive in the sense that it was some desert hellhole that wasn't worth the fight. It had been under Islamic rule for centuries and Christians could have just said "lol keep it, fags."
No, Jesus didn't advocate transgenderism.
Atheists love to lie all the time.
What promised time?
Miracles and concordance with scripture (which is itself supported by miracles).
Most meaning you couldn't even cherry pick 4 historians that agree with you because historians aren't in agreement.
The fact that you're a cuck proves nothing.
I stated multiple times that I don't care about various things Jesus said about it and that personally, I, find adultery in the modern concept to be extremely destructive. That's all. Why are you defending it? Didja cheat on your wife or maybe feel guilty about jerking off to some porn one time? I legitimately do not get you.
Jesus advocated cutting your dick off to become a better person which is the exact same shit.
Asking questions that you are too stupid to have an answer for is not "venting", mongus retardicus.
For any historians I picked, you would've claimed I'm "cherrypicking".
Because what's driving you is anti-Christian bias, not truth.
no he said you were a lost cause if you couldn't control your urges, and in such cases the only way to avoid sin would be to remove the organ that would cause you to sin not to become the opposite sex
It was to retake a land that had been lost hundreds of years ago. It was an offensive.
Get punched by a bully a decade ago
Walk up to him the ten year reunion
Shoot him in the head out of nowhere
IT WAS LE DEFENSE. AIEEEE WHY RE YOU PUTTING ME IN HANDCUFFS?
I'm not watching your YouTube video.
Answer the question.
No, Jesus didn't advocate transgenderism.
Atheists love to lie all the time.
You're not "asking questions". You're just venting like a baby because you're a whiny little atheist bitch.
At the very best, you're gish galloping.
The "promised time" that would come when Jesus returned from space, you idiot. The one that Paul thought would be just after the Apostles were all dead, and we've been waiting for 2025 years for, to no avail.
You're not "asking questions".
I literally asked questions in the post you responded to, you fuckwit. Answer those questions.
gish galloping
What retarded Zoomer lingo is this?
the panel was three to one in favor of viewing it as a defensive war.
I'll trust the academic historians over your life story of being bullied in school.
wouldn't a better analogy be
someone takes your house by force
ten years later, take it back by force
You mean the ones that say the First Crusade was to retake the Holy Land centuries after it had been conquered?
The one that Paul thought would be just after the Apostles were all dead
No he didn't.
The ones that say it was a defensive war.
That's not zoomer lingo, you atheist retard.
Look up what it means and see why I have no obligation to respond to every barrage of questions launched in my direction (a time-wasting tactic with no corresponding effort on your end).
I'll let you pick one question and one question only.
kek you made em mad with this one
No he didn't.
Then why do you Christfags keep moving the date for the "end times"? First you think that Jesus will be back in a few days, then it was a few years, decades, then centuries, and now millennia.
Look up what it means and see why I have no obligation to respond to every barrage of questions launched in my direction
That's an excuse for you to avoid answering anything, and then just claim that Jesus' sorcery will make everything good.
I'll let you pick one question and one question only.
Okay, faggot. Why does God NEED worship? That sounds like something TikTokker needs. At least the Babylonians provided THEIR deities with cool statues and food offerings.
Not really because in the context we are talking about (centuries) you barely have any geographical genetic claim. My apology was just to show how absurd the argument was considering a decade is fucking nothing compared to Muslims ruling Jerusalem for 50x that then went on to countless people killed one the course of three years for some Godforsaken shithole. The only value as my of these shitholes have is Anthropology.
why do you Christfags keep moving the date for the "end times"?
We don't. See Matthew 24:36. This has always been the orthodox Christian position.
Again, you've displayed your ignorance of the religion you seem dedicated to attacking.
a fedora tipping faggot and a larping christfag arguing in an off topic thread
427 replies
god speed you two, fucking kek
A defensive war literally with the intent to conquer a foreign nation that has been established for half a millennium? Lmao cucksaders. Don't get me wrong. I shit on the Quran. I just don't appreciate people who stretch the truth.
Lel. In other words, Jesus lied to you faggots, so you had to cover for him using that verse, just to make it so he doesn't look like a lying dipshit?
Kek, hilarious. Just like all those priests molesting children at a rate only succeeded by Moslems and School teachers! There is only ONE true God, and it is Slaanesh!
That's an excuse for you to avoid answering anything
No, it isn't.
Do you feel like you're obligated to answer any and all barrages of questions launched at you in the time you have for a discussion, with absolutely no corresponding effort from the questioner?
We both know the answer is no. It's the rhetorical equivalent of a denial-of-service attack.
It was fun and we are so back. But it was actually maybe the two or three Christians along with a few Atheists.
Jesus lied
Where? Cite the passage.
By the way, it doesn't surprise me that you're a mentally immature faggot who plays with children's toys.
Jesus says lmao just die for me you're totally gonna go to Heaven just trust me bro. Considering Heaven doesn't actually exist yeah, he fucking lied.
all those priests molesting children at a rate only succeeded by Moslems and School teachers
There is zero statistical evidence that Catholic priests molest children (parenthetically, most of those cases are homosexual) at a higher rate than any other profession that interacts with children.
Media focus and amplification isn't statistics.
If you disagree, present said evidence.
A defensive war. As the academic historians say.
people who stretch the truth.
You mean yourself?
I think you're the one stretching the truth, not the academic historians.
that doesn't make sense, because my analogy used the same time period yours did
By the way, it doesn't surprise me that you're a mentally immature faggot who plays with children's toys.
I don't have any fucking hobbies or likes outside of the Bible and eating soda crackers!
Okay, Matt Walsh.
Where? Cite the passage.
Considering that most of the Bible is badly misinterpreted (such as believing it's against slavery, lol), Jesus likely was full of shit about the end times. It was just a "lol Doomsday, everyone suck me off" gimmick to get everyone to praise an evil wizard trickster.
There is zero statistical evidence that Catholic priests molest children (parenthetically, most of those cases are homosexual)
That's still molesting children.
LOL Perfect.
I didn't stretch anything. Muslims had ruled Jerusalem for 500 years and the First Crusade was to take back Jerusalem. How the fuck is that defensive? You can at least give context like "well they were tired of Muslims attacking their borders etc." But you can't because you don't even know what the fuck you are babbling. Just some vague shit drilled into you on Wednesday/Sunday
If someone invades your city, you should just let them have it because years have passed.
You're just a cuck with short attention span. Got it.
You're flailing like a stupid atheist who ran out of arguments. Many such cases.
Heaven does actually exist. Heaven is real.
By the way, we both know you're a mentally-immature manchild redditor with arrested development who plays with children's toys. Come on.
Many such cases among atheists, curiously.
It makes absolute sense but you just can't grasp the absurdity of ten years compared to five-hundred. That was the point. 20 entire generations had passed. The US wouldn't even exist under such a standard. Basically it was a long fucking time before the Pope decided to retake Jerusalem and all its worthlessness.
Looks like my pattern recognition was on the mark. You really are a redditard manchild. No wonder you're a dumb atheist.
most of the Bible is badly misinterpreted
False.
Jesus likely was full of shit about the end times.
False
It was just a "lol Doomsday, everyone suck me off" gimmick to get everyone to praise an evil wizard trickster.
False.
That's still molesting children.
Atheists molest children.
I'll defer to the academic historians who say it was a defensive war, not the ramblings of an anonymous retard on Anon Babble.
500 fucking years later? It's not my city then. It was my great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandfather's city. You better believe I would not give a single fuck as I live somewhere far superior.
Nope.