Was Ted right?

progress is progress

dude, just accept the death of art lol

Youre not an artist bro. You cant even make a funny mspaint image so what do you care about art and machine learning models.

why do you care about good food, you're not a chef

i know being a contrarian is fun, but you at least have to have some logic in your arguments

why is she wet

bc sweat is a natural part of human existence and a mostly unspoken component of sexual attraction. google pheromones

i see. thats cool

How is artists having more tools at their disposal supposed to herald the death of art? Shouldn't it facilitate greater expressions of it? Again, it's like whining about the movie camera being the death of art because it circumvents the theater

I hope someone sets Angry Tom on fire

because the ai model is shit

incorrect, it was included in the prompt. the model is fantastic, tf u talking about. do u remember AI a year ago? people have gotten insanely greedy and gluttonous if they cant appreciate where we're at. this already looks better than her in death stranding. post your higher quality elles

Fucking retard

UAE shouldn't be #3, the usage stats should just be lumped in with India. There are more jeets in the UAE than actual Emirates. 27% of the pop is jeet, 11.5% is Emirate. Its insane how many fucking jeets are there.

I'm not a luditte because I think all of this is gay retarded looking tasteless slop with zero value. I can enjoy and accept some tech and reject other tech if I think it's shitty and harmful for humanity. Sick of this weird shilling for AI that you simply must accept everything coming or you must reject it all and live in the woods. Fuck you

because I think

you don't think that. you have been handed that opinion by the hivemind and now you are parroting it. if you were honest with yourself you would look at some of this shit with fresh eyes and admit damn (some of) this stuff looks great wether I knew how it was created or no. only way you havent seen anything good yet is if youre intentionally blind to it

ted kaczynski was right

I can think for myself and it doesn't impress me much honestly

Uncle Ted, a man considerably more intelligent than you, wrote an entire book on why you're wrong. You should read it.

seeing a meme here or there is not gonna be the optimal tech demo. you need to play with it yourself. use sora for 20 minutes. remix pre existing images, and create entirely new ones out of thin air. once u get your hands dirty it IS that impressive

Seems it's you who's stuck in the past if you assume that things will just get better and better because of technology and "progress".

nta but I don't believe you and agree with him. If you were just "not impressed" you wouldn't care and you wouldn't be itt. you were told to be angry and needed to tell us how angry you are. If you were just bored by it, you wouldn't even be here.

Context matters in art it's not a race to see who digitally paint something the fastest and most efficient. I'm a human being not a fucking advertisement company. It's all shit for idiots. Why don't you fill your house with huge prints of ai art you big fag and you can see how fucking lame that actually is. It has no meaning, no value and no soul because it cost next to nothing to create.

The Art of filmography already died once CGI became a thing

dude we just need a revolution happening in the entire world at the same time and win everywhere

literal spiteful self-hating tranny that accomplished nothing of value and died

Yeah I'm not gonna bet on them

Why don't you say that in a mirror? You're shilling for technocrats for free?

imagine how hard Industrial Society and it's Future hits when you're working in a Chinese sweatshop factory

lmao, yep, you're exactly what I thought you were

art only has value if it costs money to make.

Lol
Lmao

It has no meaning, no value and no soul because it cost next to nothing to create.

hey chief, cave drawings cost next to nothing to create. do they have no meaning?

they are visual representations of meaning. to call them empty based on their method of creation is totally braindead. if a ai image expresses a concept well, then it has value. if it looks aesthetically pleasing as they increasingly do, all the more so

you can't dropkick every techbro into an active volcano

That's where you're wrong.

The autist to tranny pipeline has been going on longer than we thought. We can’t keep blaming anime for it.

And time and effort and material and air breathed and the person who made it and their entire life and everything they saw and experienced and everyone they ever met and every artist they saw and were inspired by and their physicality and their mental state and the culture that surrounded them no biggie just human being shit we can just dump that in the garbagio in order to more efficiently advertise to the muttpajeet hybrids that will inherent this world

Anime attracts autists, hence the connection.

i bet ppl said the same shit about the printing press when it was new. we're losing the humanity of the transcribers! flash forward, u dont think about them at all

How is transcribing even similar? Isn't that just the manual labor of copying the same thing over and over? Kys nigger

Isn't that just the manual labor

yup. youre getting warmer

Lmao are you implying that all of art is just manual labor? Leave art to the artists you obviously don't get it. Please fill your home with ai art prints and invite people over you deserve that kind of embarassing lifestyle seems a perfect fit

ah yes, the two types of AI grifters
the

Impressive. Amazing. Gorgeous. Art in the hands of the creative. Michelangelo himself would be proud. Subscribe to UnlimitedslopworksAI now for 15.99/week for a limited time offer.

and the

This shit is FUCKED. If you're not investing into AI you are FUCKED. Your days are fucking NUMBERED. Time to learn to flip motherfucking BURGERS you fucking ARTKEK.

are you implying that all of art is just manual labor

no but nice tard misreading of my argument
i'st not "JUST" manual labor. but the manual side is undeniably a component of it, which you effortfags love to fetishize. the other component is the concept, where it's no different than a painter. you have an idea and you realize it. only thing changing is the method

How is artists having more tools at their disposal supposed to herald the death of art

Its a shit tool and you are paid to shill it. Simple as.

or how about option 3

playing w this shit is fun and funny and has clear potential as a tool for creative work, shitposting, everyday text like resume editing/brainstorming, and the seething hate around it seems to be a psyop and has similar vibes as the ppl who rub their ass on a tesla

You are missing the forest for the trees anon you actually do not understand the purpose of art. It's not a race to make the most realistic picture as quickly as possible.

It's not progressing anything, its regressing. It makes extremely cheap, low quality shit and it doesn't revolutionize any sort of art style. At best it's a toy for children.

nta but it's a hugely powerful tool and we are shilling it for free because it unironically is the future. it will be absolutely everywhere within a few months and i'm not even mad about that. it is an evolution of the discourse, almost like when memes went big. u should try it before u speak

'the purpose of art' imagine saying this with a straight face and then claiming to be an artistic person. youre a zombie karen trying to clutch on to some outdated rulebook... for what is supposed to be FREE expression and creativity. you dont understand the purpose of art- there IS no "purpose". theyre images that make you feel things. ai can do that too

guy shows me this nft game he made with ai prompts

looks and plays like absolute dogshit

worse than a mobile game with even more ads

"this is awful"

"dude this is the future why don't you become a welder if you don't like this"

cool future bros

that is just the second but w/ c00l & aloof posting 2 appeal 2 fellow c00l & aloof ppl such as myself

an "nft game" was bad

wow this is truly a powerful AI critique that is widely applicable

I feel like taking a big dump when I see random endless permutation of stolen art #62638287738 created by raj poonani of mumbai weddy cool picture my friend am arist

almost like when memes went big

blud seriously using this as a positive

What the fuck is this image trying to say? AI is pig slop? That's correct, though.

nta but it's a hugely powerful tool and we are shilling it for free because it unironically is the future. it will be absolutely everywhere within a few months and i'm not even mad about that. it is an evolution of the discourse, almost like when memes went big. u should try it before u speak

The fear that AI could make movies "soulless" is valid, but here's the thing: AI isn't necessarily about replacing human creativity; it's more about enhancing and supporting it.

AI can be a tool that filmmakers use to express ideas in new and innovative ways. It can help with tedious tasks like editing, special effects, or even scriptwriting, but it still needs human vision and input to give it meaning. AI, in essence, amplifies human creativity rather than replaces it.

Imagine a director using AI to streamline certain technical aspects, but still keeping the heart of the story and characters very much human. Think of it like a paintbrush. The AI can be the tool, but the soul of the painting—the emotion, the message—comes from the artist holding it.

Some directors and creatives already use AI in ways that deepen storytelling. It can help create immersive worlds, assist in generating soundscapes, or even offer unique angles on characters, all while maintaining the core essence of what makes a film personal.

In short, AI doesn’t have to make films soulless—it's up to how it’s used. If creators remain at the heart of the process, it could become a new and exciting medium for storytelling rather than a threat to its soul.

draws mustaches on a newspaper print of Mona Lisa with a ballpoint pen

"It doesn't matter if you like it or not, progress is progress"

t. JeetGPT

its pretty simple. those who seethe against AI and claim they would never watch anything AI, already ARE consuming AI content unknowingly as its been widely adopted by studios. everyone who watched the brutalist watched AI assisted audio mixing. what that 'slop'?

Yeah that's nice but in reality it's actually going to be used to replace 99% of all the art we see in our daily lives because the world is run by greedy extremely cynical nonartists.

The fear that AI could make movies "soulless" is valid, but here's the thing: AI isn't necessarily about replacing human creativity; it's more about enhancing and supporting it.

AI can be a tool that filmmakers use to express ideas in new and innovative ways. It can help with tedious tasks like editing, special effects, or even scriptwriting, but it still needs human vision and input to give it meaning. AI, in essence, amplifies human creativity rather than replaces it.

Imagine a director using AI to streamline certain technical aspects, but still keeping the heart of the story and characters very much human. Think of it like a paintbrush. The AI can be the tool, but the soul of the painting—the emotion, the message—comes from the artist holding it.

Some directors and creatives already use AI in ways that deepen storytelling. It can help create immersive worlds, assist in generating soundscapes, or even offer unique angles on characters, all while maintaining the core essence of what makes a film personal.

In short, AI doesn’t have to make films soulless—it's up to how it’s used. If creators remain at the heart of the process, it could become a new and exciting medium for storytelling rather than a threat to its soul.

GOOD MORNING SAAR

Being pro-AI is about supporting technological progress and innovation, not about any particular nationality or background. AI can benefit people from all over the world, regardless of where they’re from.

t seems like there’s a misunderstanding here. AI is a global development that brings together people from all cultures and countries. Let’s talk about the technology and its potential, rather than making it about where someone is from.

I didn’t know being pro-AI came with a national label! I guess I’ll have to look into what country that’s from.

AI is a field that brings together minds from all corners of the globe. It’s not about any one nationality, but about progress for humanity.

My support for AI is based on my belief in its potential to help the world, not based on where I’m from or anyone else is from.

t. ai slop pig

the brutalist

Oh shit saars looks like we've been BTFO really hard. The best movie that all of us on Anon Babble really loved had AI assistance to turn out as good as it did? It's so thoroughly fucking over.

Congrats on parroting the groupthink buzzword of the week. You’ve memorized the script—“soulless,” “slop,” “derivative”—without stopping to ask yourself why you’re so eager to join the chorus. What you’re actually saying is: “This looks too polished, too good, too beyond what I'm capable of as a human—so my brain short-circuited and I took the easy way out. I called it slop, because I’m not yet in a place mentally where I can give AI a win.”

This isn’t critique. It’s emotional deflection dressed up as taste. Maybe what’s really eating at you isn’t the content itself, but the creeping realization that a machine spat out in 60 seconds something more imaginative, more technically competent, and more culturally attuned than anything you could produce sweating over a blank canvas for months. And that stings, doesn’t it?

So you lash out—not at the work, but at the idea of it. You join a swelling crowd of zombie cynics, broadcasting your own fear, insecurity, and lack of imagination like it's a virtue. You repeat the phrases you’ve been handed, thinking it makes you sound insightful, when really it just confirms your discomfort with a shifting creative landscape you no longer understand.

And all of this—over a silly little meme. A joke. A visual gag. Something that exists for five seconds before being scrolled past. And yet here you are, arms folded, scowling with performative moral superiority, like the internet’s last line of defense against Skynet. Spare me.

You’re not fighting for art. You’re fighting for your ego. And you're losing.

Be serious though how much could you possibly be getting paid for doing this?

love when anons sputter out their little snide ironic remarks and dodge answering any point. says more than a honest reply ever could

He gets paid in usage tokens.

Ohhh weddy cool booba I want to marry

Haha, fair question—but honestly, I’m not getting paid a cent for this. I’m just genuinely interested in where AI is taking us. It’s not just some tech trend—it’s reshaping everything from how we create art and music to how people learn, work, and even communicate. I think it’s important to have real conversations about it, beyond the hype or the fear-mongering.

I know it might seem odd to some people that someone would spend time thinking or writing about this stuff just for the sake of it, but not everything has to be about money. Sometimes it’s just about being curious, asking big questions, and trying to make sense of what’s coming. That’s what I’m doing here.

Lean how to shit in a toilet, poojeet.

Ah, there it is—the classic fallback when someone runs out of actual points: stereotypes and weak assumptions. Doesn’t really matter where I’m from (for the record, not India), and it definitely doesn’t change the logic or value of what I said. If the best counter you’ve got to a thoughtful conversation is throwing around tired generalizations, maybe you’re not ready for the conversation in the first place.

uses chatgpt because he doesnt know english

I'm dead

>uses a reaction meme because he doesnt know he's being trolled

sad! antis are just 2d thinkers

Remember when the camera came along and all realistic painting died and not a single picked up a paintbrush again? Good times those were.

What's that? Technological advancement doesn't prevent the artistic from expressing themselves? Meanwhile, the non-artistic seek blame for their lack of drive rather than making art.

Shut up.

I wanna see Goodfellas 2

AI generated visuals look weird.

This is the first moment I've been glad he was dead desu. His cinema was so abstract and marred by human error, it's an absolute insult to have AI interact with it at all.

This just confirms that MK Ultra was the reason for he Tranny boom, But he resisted it and broke free of it

I thought you were pretending to be retarded but I was wrong, you're just Indian.

Makes me think of the Silent Hill 2 remake, with all the same tasteless shit eaters waiting to chow down.

artists making art vs tech industry making art

youtu.be/ngZ0K3lWKRc?si=prnHi_ZF2c_RR9Ix

art died a long time ago

I didn't even know he was sick.

I can't stand the obstinate stupid expressions on the faces of the people sitting across from him. I feel like there is a large portion of the population that fundamentally will never understand beauty no matter how they try to logic it out and I fear this world where these people control everything in our daily lives and how the world looks.

No lol.

HOLLYWOOD DELENDA EST.

OMNISSIAH VULT!