Is there really any justifiable reason for his videos being as long as they are...

according to these idiots objects that fall out of an artificial gravity field should just immediately stop in zero G

He doesn't say that. You would know that if you actually watched it.

It was discussed in detailed retard mode during some EFAP shit, not the solo video.

Not in that video, it was some of the podcast shit with multiple idiots, none objecting.

Guys guess what? You aren't going to believe this. The latest Disneyslop is...BAD!!!

People give this retard money btw

Here, watch this 4 hour slogfest of autistic nitpicking, I now know it by heart, this is my life.

It's truly amazing how popular these videos are among those who never touch grass.

It was Jesse Plemons all along?!

This isn't YMS.

Every now and then they invite a single (as retarded as possible) guest from the opposite bubble to collectively verbally gangbang and pretend superiority. So mature, so intelligent. Pathetic waste desu.

I miss E;R videos, now he just chud posts on twitter

gonna cry because your favorite libtard got owned?

his cohost is an even bigger degenerate furry than yms. also his former cohost was a furry as well and was caught grooming a 16 year old.

autistic incel noises

Yes, thats why all called both bubbles retards. Next time ask mommy upstairs to help you comprehend the text.

learn to type before telling anyone to learn to read, cupcake

And another one is a convicted drug dealer that leeched off of schools.

They invited Synthetic Man on and then sõyed out when he said he'd only talk to Mauler and not do a 3-on-1 dogpile. They're cowardly sissies.

Mid wit IQ with dunning Kruger syndrome. Brevity is the soul of wit.

The quote suggests that a witty or intelligent statement is often best delivered in a concise and to-the-point manner. Long-winded or overly elaborate speech can be seen as dull or even foolish.

look, a typo!

Mommy taught you that one, didnt she, incel? What a meaningful argument! Nice job, fag!

another retard misses the actual point of "Brevity is the soul of wit"

Never understood why and how insecure manchildren can be so protective of their favorite halfwit autists of yt. At least be mad about something meaningful every now and then.

You must have plenty of time for grammar alone in the basement. Lol

Can't you just cry a river in the corner of your room because your capeshit got woke? Do we really need to memorize 100 hours of incel whining?

The problem here is that you could rip apart literally any fucking movie by over analyzing every scene in autistic detail. His nit picking is redundant and down right ridiculous. I’m not smart enough to fully articulate how retarded Mauler is, but I’m aware that he is absolutely garbage at criticism and can’t look at the full picture when it comes to movie making. Sometimes plot holes and inconsistencies are required to tell a good story and ultimately don’t matter in the grand scheme of things. But he goes in and spends 12 hours nit picking every single word and character action, it’s actually mental illness personified in video form, and the fact that he has people watching him proves we have a serious mental illness problem in western countries.

retards watch a 5 hour review of a 2 hour movie which they didn't even like in the first place

DISNEYSLOP IS SHIT AND HERES WHY (PART 13) (4:53:02)

Will never forgive this fag for turning Jon CJG into a chud and sucking every ounce of comedy from his soul in the process.

whom?

This. It's amazing how lack of talent replaced by the confidence of retards rules media and criticism. YMS is also irritating but he at least does make some actual points about filmmaking every now and then. The EFAP garbage dump of influencers is just the fastfood of reviewing. No real effort, unhealthy, fake, easy to digest for any idiot.

Nerdrotic, the guy preaching about how kids media is ruined now. Lmao.

you could rip apart literally any fucking movie by over analyzing every scene in autistic detail.

false. though even if I were to grant you that all movies have flaws (which isn't what you said btw retard), that doesn't mean they are all equally flawed.

The point is that what and how they critique is retarded and totally missing the point of what a review or discussion should be about.

"oh but in this shot we see Kylo Ren's left nutsack when it should be in fact the right. Disney much bad, omg, woke"

Here, I helped you process the text you were too retarded to do alone. You're welcome.

totally missing the point of what a discussion should be about.

what did retard mean by this? you aren't allowed to discuss the writing of films?

Early Arby n the chief seasons

South Park meets Toy Story

stand alone episodes where the toys get into shenanigans around Johns apartment

5-8 minutes long. Meaty bite sized episodes that got to the point.

What Arby n the Chief turned into

Arbiter is an outlet for John to share his political beliefs and ideas with the audience (nobody cares)

episodes are now 45 minutes long and 95% of them take place in Halo Reach theatre mode

seasons are now one continuous bloated self important story about about a hacker or cyber terrorist in Halo Reach or some shit

LE STRONG WOMAN CHARACTER/LOVE INTEREST FOR ARBITER

Chief is the WACKY side kick and comic relief to Arbiters serious lead role like some cheesy ass Hollywood blockbuster

”please take my Halo Reach machinima drama seriously”

here’s me, JON GRAHAM, self inserting myself into my show and giving an incredibly cringy and intentionally awful performance so I can be immune to criticism!!!! Haha! I’m so humble and just having fun!!!

I mean I don’t know what the fuck happened here but this show became unwatchable when he went in this direction. And he defends this decision by saying it’s “intellectually” challenging, while downplaying the earlier seasons as dumb and silly.

But because a movie or story has logistical flaws in the exact concrete logic of the story doesn't automatically make it a bad movie or story.
What the movie invokes in the audience is what should actually be the biggest criticism for or against a movie. Doing a twelve hour one sided conversation about every individual moment is a trees from the forest issue.

for turning Jon CJG into a chud

What? I was under the impression he was a center left retard who seethed about politics generally? In any case the dude's a dweeb and the last time any of his content was any good was when big M Machinima as a media entity was still a thing.

There won't be any "well written" films that pass a word by word breakdown of the entire script for "plot holes" or inconsistencies.
But I can tell you why Transformers 2 has badly written dialogue and why Reservoir Dogs has good dialogue for how the dialogue inspires emotions in the audience.

Actually discussing the writing of the films instead of nitpicking every single minor shit in the most autistic, retarded way would be preferred.
But that would be too much to ask from these mentally handicapped fools I guess. Says a lot about their audience how you think this bloated tat is what "discussing writing" is. Reviewing proper movies instead of constantly dissecting the newest capeshit junk would also help.

He flipped after meeting Mauler & Co.

You actually sit in your mothers house and listen to some autistic freak nit pick 2 hour movies for 12 hours, don’t you?

doesn't automatically make it a bad movie or story.

I don't believe they say that it does? they don't claim to provide a comprehensive overview of films as a whole. regardless, what makes a movie good or bad is subjective. all they do is highlight objective flaws in the writing. if quality of writing isn't something that influences your opinion of a film then so be it. on the other hand saying that film analysis SHOULD be one particular way is incredibly reductive. would you say that a channel focusing on costume or set design is "missing the forest for the trees"? they can talk about whatever they're passionate about, in this case it happens to be scriptwriting.

Totally not political. That's why they refer to one character from The Last Jedi to as "the fat asian bitch". Holy cope.

And on top of that, the only movies he is willing to watch is blockbuster slop just to complain they are shit like we didn't already know.

It's less a review and more of a Frodo meme "Why didn't they x" going through the movie scene by scene before a general look back.

Works for someone who hasn't seen the movie at all.

There won't be any "well written" films that pass a word by word breakdown of the entire script for "plot holes" or inconsistencies.

what about the films that they do praise?

But I can tell you why Transformers 2 has badly written dialogue and why Reservoir Dogs has good dialogue for how the dialogue inspires emotions in the audience.

no you can't. if I say that optimus prime's speech evoked more emotion than any scene in reservoir dogs then your argument is effectively meaningless.

The value of the criticism they do is equal to evaluating Tolstoy by the amount of letter E-s in War and peace. Referring to bloopers as shit writing is missing the point. Ripping apart capeshit and never reviewing anything worthwhile gives no real context. Focusing on minute details, dragging on the discussion, diluting any real point they may accidentally bump into is pathetic. Pulling the most retarded defenses of the criticized films to appear as 'le smarter' is just small dick energy in full power.
It really is all just junk food of movie criticism for the sake of clicks and ad revenue. No real value there. Honestly tried to listen to these podcasts but it's just too painful how moronic and full of psychological issues it all is.

Okay but when is he uploading more of that Force Awakens series? Is he even still working on that at this point?

nitpicking every single minor shit in the most autistic, retarded way

why can't you do both? I don't see why nitpicks aren't valid criticism. they're part of the film and if they could have been done better then they ought to be. not saying you have to care about nitpicks, but there are films that do pay close attention to detail and are often praised for it, so why is the inverse not worthy of critique?

the only one that justified it was that hbomberguy refutation. the sheer autism on display was fantastic, one ultra pedantic nerd systematically picking apart every single point of another nerd's dark souls video essay ended up being some kind of meta parody of the pointlessness of over important long form youtube essays

Besides Rick Worley, is there anyone else actually provides interesting film criticism? The stuff I find on the internet is constantly shit.

That's the best part, movies they praise usually have mostly same issues. They fucking praised Spiderman Homecoming and Infinity war.
Usually what they nitpick and what their actual issues are with the content are in two completely different baskets.
Lol, lmao even.

actually provides

actually providing*

f I say that optimus prime's speech evoked more emotion than any scene in reservoir dogs then your argument is effectively meaningless.

If you genuinely believed that and wanted to have a conversation about it then sure but that'd be a conversation in good faith by two people which is actually the best way to conduct anything critical.

This is why twelve hour one sided critics don't hold up. They aren't challenged on anything they say and can brush past their weaker critics that they make just to fill the air.
There isn't anything purely objective with writing dialogue but I'm assuming I'm in a conversation with another rational human so I'd be able to get why I find the dialogue in RD more successful in what's it is trying to accomplish then what the dialogue in TF2 is trying to do.

Because they literally only nitpick factory produced capeshit fairytales. It's like analyzing the running pattern of a war veteran with one leg. Completely moronic and missing the point, ultimate waste of time.

How do you think his short film screenplay will turn out?

About as good as Critical Drinker's movie.
Mid at best, but probably just cringe.

Probably better than the average hollyweird slop but that really isn't a high bar these days.

when he said he'd only talk to Mauler and not do a 3-on-1 dogpile

Did they justify why they wouldn't accept? I would like to see that if you have a link.

you didn't address anything I said, just long windedly reiterated your earlier post.

No. But his Snyder Cut review was still entertaining. Might watch it again now

do you believe those movies are the same as the ones they dump on strictly because they're in the same genre? and they gave plenty of negative critique to the two movies you mentioned for the record.

-this autistic nitpicking is not "criticism of scriptwriting", there's a clear difference
-spamming meaningless criticism dilutes any potential point they might accidentally make

Here, dumbed it down for you. Funny how you have an issue with "long" texts while defending this sea of hours long meaningless tat.

there is no justification for watching any youtuber

90% of their videos are in this capeshit genre, what are you even trying to say, lmao. These are the ones they praise, full of plotholes, inconsistencies, goofs and sloppy plot vehicles. Aren't these the factors they nitpick all the time? Now mention some movies they hold to near perfect level. Those probably hold up relatively poorly from an autistic standpoint as well. On this level of "criticism" the original star wars is just as retarded as TLJ because "the exhaust just happens to be there" and shit. This is what meaningless, low effort content is, pretending to be insightful review.

so your argument is "x is subjectively better than y, and anyone that disagrees is a bad faith liar".

They aren't challenged on anything they say and can brush past their weaker critics that they make just to fill the air.

what about when they argue amongst themselves, argue with their chat, invite dissenting guests on to have conversations, etc.?

find the dialogue in RD more successful in what's it is trying to accomplish then what the dialogue in TF2 is trying to do.

what if someone feels more excitement from the action scenes in transformers 2 than the action scenes in reservoir dogs and excitement is what they want from movies?

No, it applies here as well midwit. Mauler isn’t intellectually capable enough to get his point across in 20 minutes when it comes to reviewing a 2 hour movies. He has to go frame by frame and spend 10 minutes alone over analyzing a single piece of dialogue that took the actor 3 seconds to say and has no significant impact on the plot. It’s childish. It’s absolute insanity. You will never be able to convince me his 12 hour review of the force awakens isn’t complete and total mental illness.

If they give plenty, close to the same amount of "critique" of this kind to the movies they like, that just proves that the shit they discuss for hours with no end is not what makes a movie good or bad and is ultimately futile and stupid. Thanks for confirming that.

this autistic nitpicking is not "criticism of scriptwriting", there's a clear difference

once again, you failed to demonstrate why. you likened it to something that is completely arbitrary without qualification of any sort.

spamming meaningless criticism dilutes any potential point they might accidentally make

highlighting poor writing is not meaningless. stories should follow logic and make sense.

what if someone feels more excitement from the action scenes in transformers 2.......

Then that is a better dialogue for that person then it is for me. Do you want to have a honest conversation about your feelings about what the Transformer movies' dialogue inspired in you?
I'm not saying "x is ......." I'm saying you are inventing people in this thread to participate in a conversation between two people.

what about when they argue amongst themselves, argue with their chat, invite dissenting guests on to have conversations, etc.?

I don't think you are talking about Muller videos anymore or video film essays.

What is a very well written movie in your opinion anon?
Believe this is bait waiting for me to automatically go "UMMMM BUT ACTUALLY" but write up a post as if you are in a good faith conversation with someone about something you actually find good and try and convince them of your point of view.
We've been talking for like half an hour at this point we may as well try and move this along.

These are the ones they praise, full of plotholes, inconsistencies, goofs and sloppy plot vehicles.

but they are better than their contemporaries. again, there are no films with perfect writing, but this does not magically make all films equal in this aspect.

If they give plenty, close to the same amount

do I need to explain why this is a pants-on-head retarded sentence?

If you seriosuly don't understand what the difference is between cirticism of quality of writing and overanalyzing the most minor shit, there is no helping you either. Stories have suspense of disbelief especially in the case of the childish fairytales they are actually willing to review. It's retarded to go into the most mainstream slop and expect ultimate realistic masterpieces. Somehow they avoid proper adult movies. Anythinf they actually like could be torn apart the very same way.

Then that is a better dialogue for that person then it is for me.

right but you were claiming that the mark of a film's quality is it's ability to inspire emotion in it's audience and I'm saying that this standard is purely subjective and holds no more inheret merit than mauler's or anyone else's standards.

you are inventing people in this thread to participate in a conversation between two people.

are you asking me if I want to talk about reservoir dogs or transformers 2? I don't.

One of the most amusing things is that the fat fuck was defending the wheedon Justice League is because he was forced to watch buffy because his sister did and became obsessed with it, not that I care much about the pajeetslop that is the sunder cut

They are better for different reasons. Yet their review is still mostly about the meaningless shit. Infinity war is just as nonsensical as most of capeshit but the mood, the pacing and the charisma. These are things they spend no time on and instead blabber about how realistic a normal guy superhero landing from a rooftop is. Lmao.

I'm saying that this standard is purely subjective and holds no more inheret merit than mauler's or anyone else's standards.

So we are agreeing with each other that film criticism is subjective and only works when it takes place in a good faith conversation.
Something that a twelve hour video essay is absolutely not.

And the funniest part is when a third completely new nerd comes in to refute Mauler's every point with autistic detail.
Also the fact that hbomber's video is, in itself, a response to yet another nerd. Dark Souls 2 discourse is like an onion, it has layers.

Try, but first ask mommy for second opinion, snowflake.

It doesn't take RLM 5 hours to tell you why a movie is bad.

It doesnt take more than a second if you want to, nothing needs to be long if you want to, here

Star Wars TLJ is shit

Done, this is my review, now, how much you want to expand on that opinion is up to the one reviewing it.

The justifiable reason is that he likes to do so, and other people like hearing it for that long.

what the difference is between cirticism of quality of writing and overanalyzing the most minor shit,

you can do both and both are equally valid topics to be interested in.

Stories have suspense of disbelief especially

come on don't be so fucking lazy man. you know that suspension of disbelief doesn't mean that stories can be totally untethered from any sense of logic.

A accurate character description is not political.

People like watching netflix slop as well, that doesn't mean it's good. The argument isn't whether hours should or could be spent on the manner. The question is if it adds or removes any potential value. Sadly this is mostly bloated slop with little to no real points.

Thanks, Hitler.

both are equally valid topics to be interested in.

No they are not because dialogue is not the individual words said but the emotion invoked from those words via their combination and the acting out of them and the emotions these combined sounds invoke in the audience.
Yes this breaks your mind in that it is subjective but it is still true.

Jaws

we’re going to need a bigger boat

Mauler

”UMMM, first of all, why wouldnt they bring a bigger boat to begin with seeing is how they were aware they’re up against a deadly shark? I mean was this small boat really all they could take out to sea? Chief Brody even saw the sharks length in the pond when it ate that guy in the boat, so he had a sense for how big the shark was. Or why not just take the boat back to shore and then get a bigger boat and come back out to sea? Surely they weren’t THAT far away from shore, only like a couple hours at most. It’s not like they weren’t required to stay out at sea. They foolishly decided to stay on the small boat and take their chances and look what happened. This is just bad screenwriting and it’s only happening for the sake of drama. In reality, these men would go back to shore and get a bigger boat and maybe more equipment to prepare themselves for this battle. And why is Chief Brody there? He’s just a police chief, he’s not a fisherman. He has no business being on the boat. He even openly says he hates the water! In reality, someone as experienced as Quinn would take along with him another experienced fisherman. I mean Chief Brody doesn’t even like the water, so why would Quinn allow Brody on the boat knowing he’s afraid of water? Doesn’t that make him a liability? A hazard? Wouldn’t someone like Quinn know a city man like Brody would only get in the way? This clearly wasn’t thought out very well by the writers.

You're welcome, Mao.

Thats a strawman right there. Pointing out completely unreal, illogical plot shifts is fine, these videos are mostly not about that however. Besides, informed, well constructed criticism of filmmaking and nitpicking will never represent equal value.

Something that a twelve hour video essay is absolutely not.

why? how long is film analysis allowed to be before it crosses over into bad faith territory?

Touché

This whole post btw is good dialogue because I get what anon's opinion on Mauler is without him explicitly stating it anywhere in the post.
I know this is a subjective opinion but being a human being with emotions and assumed intellect I "get it".

Probably somewhere WELL OVER THREE TIMES THE LENGTH OF THE FUCKING MOVIE itself.

The original question was whether it was justifiable, not whether it was good or if it had value, regardless, even if we take that that was the original question, the answer remains the same, it adds potential value to those who enjoy long-winded reviews rather than short, more vague but concise ones.

Using a similar comparison would be the difference between reading the resume of a scientific paper, which all of them have at the start so people who just want a quick glance on what it is about and the results of it (aka the vital stuff) can know quickly, or you can go and read the 100+ pages of all the process, from the scientific basis to the methodology, to the research itself and all the way to the results.

it is absolutely not a strawman. poor writing is poor writing regardless of how minor of a detail it is. attention to detail is an admirable characteristic for a film to have and screeching that it's nitpicking and to just ignore it is retarded.

And the defense is always

i-if you don't like it d-d-don't watch it!!!

Motherfucker you're the one making a 12 hour video about something you don't like yet continue to engage with, where the fuck is your self-awareness. What are you doing a fucking public service by putting out shitty bloated takedowns of things six years after everyone else has moved on?

if I spend three minutes discussing a one minute scene is this bad criticism? why?

Please elaborate on how much more intelligent you are than us. I'll wait.

Dunno give us you spending three minutes discussing a one minute scene and I'll tell you what I think of your criticism.
Mauler in his twelve hour critic of the new Star Wars movies goes into details just to fill air rather then contribute to his overall argument.

People need to stop focusing on the length itself when the problem is the criticism is just shitty and repetitive. The issue isn't the length on its own, the issue is that most of the content that makes up that length adds no substance.
It's shit like this And completely dogshit editing that causes the same point to be repeated seventeen times over the course of the video and bloats it over something that isn't even really a relevant point to begin with.
There's nothing wrong with a three hour video about a one hour movie, the problem is when that video wastes your fucking time.

I'm an extremely tl;dr fag myself, so I totally get this man. A lot of it is caused by being able to predict reactions and counterarguments and wanting to address them all at the same time, or otherwise just wanting to be clear about what you are saying, (which takes you on a lot of asides - which is why I tend to write in run-on sentences with brackets upon brackets, and shit like that).

What I don't like is his furfaggot mates he streams with whose opinions nobody asked fora and otherwise aren't worth a damn. All they do is take time away from him making actual interesting long-form content instead of lazy annoying stream-slop.

This feels like two people talking about the same thing anon.
The stupid length is because of poor editing and lack of something to cut him off when he is repeating himself.
But the poor editing and lack of proper scripting is what makes the videos too long to be effect criticisms.

Just say it's repetitive instead of long, because saying it's long sounds like a silly criticism.

Yep. Anyone can do this type of criticism. It’s the easiest laziest type of criticism ever. And his videos are 5-12 hours of it. It never goes beyond this surface level nit picky trash. Maybe I should start my own review channel and start grifting on these low IQ movie fans.

once again, minor is not synonymous with meaningless, and he doesn't have any compulsion to make any broad overarching argument. if any sperg wants to autistically fixate on laser guns in star wars than that's their prerogative and it's equally valid as caring about any other aspect of a film.

In terms of film minor is usually meaningless. If your focus of "New Star Wars is bad because _____" and what you hyper focus on is the laser guns not being scientifically canonically logical and ignore that it doesn't inspire heroism or adventure or better arguments you are making a worse criticism then you could and should be assuming you are a rational human being capable of emotions rather then having to have everything be in an objective format.

Are there actual MauLer fans ITT? Guy's a proven fraud. His ds2 8 part series is full of mistakes and manufactured situations to make the game seem worse.
Him and the entire critic sphere are always in bad faith because they never review anything with an open mind and will do anything to justify their stances. Since he can't change a movie, he nitpicks every insignificant detail.

No the only anon ITT arguing in favor of Mauler is clearly not familiar with his content and is using this thread as an exercise in trying to enforce pure rationality onto everything.

Poor writing is when the writing sinks below a certain threshold. Acting like individual details could indicate poor writing if they have no major effect on the plot is simply retarded.

Ignoring the difference between one minute and two and a half hours is ill and dishonest intent in istelf, lmao.

and what you hyper focus on is the laser guns not being scientifically canonically logical and ignore that it doesn't inspire heroism or adventure

you can do both and mauler does, because effective writing is how you convey these sorts of concepts. making it out that he only discusses minor nitpicks is simply a lie. the bulk of his videos is discussing character motivations. and the existence of larger problems does not obsolve minor problems of their flaws. you're advocating for films to have worse writing for some reason. it's a false dichotomy, you can have good writing at both the macro and micro levels.

Except they dont really put in the work to come to major conclusions its just surfice level slop about manistream media all the way through. It's like trying to light the same candle for four hours. Its an easy task, executed poorly. Anything can be justified as pong it doesn't harm or indicate harm on others so that's just a boring question, going into the point of it all is better. It will always be "okay" to make meaningless content whether its autistic movie reviews or netflix trash series.

Acting like individual details could indicate poor writing if they have no major effect on the plot is simply retarded.

what do you mean by this? the events that transpire in a film make up the plot. how can something in a movie not affect the plot?

what if I made a video that was comprised of 3 minute segments discussing 1 minute clips from the film?

Obvious ill intent as you arbitrarily segment the film into segments that otherwise do not represent the pacing.

The question is how major the role is. For example lamenting over how in a movie x avenger is not called in to assist the current protagonist for several minutes is just cringe. Again, if the expectation is perfect realism, why only discuss factory produced fairytale slop?

a film critique needs to reflect the pacing of the film? is discussing individual lines from a film ill intent as well?

Longest prequel review is RoTS which is 1h 40 mins.

It is of you do one on literally every line, lol.

The question is how major the role is.

if it could be done well, why argue for it being done poorly? a logical inconsistency that has little to no effect on the rest of the film is still bad in it's own right. if you don't care about it, fine. that doesn't make it inconsequential, it exists in the film.

the expectation is perfect realism, why only discuss factory produced fairytale slop?

who cares? maybe they're invested in the franchise, maybe they resonate with the tropes and themes of the genre. they could watch my little pony or teletubbies for all I care.

If he didn't brand his takes as "objective criticism" I don't think people would hate him as much. But he's also a fat faggot and hangs out with trannies, I don't think there's any chance of humbling his ego atp

There won't be any "well written" films that pass a word by word breakdown of the entire script for "plot holes" or inconsistencies.

12 angry men

So your argument regarding movies is "everything should be perfect" , on the other hand regarding this effortless slop of a criticism if it is valid you argue "who cares". Some double standards you have, my dude.

12 Angry Men is the worst example of a movie having holes, holy shit. The dude sneaks a fucking knife into a jury room, for Christ's sake. One juror takes it upon himself to hijack an entire case and argue facts not in evidence to what is essentially a group held hostage. I have never seen such a blatant excuse for a mistrial in my life.

Ahh but Fringy every member just happens to be a different persona, conviniently fitting together without any of the 12 people being really boring or unimportant

So the film doesn't mean to say that boy is innocent it just says even if there's 1 percent doubt that he may be then we can't call him guilty which is fare, but these doubts have so many logical problems for me and I think at points film thinks it's smarter than it is.
And idk what to say, i mean sure if i was there I'd atleast have some doubts, but the amount of suspension of disbelief this film wants me to take is too much for me, I'm sorry.
The boy's knife fell out of the pocket right ? So did anyone mention checking this pocket ? What he was wearing at that time ? Whether there was a hole at all ? It would've been a solid proof for him but film doesn't care to explain.
Next thing The boy forgot the movie name, actor etc when police asks him he does not remember anything which is fair because of trauma affecting memory capability, but after 3 months he does ? how is it that his memory got better in those 3 months ? He could tell every detail all of a sudden ?
My disbelief is so suspended also what trauma are we talking?
Main character says he's been all of his life right had a tough life so having being beaten another time must not have been something unique or extraordinary for him at first then says getting two slaps was traumatising for him ? My guy getting two slaps isn't that traumatising, pick a lane, even if we were talking about the most sensitive person it can't be that traumatising for him to forget about a film all of a sudden, which the boy wasn't he threw a rock at teacher at a young age ( boy was hardcore)

ok seeing a dead body is definitely trauma too right but man how did bro forget all of 2-3 hours he spent watching the film , two slaps got his head so bad that whole movie he couldn't focus ?

Etc

Based.

It doesn't take RLM 5 hours

True, it takes RLM just few minutes to suck off Disney.

Yeah, you just proved how futile and senseless these EFAP autism-fests are. As seen above, an excellent movie could be torn to shreds with this method the same way a piece of shit Transformers 16 could be.

I DON'T FUCK DOGS

waaaaaaah CJG was a tranny just like me and my reddit friends

mauler still making troons seethe in 2025

chef's kiss

So he can gish gallop so many weak arguments that it seems like he is right and nobody can be bothered wasting time countering.

Right wing guy who despite loving Trump has a gimp suit for an avatar with a key hole bdsm mask and 100% a furfag and don't look at whats on his hard drive

gish galop

And other epic filterfriendly Twitch buzzwords, like slop, bro, cooking, or reactionary, zoom zoom?

right wing how?

you are literally a tranny. only an HRT addled freak calls normal, left leaning liberals "right wing"

What is going on here? Context?

no, my argument is that filmmakers should strive for perfection and their efforts should be judged accordingly.

on the other hand regarding this effortless slop of a criticism if it is valid you argue "who cares".

incoherent. rephrase please.

Chudman was going to rightfully call them fags and trannies and he couldn't have that on his heckin wholesome center right grifting channel

Mauler is just cinemasins for autists

It was funny though how quickly they feigned outrage at Synthetic Chud calling them faggots and trannies even though it's literally a meme in their community to call people "massives" (short for massive faggot). They had a full blown reddit moment when that part came up in the video kek.

So chudwoman wanted to just spew shit and be wrong? Damn, that is so novel in its circles.

synthetic

Is that the unironic virgin who fails at Sony State of Play games?

Is that the unironic virgin

Based

fails at Sony State of Play games?

Based
Yep that sounds like based Synth alright

I don't like this guy because of how long his reviews are but I'm surprised he makes trannys seethe this much. Are there people who are die hard Star Wars sequel fans and are smart enough to solve the captchas?

Is there really any justifiable reason for his videos being as long as they are?

To hammer home the point how bad the shit he's reviewing is.

Why don't the same overly idealistic early-college level "standards" apply to review-slop? Lol. Anyway, name one close to perfect movie and watch anons rip it apart.

review-slop

I don't know what you mean by this

name one close to perfect movie and watch anons rip it apart

that would be redundant because I don't think any movie is perfect and beyond critique, just that there exist varying levels of writing quality. I've said this like three times now.

Yeah, she is a fat asian bitch. Thats an accurate description anon. Calling a bitch a bitch ain’t political. But Mauler is a retard for other reasons.

Honestly, I could talk about Jenny for 12hrs too!

did he come up with his avatar when he was a cringy 12 year old and never got around to changing it?

All hail the queen

I cant help your reading comprehension, dude. Try guessing what I mean by review-slop, user your noggin.

By close to perfect I mean the best you can name. I'm seriously starting to think I'm talking to a single lonely braincell here.

Okay incel, mom surely appreciates your take upstairs.

Are there actual human beings irl that watch 5 hour videos on why the Last Jedi was bad

Try guessing what I mean by review-slop

it's more the context that you used it in.
no. explain yourself using big boy words or don't expect a response.

By close to perfect I mean the best you can name

to what end? to prove that good media is still not perfect? I've already conceded that point, multiple times in fact. this seems like a fruitless endeavor.

I wont explain trivialities, I'm sorry if you didnt manage to process the context.

Regarding better, best movies, if you cant name any that wouldnt be ripped apart the very same way these casual blockbusters are, this just confirms without a doubt that this level of criticism is judt pointless because it fails to properly distinguish trash from treasure. Thanks for proving my point by your direct and indirect concessions in each and every topic.

Autism, autism is the answer

if you cant name any that wouldnt be ripped apart the very same way these casual blockbusters are

what a silly thought experiment you've concocted. you want me to give you a film to be compared to some vague nebulous generalization of "casual blockbusters", so that you can then apply this warped idea you have of mauler's method of analyzing films to said film? it's an exercise in futility because we don't even agree on the fundamental concepts of film or film critique. what do you think we'd achieve here?

He looks wicked smart

Believe it or not, once upon a time people on the political left or center were also able to make jokes without freaking out and crying about it. Those people haven't changed, the overton window has just shifted us into clown world.

Is there really any justifiable reason for his videos being as long as they are?

He wants to make them long. Don't watch it if it's not what you like.

I have proven that you chicken out the moment we could talk in specifics instead of the vague cliché mess you fabricated to protect these autists. They are basically just vomiting out sloppy endless streams with no real value whatsoever. Your blabbering likewise has no real thought behind it, only cheap copout answers like "oh but it's relative"?No it actually isn't, if any of your previous arguments held up at all. They don't, these overy long autistic review-slops are painfully forced and weak, otherwise you could provide proper examples to movies which could pass the test of these nitpicks according to either their and/or your standards. The moment these blockbuster monstrosities stop being overly pretentious (Snyder) or woke (Disney) suddenly are hailed as the next coming of Jesus. Somehow fitting a certain agenda suddenly removes all the little issues that could be nitpicked. Lol, lmao even.

What's the joke there?
If I call you a right leaning incel fag that by itself is funny?
Wow haha, roflmao xd

Boy I hope you dont ever complain about Netflix or Disney either because you might as well just not watch those.

R O B O C O P

uh oh his discord trannies are here to defend him

but you haven't named a single specific review of his or even a single specific argument that he's made which you take umbrage with in this entire thread? what you're proposing is impossible because you haven't even sufficiently outlined what is wrong with his review style. all you've done is speak in generalities. how could you fairly apply his review style to any film I name when we still have opposing opinions on what that review style is? you haven't really thought this through have you?

Nakey Jakey did a 40-ish minute review of Last of Us Part 2 and identified the problems with the game far more succinctly and concisely than Mauler did in his 5+ hour EFAP on the game.

If brevity is the soul of wit, then Mauler is a retard.

HBomber Guy made a 120 minute essay about Dark Souls 2, which triggered Mauler to make a 10 part response clocking in at around 11 hours.

At no point during making his response essay, did Mauler ask himself if he was being a bit deranged.

5 hours

Try nearly 12

Anyone who thinks he's right-wing should look into his feud with Synthetic Man

no, u start

Lmao, nice try. The problem is the general approach, any and every single review is just a flood of nitpicky bs. They have these half a day long discussions mostly about capeshit, demanding realism, only ever talking about "plotholes",they cant even discuss scriptwriting properly because they have no real insight or experience to base anything interesting on. If you can't see how pathetic the whole thing is, there is no help. Its basically a bunch of manchildren constantly shrieking because Cinderella was successfully indentified by her feet size. Lol. I'm glad you are still in chicken mode, full force.

incredibly based. will screencap and use to reply to people who think long, substance-less video = good.

The early episodes are still funny. Ironically he became the "serious guys" he mocked in his early videos.

every single review is just a flood of nitpicky bs.

I disagree with this assessment and the only way we could possibly hurdle this impasse is by you naming a video you take issue with.

demanding realism, only ever talking about "plotholes"

this for instance is simply a lie and implies that you haven't watched any of their content. but there's no way of reconciling this disagreement without specifics from you. and yes the onus does lie on you because you're making the positive claim.

Uh oh troon bros

Shiteating Man is a balding leftoid crying about usual shit like UBI, corporations and minimum wage.

uh oh seething tranny jew

The frustrating part about these halfbrains is that nitpicking could be fun. Going over all the mistakes, no matter how minor could be such a fascinating look into making a movie. With such nitpicking, you can also nitpraise, find all those minor details that nobody notices but help make the movie better. And yet, every single time these brainlets just turn into childish tantrums where they cry because the clouds don't line up between edits. "Oh my god, that's literally raping my childhood. That makes me ANGRY. LITERALLY, literally worse then Jedi. I didn't think it was possible. Congratulations. At least Jedi-." It's fucking pathethic.

If they kept emotional distance or just tried to be fun at least, it'd be great but no. It's them getting legit angry over the dumbest shit. Instead of Youtube equilevant of sitting down to make fun of a shit horror movie in the name of fun, it's genuinely mean spirited. It's too genuinely angry to be worth anything. It's shit content and I'm glad to see it go away. Fucking virgin content.

Just watch it on 2X

I disagree with this assessment and the only way we could possibly hurdle this impasse is by you naming a video you take issue with.

For the final time, their general approach is trash, open their last content, that's the problem. This argument is idiotic, imagine that I claim that I hate the capeshit genre and you attempt a weak reply by asking whether I had problem with Ant Man 3 or Fantastic four reboot number 3. This is when autism meets pure pretentiousness, no wonder you enjoy their pathetic style.

Meanwhile I asked you to name a good movie and you havent managed even that. Pretty low bar, yet you managed to hit your head with it. Classic.

How dare you criticise my favorite women hating autistic film students?

How mentally ill you have to be to watch hours of this shit

then I've shown why your question is a pointless one. if you're unable to explain why their approach is bad beyond "it's just bad in general" then your question realistically can't lead anywhere. all that will happen is I'll name a film, you'll say "they would say _______ about this film" and I'll say "no they wouldn't" and we'll be back at square one. you can't have it both ways, if you wish to discuss specifics then you can't also speak in generalities in the same breath.

I kind of understand listening to this while you game or whatever. But the guys voice is insufferable.

why are grown men having internet fights over kids movies?

There are close to 200 comments here, at least 50 of them explaining in detail what the problem with the approach is. My favorite is the Jaws criticism parody actually. None of their reviews has any consistent structure with any thought put into it its just a "lets go through the movie scene by scene and nitpick everything", that means that even when they hate on a movie I depsise like TLJ, their criticism remains retarded . In the case of Black Panther most can be boiled down to "different culture bad, generic story bad" but for several painful hours. No focus, no structure, endless pretentiousness. (now is the part where you will want quotes I suppose but lets just not go there, its futile). And yes, any movie you might bave mentioned could be ripped apart with this senseless idiotic failed art-student approach, we both know it, thats why you dont even attempt to mention any that could pass this test. Thanks again for proving everything right.

There's nothing wrong with a three hour video about a one hour movie,

Yes there is. Juts make your own movie at that point.

Autism

You had to be there. The collective anger and disappointment had to be released some how. A lot of youtube careers were started over Last Jedi.

As much as I hate Mauler, drinker, anti woke morons. They're infinitely better than any breadtuber. Jesus christ. I'm pretty sure more than half are now trans or some kind of gay fetish person.

RLMs recent BOTW is nearly 2 fucking hours.
There os no reason for 2 hours tallking about shit movies.

None of their reviews has any consistent structure

immediately proceeds to describe the structure they utilize consistently

huh?

And yes, any movie you might bave mentioned could be ripped apart with this senseless idiotic failed art-student approach

no doubt you could attempt to. but the amount of success you'd have would depend on the quality of writing of the film in question. this is assuming that you'd be able to accurately represent their tactics, something you have failed to demonstrate thus far.

now is the part where you will want quotes I suppose but lets just not go there, its futile

yes, it is easier to fabricate lies when you preface them with "I don't have to show any proof btw".

Boy I hope you dont ever complain about Netflix or Disney either because you might as well just not watch those.

I don't because I'm a well-adjusted adult.

Le film connoisseur

mommy look! I have mature adult movies too!

oh my cringe

Calling chronological order dragged out endlessly without any thought a "structure" is rich. Again, no wonder you enjoy these timewasters if you are so easily satisfied.

no doubt you could attempt to. but the amount of success you'd have would depend on the quality of writing of the film in question

Ahh but I cant because you chicken out and derail the discussion every time instead of naming a single flick. That alone is a giant L for you, but you do manage to fail in every other counter argument as well so it doesn't stand out too much.

You failed to prove anything but your cheal simping for your autistic overlords. Kinda funny desu. These idiots drive to a Mcdonalds, ask for a sirloin stake, receive a cheap hamburger and then proceed to complain endlessly about how shitty the "steak" is. And this is something you applaud. Yeah, not much braimpower is needed, is it? I just searched if there is an overly dragged out crying fest about Snow White as well and lmao there already is. Good god.

Hard to believe since you listen to them bitching for hours. How many times were you well adjusted in the past week?

Everything everywhere all at once

Fucking seriously?! Kek.

Is the whole stream actually about that video or is it just boring hangout shit

I listen during slow periods at work, you realise that you don't have to finish youtube videos in one sitting, right?

Synthetic Man gave a scathing review of God of War Ragnarok, which the EFAP crew really liked, so there was some drama there