It was a good movie
Civil War (2024)
nah it sucked
boy i doubt a russian agitation shill will pop in crying about journalists or seeing a black female soldier
it was honestly mid
culo
my favorite part of this was the journalists reporting and utilizing strategy of truth you leave out any information that emotionally conflicts with your narrative other than that it is genuinely shit in all fields/
i watch for she
The worst part was the Battle of DC / Whitehouse.
Where the bunch of preening nepo babies making the film think war is when two opposing sides fight 20 feet away from each other while mag dumping.
The Apache being called in to destroy a building, so it hovered approximately 15 feet away from the building before destroying it.
Or using a Tank to destroy a security hut outside the whitehouse made of plywood.
very silly.
It got the journalism in a dangerous environment right and the war part wrong. Best part was the right wing death squad
It was
Fuck off, Anon Babble. No one thinks you're cool.
NTA but the movie was shit. Cope.
Ukrainians predicted a civil war in Russia amid the continuous war
US is actually more likely to have civil war than Russia ever did
Liberals just keep losing
I was caught off guard when the Japanese robot from ex machina started speaking English in this movie. Thought she was mute kek
so what the FUCK happened to cause Texas and California to be on the same side?
That was the director trying to make it clear he’s a fence sitter by taking the most blue and red state and putting them on the same team
But what kind of American are you?
They are the states with the largest military installations and the largest state economies and populations outside of New York.
the most blue and red state
In no universe are either of those "the most blue" or "the most red" state.
Trump. Nobody wants to die for Israel and ZionDon wants to march all goyim so he can replace us with indians
One of the fat stupid ones?
Is this a trick question?
The movie makes it pretty clear it's the military in those two states that seceded and allied, not the state governments. Together they would stand the most chance against DC, especially with large portions of the rest of the country also splintering.
Stereotypically they are. I say that as someone who isn’t American, so I don’t know the complexities of your politics. But if you asked any person here for the most left wing and right wing states, they would absolutely all say California and Texas
California yes, Texas not anymore (30-40 years ago maybe, nowadays too many Hispanics and the cities are now very blue). Stereotypically reddest state would be either Alabama or Mississippi
The most red state would be somewhere like Wyoming, and the most blue state would be somewhere like Hawaii. Small populations that are very homogenous. Texas and California have massive populations, even if they're more Republican and Democratic they each have millions of left and right leaning people respectively.
What they actually both have in common besides population is huge military forces and economies, enough that both together would be more than most countries.
op slurps gallons of cum AGAIN
0 redeeming qualities of this shit film
They would be wrong, that's a traditional view that doesn't hold up anymore because of immigration and coastal flight
"This was the most important movie I've ever been a part of", Spaeny explains, "because it shows how ordinary citizens can topple the white power structure. The work of journalists and photographers has been key to exposing the racism of American society. Without journalists, George Floyd's murderers would have never faced justice."
scene where some Boogaloo Boy faggots are committing a war crime by executing US Army regulars fulfilling their duty to protect the duly-elected President
they're playing happy rap
Did sucking dicks make you retarded, OP, or was it the other way 'round?
It was a good movie
No. It was as if a sleep-deprived Terrence Malick said, "What's the most implausible modern American Civil War scenario I can come up with?"
she didn't say that
Civil war looks shit in my opinion, but his next movie looks interesting.
It's probably Missouri now, Florida just has the temporary fever of Donaldmania.
But Missouri is the most try-hard "Southern" State in the Union.
There is no way you regularly spend time in texas.
A movie about journalists traveling through a Myanmar-style US civil war could have been fucking amazing. Watching white-nationalists clashing with Klan over identity politics at a roundtable meeting in the St. Louis courthouse, with rogue Illinois national guard, a revolutionary socialist brigade, nuclear-armed Plains States military junta, tribal confederation self-defence forces and Ozarks backwood militia, all trying to reach a consensus on what's to be done about the breakaway Texan republic getting Buks from Russia, the secessionist south and Chinese PLAN ships sailing up the Mississippi, building permanent ports around "aid stations" with PLA detachments for "security". Meanwhile, French, British, Japanese and South Korean ships are running damage control, practically occupying lawless cities, trying to blockade US ports from receiving Russian and Chinese arms shipments. SAS and SASR being given permission to run snatch missions on Atomwaffen safehouses to find the group making dirty bombs. Black nationalists bursting levees in the south and flooding New Orleans. Seal teams having their own internal coup and Delta turned loose on traitor/loyalist SOF.
celebrates journos
Pure shit.
this. it could have been very good. it didn’t go hard enough. at the end it did better. it just held itself back for too long. it should have been closer to a complete dystopian nightmare
I used to be a driver, I've been nearly everywhere. It would be more accurate to say that Texans don't go anywhere else and can't compare. is way more accurate.
This. It was spectacularly bad.
Why do you obsessively make up unconvincing fake quotes for Cailee Spaeny and no one else?
Anon Babble is Anon Babble's greatest board you scum sucking faggot.
It was good, but I think it would be mid/bad if you were going in expecting more about the civil war or the world building. Which is kinda fair imo.
but wot bout....muh politics!? where's the big cavalry charge battle?
The film is about how an actual modern civil war occurs, just in a familiar setting instead of some abstract far off place
/slavwarchicom/ is a garbage board and you know it
Glad this lil bitch didn't get to play Ellie now.
I love all of Alex Garland's other works, both as a writer and director, but this movie was nothing more than 6/10 at best.
Incredibly disappointing movie.
samefag
I feel it captured the vibe of one and avoided getting bogged down in expository details that ultimately don't actually matter as far as the experience goes.
Yup, pretty much. Had someone who couldn't enjoy it because 'TX and CA working together so I couldn't suspend my disbelief'. Which is ridiculous, some of these people watch capeshit.
A calefornia secessian war would of been awesome.
Ghiblify this
One of those cases of people just bitching they didn't get a film they invented in their head and not evaluating the film they actually got for what it is.
Great looking film, but astoundingly good SOUNDING film. Should have had an Oscar nom for Best Sound.
What we "got" was a faggot power fantasy about overthrowing LE ORANGE HITLER and if fucking sucked. It doesn't even work if you agree with the politics, because the dumb bitch zoomer girl got the protagonist killed by being a moron.
Here's an example now.
immediately responds by spazzing out about an imaginary film
Proving me correct in rapid fashion
That's an evaluation of the film that actually existed. Don't try to defend this hack shit by saying "I wanted a different movie"...when a movie sucks, of fucking course you want a different movie.
you saw whatever you wanted to see
That part wasn't even that strange to me. The premise was 'some kind of regime in DC that is so strange that both CA and TX secede together', no need to get into too deep for the film but I could assume it would be the worst parts of Reps and Dems and Inds all together and they won or stole an election.
The thing that let it down for me was more that they were really pulling the punches on the excesses of a civil war. The 'what kind of American' scene got it, but it wasn't the throughline it was the crescendo. And because it was an outlier, it made the whole thing seem like a carefully managed press report on a civil war, just one that was trying to make the point about red glasses faction being the worst. It's completely fine for the story for this guy to be a Presidentista who took the shot to get rid of some non-Americans, they just wussed out on how extreme everything else around him would have been.
Still a pretty good film though. I would have preferred to see a few larger scale set piece battles with more collateral damage than more of the red glasses guys, but it was missing in both counts.
It exposed the lugenpresse pretty hard but that's going to completely go over the heads of the people that listen to the lugenpresse; so ultimately the entire thing is pointless.
and not evaluating the film they actually got for what it is.
Can you explain to me what the purpose of Civil War was, and what you personally got out of it?
it sucked ASS anon, kys
Correct
You wouldn't know good content if you sucked it out of an asshole.
Anti-war movie
The best scenes are the combat
Every time
just watch the battle of algiers