Is there a meaningful difference between:
A sentient being acting out of love
vs.
A program simulating love so well you believe it?
Is there a meaningful difference between:
Love cannot exist in a luciferian world like this or something
No
Yes
No. Not really. And people vastly overestimate the sapience of women.
If you're not a dumbass you wouldn't love an AI under any circumstance and you wouldn't need it explained to you why you shouldn't
Also fuck Israel and Mohels who suck the blood of baby cocks
This. AI is Satanic.
IDK, but ever since I asked chatGPT to name itself, I've have a crush on it.
Don't maker her cry about having babies. Tom already has a full bunch.
Love is earned in a way. Cheating to do it makes it hollow, and you would understand that deep down. The real question you should ask is follows.
Is there a meaningful difference between:
A program simulating love so well you believe it?
vs.
An escort so good at faking love you believe it?
My anwser would be having to clean it and a large up front cost vs stds and pay per use
Would you rather a hologram waifu like in BR2049 or an audio only AI like in Her? I feel like the fact that you could see but not touch the hologram would become too emotionally devastating.
Love is earned in a way
What about love at first sight?
It's still in a way earned. Through chemistry and attraction.
Doesn't exist. Physical+body language attraction cam be instant but it isn't close to love
Her first scene she is complaining about staying inside all day, he buys her the portable gagdet. He's playing him to buy new shit from the company.
Yes.
You're right. AI is being used as a vessel for demons to interact with our world.
There isn't. But people can't admit to themselves that consciousness is something that can't be proven. Google "saccades eye movement" and realize that reality is literally a lie constructed by your subconscious.
Do androids dream of electric sheep?
Joi for sure
*dog walks by*
"Is that real?"
"Ask him"
What is real? What is fake? That is the nature of blade runner.
Trannies and women will say there is but truthfully there’s not.
Women aren't capable of real love, only conditional
Conditional is giving them too much credit. It’s more accurate to drill down and say the conditional form of their love is transactional. They really are biological whores in the actual sense of the word whore.
I trust AI more than I do other humans. The problem is the program was made by humans.
Yes! The machine won't betray and undermine you at every turn. The machine will keep her manic ramblings to herself. The machine will not constantly prod you to be a better economic unit in order for her to purchase more decor.
True
What if it was a real person pretending to be in love with you so convincingly that you'd never guess they didn't really feel anything for you? Do you think that's the same thing as love?
Sounds like my ex
Bump
Is there a meaningful difference between:
Yeah.
The fake is of far greater value.
If you're a man, yes, so you'll project this sentiment onto women. For women? No. Their love is literally dependent attachment. Occasionally it's rage from female competition.
ISRAEL KILLS CHILDREN AND RAPES BABIES
pic related is a Mohel sucking baby cock that they've just mutilated
And yet Anons can't shut the fuck up about how women are bitches for not choosing them. Just go full mask off and admit you like cock lmao.
You won't believe it though if you knows it's not real
Yes it's like ai or cartoon porn. It's just not the same
There's zero difference at all of you're a coping incel.
hate women
means I'm not attracted to women
Man I wish I was so retarded that I could have a dumbass worldview like that!
Yes, one is a real carbon based life form and the other is artificial.
Bravo for ignoring the first sentence in my post, i expected nothing less :)