300: "Don't defend yourself" - bad guy

You're mistaking what it's referring to as the "enemy". It's not referring to those who would invade your territory and try to kill you but rather your neighbor who does you wrong in a lesser way.

The prior gets the sword and the latter gets tolerance. Christianity would not have risen to prominence in the first place had we not instilled it upon other nations with the sword. Nations that then became civilized as a result.

Bottom is a Pope and popes are not kings or soldiers. They're supposed moral authorities that preach a "religion of love" and as such should be above callings for war, racism and xenophobia.
Your fault for worshipping a kike whose biggest feat was getting himself killed. Join the Order of the Nine Angels instead.

bro whenJesus something loving and cringe it was actually an epic based bushido warrior code

chastity
generosity
temperance
forgiveness
humility
contentedness
diligence

preach a "religion of love"

that's just hippie dippie revisionist bullshit
popes were first and foremost a head of state, it required strong leadership, a shrewd diplomatic mind and an eye for administration

Love
Peace
Compassion
Charity
Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentation of their women.

So it's a bullshit religion made by power-hungry kikes. Good to know.

Catholics just outright admitting to be the whore of Babylon now lmao

It was a warrior code, you should learn about the crusades sometime when you're not busy cucking yourself you tremendous nigger faggot

Are you fucking stupid OP?

What do europeans doing something literally 1000 years removed from christ have to do with scripture? Everything you actually admire about christianity was just Europeans reinterpreting it to fit their own inclinations. GG

Yeah I notice you only watch shit movies

I'm a hypocrite and you've reinterpreted it in a way that I don't like, I like my way more because it involves me being a hippie dippie cuck fag

what does a lamentation sound like

Now see, when crusaders were slaughtering their fellow Christians in the holy land, they were living accordingly to Jesus's sermon on the mount.
Than you, Iberian_Conquistador1488.

I see a unified people coming together to spread a civilized belief system through predominately uncivilized territories by means of force. A series of events that took place much closer to A.D. than what's going on now so obviously a much less diluted interpretation than what le reddit "christ was really on our side" fags seem to be positing.

Lotr is inherently Christian.

If Tolkien were alive today, he'd be RETVRN posting little dark age edits on twitter. His christianity was the same aesthetic larp fantasizing about medieval as tradcels.

It was a warrior code, you should learn about the crusades

bunch of savages that went on a rampage, accomplished nothing and killed thousands of Christians?

I see a unified people coming together to spread a civilized belief system through predominately uncivilized territories by means of force.

And that's so disingenuous that you're assuredly coping for being mestizo.

famously uncivilized territory of Constantinople

ur being disingenuous (one of the only big words i know) but i wont say how or why bc im a pseud

Conclave: "Don't defend yourself" - good guy

I didn't quite get the ending, was he a troon? Or just hideously deformed in the genital area?

Muslims were more civilized than Christians then as now

t. hamas supporter

He was a boy born with an uterus. Instead of going through a surgery or trooning, he accepted himself as a man with a deformity.

He was a boy born with an uterus

you mean a girl

catholic

not pagan

At the end of the day, the priorities of natural survivalism are incompatible with the pursuit of spiritual grace, with the sole and only exception of national socialism, which effortlessly combines the two by making race into God.

The notion that showing mercy to the merciless is graceful at all is mentally fucking retarded. There's nothing noble about allowing horrible, violent people to continue to abuse you and others. It's completely possible to oppose harmful, evil people without becoming le evil and harming innocents yourself.

No he's one of those rare intersex people who had male genitalia and a uterus. He's lived his life as a man.

have you guys ever read The Ballad oif the Goodly Fere
it's a very technically good very accomplished poem, it has some techniques in it that are used very efectively BUT more than that
I feel like it reflects a human aspect of Jesus Christ in a way that nothing else does, least to mention the actual bible
but I think it's a humanity that the Church has to come to recognise and embrace if they're going to interest people in faith again
It's always bugged me about how we are taught about Jesus, he is the God in Man, the Man in God whatever. But
like what are the ways in which he's like God: he has magical powers, he's very wise, he has divine grace, etc. like all the good things about Jesus are ascribed to the elements of him that are of God
And then in what ways are he like Man, well he's mortal, he loses his temper at the jews in the temple, he feels fear, he suffers etc.
al;l the ways in which Jesus' human nature manifest are negative, they are all the fallibilities of man
But I think what the church needs, oir what the Christian faith needsa, whatever, is to stop telling people the ways they suck and start celebrating the ways that huamnity is great, God made us the way we are for a reason, and I think it would be good if we could start seeing those reasons in the way scripture is taught and understood
ok

The notion that showing mercy to the merciless is graceful at all is mentally fucking retarded.

But it isn't. You're thinking like someone who cares about living, while you should be thinking like someone who exists to be part of God's grace in spirit.
You can choose to make your priority life on Earth, or you can choose to make your priority to be with God in heaven. Only the Nazis have ever figured out how to do both because only they have ever accomplished elevating an earthly concept such as "my people" to a deific status, something modern ethnostatists such as the jews and arabs have never been able to accomplish because of a lack of spiritual geist gesundheit.

Britannica: The objectives of the Crusades were to check the spread of Islam, to retake control of the Holy Land, to conquer pagan areas, and to recapture formerly Christian territories. The Crusades were seen by many of their participants as a means of redemption and expiation for sins.

According to you: it was a war with the intent of killing ourselves.

If what you say was true, Christianity would not have become the de facto religion of the new world.

You're thinking like someone who cares about living, while you should be thinking like someone who exists to be part of God's grace in spirit.

pffft

didn't read past that, psycho death cultist

The logical conclusion of your idea is that Man ceases to be an entity whose purpose is to find purpose in being with God, and instead to pursue self-actualisation as a human being. Within a finite number of steps, God is then removed from the question and agnosticism is reached; not only does this go against the goals of the Church, it also doesn't make sense as a religious position at all and is for this reason immediately at risk of being subverted by extreme political ideologies taking advantage of the lack of faith in thusly despiritualized people.

harmful, evil people

Anon Babble users are evil people

talking about anime, tv and videogames is evil

?

But you can approach the situation from the position of observing the limitations of this world compared to the world beyond. The exaltation of the human condition in this form of life doesn't preclude the exalting of a God beyond us whose wonders and visions await past the veil, it just allows for a celebration of the Here and Now as a manifestation of his will. When the primary figure of the faith is celebrated ONLY for his godliness and his manliness is shown ONLY through weakness the logical conclusion is the nihlist outlook of the gnostic dualists, which is a shit fuck. We are a work of God and we should celebrate ourselves and each other through the lens of celebrating God by celebrating his works

You see this kids? This is mental illness.

Based

But you can approach the situation from the position of observing the limitations of this world compared to the world beyond.

You can. But you won't. That's just hard historical fact, and it's been validated repeatedly. The moment Man decides that he should focus on how good he is at eating from the fruit of knowledge, he stops thinking about how he shouldn't have eaten the fruit in the first place.

We are a work of God and we should celebrate ourselves

This is an inevitably atheistic position that leads to vanity and hubris. All things are created by God; being created by God is not and has never been stipulated to be a sufficient condition to be worthy of celebration. Choosing to be one with God, the function of belief, the purity of faith in God - that is from the onset the purpose of Christianity and is its highest ideal. You cannot take that out of Christianity and have it remain as Christianity. In the doctrine of Christianity, you are not good simply by being, you are good by being saved by the saveour. The saveour takes precedence over the saved, every time.

the logical conclusion is the nihlist outlook of the gnostic dualists, which is a shit fuck

The critical and essential aspects of such a faith as Christianity is that it allows you to neglect both logic and survival in favor of faith. You either sit and think about these things and so remove yourself from Christianity, or you are Christian and you do not need to drive yourself mad with reason. These are completely different worlds.

The critical and essential aspects of such a faith as Christianity is that it allows you to neglect both logic and survival in favor of faith.

...and this isn't insanity?

refuting Jesus' pacifism by citing the actions of medieval Europeans

Tradcucks are literally retarded.

Not within the religious paradigm, because within the religious paradigm God exists and so it isn't insane to believe in God. Obviously.

pol/ exists and robert hawkins was a Anon Babble user

I don't know what the fuck a paradigm is, but judging from the way you used it, I'd assert that anything beyond living in the "reality" paradigm is insanity and shouldn't be entertained.

Your mistake is thinking it was christianity keeping europe alive and not castles, knights and and a decent supply of high quality steel.

That's fine, but you can agree that whether or not God is part of reality makes a difference to what is insane and what isn't?

The only reason absolute monarchy worked, and thus provided all those things, was because Johnny Peasant believed he was chosen by God to rule

I can barely comprehend whatever your sentence is supposed to mean, but I don't see the point in caring about God existing if believing in him requires you put logic and survival behind. Even if he did, if he told me something that went against that, I wouldn't listen to him.

dude just cut your foreskin off, drink wine on this specific day and worship me!

No fuck off.

feudalism

absolute monarchy

Holy shit a retard.

Ok? So you're not Christian, good for you I guess? Why are you involved in this conversation if your only contribution is to tell us all that you're not Christian? I'm an atheist too, I'm discussing the religious mindset as fairly as possible, and all you have to say is

wow I'm such a not christian, imagine being christian, how stupid

If what you're saying is of no interest to me, do you have any idea how pointless your point is to an actual believer?

I'm voicing my opinion that the mindset you are describing is insane, dangerous and shouldn't be respected at all. I'll stick my nose where I please and you can eat my ass with a side of fries if you don't like it.

Maybe you should go back, you'll get plenty of upvotes.

I'll stay where I am and you'll continue to be asshurt about it for no reason.

I'm not relying to you anymore.

Pacifism as in respect thine neighbor, don't steal, don't lie, don't envy, not "don't retaliate if sand niggers are literally trying to kill you".

Christianity would not even be a thing today if we followed this extremist form of pacifism that you're referring to.

Spartan were fags (Greeks were as a whole) and the world would've been a better place had Persia succeeded.

oy gevalt delete this right now goy

Christ literally let himself be killed. What part of to conquer death you only have to die do you not understand?

Christianity would not even be a thing today if people were actually christian

Yes. It's kind of funny how that works.

christ also whipped the fuck out of merchants desecrating His temple

so all those parts in the bibble about holy war being justified are???

*synagogue

Where does Jesus mention that?

Okay so go back to le reddit and tout how you're a "true Christian" and then kill yourselves so we can be rid of 2 more cucks/jeets/niggers/whatever the fuck you are and one step closer to unifying against a common enemy once again.