Um well you see Gobleki Tepe
Therefore all science and history is false
Um well you see Gobleki Tepe
I hate this retarded faggot grifter so much it's unreal. Between him and shit like Ancient Aliens, every smoothbrain and boomer in the world thinks history is fake and aliens built everything.
asks questions
gets labeled as a Nazi white supremacist for it
all history is false
yeah probably
he makes nepotistic oversocialized cucks like dibble ideologically self-implode so hes based, sensationalist stuff like his and ancient aliens keep people interested in these topics and asking questions and i don't care that they make money off it.
Yes
younger dry ass period
Based
/Thread
This guy is stupid but smart and evasive about it. His fans are just retarded.
ideologically self-implode
What does tgis even mean? There's no ideology relevant here. Dibble has archeological evidence for his claims and Graham doesn't. That's all there is to it.
dibble lives in a bubble of progressive liberal academics who think of themselves as taking on this task of leading the dumb masses with their "science" they see synonymous with their political ideology, thats why he strawmans graham's sensationalist grift as a right-wing chud white supremacy, they have no empathy and are incapable of understanding the world outside of their liberal scope, dibble has no empathy and has no teeth as a normal man, hes an oversocialzied liberal who can only express himself by scoffing at the thought of someone who doesn't agree with him and instantly dismissing them as various wrongthink "isms" as a way of wielding power. normal people think this is ridiculous and will instantly think graham is right when he says something funny like "big archeology" when they see that, guys like dibble lack the self-awareness to see that.
thats also why dibble doesn't realize why joe rogan is both rational and doesn't agree with dibble, not just because hes a rightwing strawman, but hes also not there to be convinced, he's simply running a program with a target audience, not there to be convinced or turned towards dibble's perspective, they aren't just dumb massses.
Last time we had this thread we had two shovelbums chime in and the ballwashers jumped to paradoxically called them both in the pocket of big science wasting mountains of taxpayer money and also pathetic poor fags at the same time.
Therefore all science and history is false
Where's the lie tho?
some things you can look for is in the JRE episode, dibble talks to rogan about archeology for a while, and rogan is genuinely interested, but dibble doesn't really elaborate on how things are interested and leads the conversation on that road to make it fun, he just controls it towards "and THATS why i'm right and THATS why graham is such a devil and THATS why you should look up my academic friend whos a expert in transqueer history" and kills the vibe, hes only there for one task and he doesn't understand the JRE podcast whatsoever, he's out of touch and thinks the average person is like the people who glaze his nuts on reddit, perhaps its aspergers but this is extremely typical of progressive liberals of his kind they don't understand other perspectives and think their own extremist view is actually average/default. i believe he also made several videos basically arguing against rogan, which again is extremely stupid even in itself. most of what he does is promote his own little weird circlejerk of tranny commie professors acting like they are some neutral true scientific scholars.
There was some tard who got pleb filtered by “preform” and thought it was “gatekeeping academic terminology.” The playbook hasn’t changed since the Bigfoot believers rhetoric was honed in the 80s and 90s. At least the Bigfoot guys were mostly harmless. I’d be happy if they found the guy.
It’s kind of astounding how much sway ancient aliens style programming has with the normie crowd. I had a guy I was working with talk about them using alien mana to put up the Moai heads at Rapa Nui because “the island has no trees to roll them on.” Then I told him the island did have trees back when they were built and he looked a little bummed out.
Destroys Ancient Aliens simpers
Kinda hard not to be when you're using racially tinged Great White God shit straight out of the pulps to back up your "questions". (which are semi-loaded at that)
who gives a shit faggot humans spent most of history believing in absolute bullshit. it's only a modern thing that we expect every single retard to dogmatically believe in objective truth that they have no ability to verify.
these beliefs are stupid but ultimately harmless, find something better to care about.
people believe this or at least entertain the idea
urinate and defecate themselves when the Holocaust is questioned
Aliens might be real but humans are too perfect to lie about politics...?
muh race
You don't need a white "god"--regular people created civilization and gave it to everyone else, who resisted every step of the way. Asians are a close second. Everyone else practically lives in caves, even today
You don't want to spend a fortune excavating and ruining the landscape where I arbitrarily think there's a lost civilization?
That means I'm correct and you're censoring me
Graham, your hypothesis of a lost civilization using magic to levitate boulders is ridiculous, I'm sorry
yes yes, but, have you excavated every last square inch of desert to prove that they didn't exist?
that's not how it works Graham
reeeeee the establishment
His theory makes no sense.
So, before Sumer (earliest known civilization we have record of) there existed greater more advanced ones, where the technology was given to mankind by an extraterrestrial race, who are also humans but aliens somehow. After the great flood (which most people's claim happened), we lost all the tech and the aliens never came back.
No, there is no proof of any of this. Yet, he is right and the rest of the scientists/archeologists are wrong. This is a grifter.
what happened to the pillars under the pyramids story from a month ago? already forgotten?
people's
This is plural possessive, which is incorrect. Learn English.
dude wouldn't it be crazy if the gods in ancient mythology were aliens?
yeah that would be cool as fuck, like stargate or some shit lol
wahhhhh you're literally doing a racism and a transphobia by having fun with history!
No, it's not, because I was referencing humanity in general and the difference societies. You wouldn't say "peoples'" because there's no reason to lump them together as a singular group as their takeaways are all different.
You're like Graham in that you have no idea what you're talking about and make shit up.
i dread this lad making a visit to ireland
did you know theres a place just up the road that predates newgrange?
yeah lad
he makes some fair points, but ill never be convinced most rock movings were pisshead competitions
Why is this so impressive anyway? Looks like a pile of rocks me and my friends could put together
...
I don’t think gobekli tepe is some lost ancient alien colony or any of that nonsense but to his credit, it was a patch of desert wasteland the Turkish government ignored until it was discovered, and they all of a sudden decided to give a fuck and declare it a national park so they could cordon it off and charge admission fees. There are more ruins there and it would be retarded to ignore them.
Why not just get a coat that fits?
F-FUCK YOU DIBBLE!! I'LL TEACH YOU TO MAKE A FOOL OF ME ON JOE ROGANS PODCAST YOU TWERP!!!!
most people's claim
Learn English, retard
The correct form is people's when referring to the possessive of a single group of people (e.g., "the people's choice"). Peoples' is used when referring to multiple, distinct groups of people (e.g., "the peoples of the world").
Can you stop talking about things you don't understand, Graham? It's embarrassing. kek
doesn't know English
has to resort to asking AI to lie to him to confirm his obviously wrong bias
Lmao, this is the hallmark of truly low IQ in 2025
Hey, Graham, why not try showing some proof for anything you say? Then the big bad establishment might not try to shut you down for being a dumb retard.
most people claim
Fixed it for you, so now you can stop replying. QED, noob. Enjoy your low IQ.
inb4 salty/passive aggressive response
:^)
I went to Gobekli Tepe wasn't even that impressed boring innit
inb4 to save my heckin' ego
Yeah, you're that insecure and wrong, just like Graham.
Wow anyway.... Dibble had evidence for his claims and Graham does not. GG
Yes
I love how butthurt everyone is over Billy Carson theories
it's sci fi fantasy bullshit which is on the level as dark matter drivel on natgeo. there are better examples of prehistoric megalithic structures like pic related
the person conducting the investigation turned out to be an ancient alyium nutjob himself, so everything stated has to be taken with a grain of salt.
libtards believe we were riding dinosaurs by this point in time, having a major settlement fucks their timeline of Progress™
Nothing Carson or Graham says are even interesting. You've been doing this shit since fucking Crowley. I'm sick to death of every normalfag thinking they're based schizo because they watched a documentary on tubi about nephilim.
Were you there, m8?
This isn't Reddit Flint you're not welcome here
But thanks for stopping by
göbekli tepe is 12000 years old! the mainstream scientists wont tell you that?
who told you that
mainstream scientist
uses misdated archeological site to prove a (false) point
implies their shutting it down to stop the truth from coming out (when they're only doing it because of insufficient structural safety)
claims the amazon is manmade and it used to have megacities in it with millions of citizens (even though most south american experts have debunked this countless times)
Name a bigger con artist.
Nothing particularly remarkable happened until the 20th century.
Everyone starts somewhere , you were also an annoying retard at first (you still are, but in a different, more deluded way)
That aircraft is just a basic ass plane with le funny shape and a black paintjob, it's not rocket science.
The only questions that need to be asked here is: what counts as scientific evidence? Who determines what is and isn't credible? Why should we "trust the science" if there is a replication crisis?
How do we know that we have any archeological evidence for anything when people have fooled members of the scientistic community with pig teeth and fresh volcanic rock samples?
So far, nobody's even been able to verify the tech does what they say it does yet, much less that it shows what it supposedly shows.
turned out to be
The intro to the actual paper goes heavy on the fringe. IIRC the previous paper was even worse.
I think there's a correlation with Ancient Aliens and RFKjr being our Secretary of Health. I don't think it's harmless. Not saying these people should be muzzled though
There's this thing called 'trust', and another called 'experts'. I'll let you fill in the gap.
That plane is LITERALLY filled with rocket science, ackchually.
hes literally designed for archaeology, look at those tiny hands
Makes bold idiotic claims
Gets called a retard for it
there's something especially pathetic about a midwit with a posh british accent
You don't have to trust the science. You're not a scientist, what does it matter? It doesn't change your life in any way but there's a difference between not trusting science and having schizo delusions about what the truth really is
The fact remains that no excavation has ever uncovered anything more than stone age technology.
BASED
Why do people pretend trains didn't exist until the 1930's or something? By the time that buggy pic was taken there were early automobiles on the road.
Also way to ignore multiple collapses.
"Trust the experts"
So trust the people who are paid to hold down the current narrative until that narrative slowly erodes (aka. "gets updated")? Nothing seems to last as far as scientific understanding is concerned, every theory that is supposed to be concrete gets updated to the point that what it originally said is so far from the current understanding that it is obvious that there was barely any understanding at all to begin with.
The first combustion vehicles weren't hitting the road till the last decade of the 1800's.
There is a huge overlap between ancient alien fags, and holocaust deniers. Most of the early ancient alien shit was made up by a white supremacist.
So trust the people who are paid to hold down the current narrative
Don't be a conspiratard. The huge fame and money is in revising the narrative and introducing revolutionary ideas. Smart people are not incentivized to keep with the same old same old.
And yet you drive a car, travel by plane and vaccinate your kids. Hey but the science could change at any moment so better not risk it!
sensationalist stuff like his and ancient aliens keep people interested in these topics and asking questions and i don't care that they make money off it.
You probably should. "Just asking questions" is a perfectly acceptable approach if it's being done in good faith and actually progressing the conversations. This is the basis of reviewing known theories to test our knowledge.
However when it is done simply to make money there is no real conversation to be had because Graham is just selling skepticism and is approaching the conversation from a side that just wants to keep repeating the same scenario and selling said scenario over and over again.
As long as people are paying attention to him he is winning and he'll keep the conversation stagnate to keep the attention.
current narrative
What we know right know
gets updated
What we learned recently
This is how research and science works retard
Are we going to pretend he's successfully reproduced now?
what does it matter?
Because you faggots keep telling people that they are retards and schizos if they continue to hold on to faith in God instead of throwing it away for the ever changing, increasingly progressive field of scientific understanding and knowledge which provides no moral or ethical stability for the lives of people.
which provides no moral or ethical stability
Man, I don't know if you've really looked into religion in the last few years (or centuries, or millennia), but moral and ethical stability aren't exactly hallmarks of it.
scientists revise their model of the world as new knowledge is gained
this is a conspiracy
What do you propose a better system be, anything anyone ever says is now fact until proven otherwise?
BS, scientists make leaps in logic, irreparably damage people by telling them what they must do in order to combat some up coming catastrophe or disease and then their "knowledge gets updated" and they are magically absolved from all harm because they have a convenient excuse to fall back on, it all seems very, vey jewish.
We are all gonna be dead in 5 years if we don't destroy our economy!
We are all gonna be dead if you don't take this experimental drug!
You can't hold me accountable! I didn't know! Oy vey
Every important fact about the Universe was recorded by professional clerics based on the accounts of sun-delirious child and camel fucking nomads. That this record has been edited and revised just like scientific journals is something you shouldn't consider questioning.
jewish
Stop being a retard and go back to Anon Babble
provides no moral or ethical stability for the lives of people
Nigger, once you start arguing for the utilitarian psychological need for religion instead of it literally being true, you're larping. Nietzsche spinning in his grave.
Then why are you on Anon Babble and the internet if you can't handle some discussion and debate?
When would you say that picture was taken approximately?
And you're off by about half a decade, about a decade for electric cars and several decades for steam.
This. Notice it's ok to ask questions until you question the questioner, and then the reeing starts. The Socratic method doesn't play favorites.