If I want to watch movies, I watch movies

What if the films director wants to be erotic? To titiillize the audience without being a full blown porn movie? Fuck, you zoomere are so soulless

Zoomers just want to relax without weird shit being shoved down our throats everywhere at every chance. Everyone else is insane and Gen Z is waking up

if it is an artistic decision, that is one thing. Eyes wide shut would be very different. throwing in a sex scene when it’s not necessary is bad film making

titiillize

Who the fuck wants to feel
that in a serious movie you fucking Coomer?

I'm gay, simple as.

we know zoomie

No, Gen Z are the weirdos. Being a bunch of prudish crybabies that think sex is weird are the real freaks. Do you people think we reproduce asexully or are you so afraid of popping a boner you rather remove a core part of the human experience just so you aren't "uncomfortable."

Get the fuck over yourselves.

this.

sex scene

it is just a shirtless guy rubbing himself against a woman wearing a bra, at most, you might see a titty or a guy ass

What is the point? where is the hardcore penetration?

When characters go violent on each other, we see the wounds, and the blood, but when comes to sex we only get partial nudity?

Gen z is shaping up to be the worst generation yet

We arent prudish at all. We also dont think sex is weird. Why the fuck do you think the porn industry is bigger than ever? Porn sites should be on a decline by now if what you said is true. We just know where our priorities lie.

I dislike porn. I like mild titillation. It can also be relevant to the plot just like showing kissing, human beings fuck, you don't need to fade to black rather than "actually show it reee".

"You can just watch porn" is like saying "you can just do heroin". And I am addicted to (milder) opiates.

Well, simply put i can see at least 2 reasons for this. First of all this generation has what any other generation would have considered an unfathomable access to porn. They can literally watch sex any time they feel like it on their phones.

Previous generations had to do with getting magazines from dubious sources. The lucky ones would have their own personal TV sets to and were able to either squint their eyes while watching white noise in hopes of catching a boob or watch soft porn on the lost channels.

Having a personal computer wasn´t really a thing until the early 2000´s. Families used to have a single PC so using it for porn was risky as fuck and, virus aside, downloading anything could take days. Kids can now stream a video in real time pretty much anywhere. They never had to struggle for it so it´s no surprise they don´t value it.

The other reason may be related to the content of the sex scenes. Mainstream media sex scenes are super vanilla compared to the random porn video so it´s not surprise those feel boring. Add to that that half of the current actresses are not really worth watching naked (in comparison to your run of the mill porn actress) so i can see why there is no interest in that. Last but not least the increasing amount of gay sexual scenes is not really appealing to straight people (namely the vast majority of people)

i remember when actual sex was seen as this thing in "European cinema".

but head explosions? people getting hacked to death? yeah go nuts, it's FUN violence!

This is what happens when people who grew up on Disney & Nickelodeon finally realize sick perverts are putting sexual innuendos in children's cartoons.

Poor comparison

Actors about to utter a witty repartee

fades away

That should be the extent of humor in movies. There's no greater understanding by continuing it further

what value is added by levity in movies?
you and the other worthless members of your generation clearly dont understand that most blockbuster movies are a mix of things: action, suspense, humor, romance and yes eroticism and secuality
they're a variety show
all of this should be obvious but apparently zoomzooms are so keen to be different from preceding generations that they steep to these levels of retardation
tldr kys

If I want to see sex, I look up porn.

Porn isn't attractive. It's a bunch of mentally ill people having mechanical sex in the most clinical lighting. Also, who wants to imagine fucking someone that does porn, fucking gross.

without weird shit

what have zoomers ever done that wasnt weird
also is sexualityy alien to u

no like any generation before them the look at preceding generations and try to find some way to be different. if you cant find any good cause to surpass our predecessors you got to make shit up
like sex in movies is bad

I dislike gratuitous sex and nudity in moves cause it'd mean I'd be too uncomfortable to watch the film with my parents...

My guess is the same reason zoomers use subtitles. They live with their parents who are either in the room or sleeping

Wrong. Everybody uses subtitles now not just zoomers because all new actors like to mumble their lines for muh realism plus movies nowadays have shit sound mixing.

saying a line during dialogue is the same as and entire scene of just getting naked and fucking

Imagine being this gone

The reason is because zoomers only consoom recent media and for their entire lives sex scenes in movies have been designed in a lab to be as unappealing as possible. They've only seen sex scenes man ass and walled once-weres and mid women that don't take their tops off. That and Euphoria, which has hot topless women in situations that are designed to be morally repugnant. Zoomers can't win.

I don't want to sex at all in any way shape or form. We live in a sick society.

Reminder to the antis, you must remove the black & white movies from your kino lists, as they lack sex scenes.

You pretty much have to have a decent sound system for audio to work in movies. They are mixed for theaters and only have one master with no consideration to home tvs. Also, modern TV speakers are trash and come with weird presets that make 80s and 90s movies do the same thing.

See Basic Instinct, you fucking midwit

You parasocial Gen Z abnormalities are going to be dustbinned by the Millennials before you and Gen Alpha after you. You all are going to get fucked so hard you’ll make Gen X look like fucking Baby Boomers by comparison

name a sex scene that isn't a waste of time and actually adds something to the story
we don't need to see some naked chick riding oppenheimer's dick. It's basically just there for shock value. We don't need to see jodie foster horrifically try to simulate heterosexual sex. We don't need shots of a woman laying next to a man in bed both with perfect hair and makeup with the sheets conveniently covering her breasts and his dick. We don't need to see that jamie lee curtis has STILL GOT IT. Sex scenes are often the worst scenes in a movie, and are almost never actually sexy in any way.

titiillize

instead of titillate

jeet detected. opinion discarded.

another jeet

suggest basic instinct, a midwit if there ever was

calls the other person midwit

wat?

and your complaint is still retarded. it's like complaining about a spook scene in an indiana jones movie

if i want to be spooked i watch a horror movie

goddamn beyond all memeing you're completely retarded

generational nonsense out of nowhere

According to you boomers are the pinnacle, since sex scenes basically didn't exist before them.

So you admit that a girl cracking a joke at a pub is equivalent to her sucking some guys dick in his chair next to you

name a sex scene that isn't a waste of time and actually adds something to the story

the purpose of scenes is not to "add something to story". they often do but sometimes they just add characterization or ambience or entertainment
it's like complaining about a song performance in a movie
ah what the heck you're too dumb to realize how silly your criticism is so you're going to insist on it anyway and make fool of yourselves

If I want an opinion from a braindead zoomer, I'll shoot myself. Simple as.

They can communicate a lot about the characters and situation if done well. For example showing that two people are very closely bonded, giggling, chatting during, visually very comfortable with each other. Or something like tension or awkwardness, showing that someone’s either really good or bad at it. Deep regret or shame. It has to communicate something other than sex. If it’s just a vanilla hookup scene, that’s lazy fanservice

the purpose of scenes is not to "add something to story"

They can communicate a lot about the characters and situation if done well

Alright troll confirmed

you're too dumb to read more than one line of my post
sex scenes are rarely entertaining or add characterization.

sex

weird

Imagine telling on yourself this hard.

an extended funny bit scene in an otherwise serious movie can be just fine so your objection to length is still retarded.
the same way an extended spooky scene in an action-adventure movie is just fine.
most movies are a mix of things and sex is one ingredient.
you're too dumb to have grasped this so far so you had to be told this explicitly

I’m detecting French from the “zoomere”. Either way I’m going to steal titiilize

he's correct though, this is literally storytelling 101
which is why
is a total retard

holy fuck dude this thread

Bad faith. I gave examples

raise a whole generation surrounded my sjws shrieking that anything fun is "problematic"

surprised when thing find something fun "problematic"

Why is anyone shocked at they? They absolutely pussified an entire generation and taught them to feel profound guilt at anything fun or honest. It's not unlike the kind of weird guilt Catholics used to have instilled in them. Very similar dynamic.

The Terminator.

It's not, it was never needed. You have to be oversexed to imagine that it is in any capacity. Absolutely everything can be communicated before and after the act of coitus.

you heard that right

characterization

ambience

entertainment

in the acclaimed western rio bravo dean martin and ricky nelson perform two songs back to back. they dont add anything to story. they've been added for entertainment value
sexuality is -by definition- a pleasant subject for anyone not asexual
you're digging yourself deeper into a hole zoombot
next time you want to position yourself as superior to preceding generations pick a less retarded stance

Gen Z are going to grow up into even bigger fags than millenials aren't they

what movie are you talking about here?

So anything before the 60s must just be dogshit and off the table for you

which is why

(You)

is a total retard

movies are not just about story-telling you absolute brainlet. how can you log into a newsgroup dedicated to tv and film and say such things

In Ecstasy (1933) I would say sex and the sex scenes are a pretty significant part of the story.

the actual sex scene is gratuitous and inline with Jimbo's business acumen after working in Roger corman b-movies. 2 main ingredients were sex and violence. He got them both covered for the teenagers and YAs who went to watch the movie. So no, the actual sex scene in terminator is not necessary. He could've just kept the camera strictly above the tits but he knew tits would tick a profit box

Boomers liked sex scenes on their tapes or whatever so they could goon to it
Now we're weird for saying we don't need it anymore?

old porn

I think you've settled that

i said it's an ingredient. has your adhd-riddled brain lost all reading comprehension?

Absolutely everything can be communicated before and after the act of coitus.

movies or movie scenes are NOT just about plot or communicating something. sometimes scenes are about stirring up certain feelings only.
i dont give a shit if you like this particular ingredient or not i just want to make fun of you for positing it should never be part of a recipe or that only ingredients with nutritional value should be part of a dish, ever

tfw there are sex scenes in the oldest literature written over 4000 years ago

Sex is literally a fundamental aspect of the human condition. Making art without sex is barely even art.

You feel awkward about sex scenes in movies because you live with your parents and have to share the TV with them.

not at all. as an x-er i was raised on those movies. they have other ingredients i like. sometimes even better

All the emotions ARE stirred up beforehand. When they're raw dogging it's just softcore porn at that point.
Look at Lost in Translation, should that have had a sex scene?

Gen Z grew up with porn so they think all sex is porn. Novel mentions the protagonist sleeps with his love interest? Jerk-off material.

*whereas with porn, you watch that on your phone, hiding under your blanket in your room

Zoomer males don’t fuck. They can’t relate to it. But they crave it. Movies are their escapism and sex scenes ruin it for them. No great mystery here.

Because zoomers are on one hand, akward virgins or at least infrequent sex havers while also have been exposed to throatfucking and anal prolapse porn since childhood. They're confused

zoomers don't even watch movies
if you see 10 movies/year as a zoomie you're basically a movie buff

Honestly? This is the opposite of plonked (keyed)

arousal is also an emotion that you may want to linger on in your movie. just like any other emotion from amusement to horror

they turn the movie off every 5 minutes regardless of what scene is playing, got to catch those Pokémon creatures!

That's the one I'm talking about. Have you seen Lost in Translation

no no no. upcoming generation always look at preceding generations for flaws. and when you dont find enough you just make some up

Because most sex scenes nowadays are fucking disgusting, with ugly actresses and negroes and fags. It's that simple.

21st century movie

hell no

you have an absolutely insane concept of what narrative based media actually is and what constituent parts within it are "the story" and what parts are apparently somehow outside of that "story" while still being a part of it

characterization is among the story-telling devices, "ambiance" and "entertainment" are both completely subjective and totally unrelated elements incidental to literally the entire story/movie/book/etc. i mean what do you think "characterization" is for? it's the development of characters, who are agents within a story, that are there to progress the story - it's literally all in service to "the story"

i mean holy shit i don't even know where to start with you. serious question, are you drunk?

Current year everything is so gay so it's not like we're missing out.

It's not a gen z phenomenon.
I'm millennial and I always felt the same way.
Nowadays I also skip over the scenes where there's a lull in the action and characters talk about their feefees.
It's not that I can't appreciate complex character motivations and deeper emotions, but the writers nowadays are so shit with their annoying, unrealized, unrealistic, unrelatable characters it's not worth the empathic investment.
The Witcher 3 shits all over most of it.
I'm also able to enjoy immensely Star Trek TNG where characters pretty much just talk for an hour, but it's competent characters working towards a goal.

you have an absolutely insane concept of what narrative based media actually is

you're constantly overplaying the value of story or narrative. a scene does not have to add something to the plot. an episode in a tv show doesnt have to the metaplot. it can be a standalone episode like dd born again episode 5.

"ambiance" and "entertainment" are both completely subjective and totally unrelated elements incidental to literally the entire story/movie/book/etc.

good. you can have a 100 minute movie and easily get away with 5, 10 or 15 minutes devoted to scenes that dont progress plot if the content of the scene on its own is entertaining

i mean holy shit i don't even know where to start with you. serious question, are you drunk?

no you're just not very intelligent and dont understand the medium of film. im sorry anon

Don't Look Now
Lost Highway

your generation has yet to show that it understands what good movies are composed of

because modern "sex scenes" are actually humiliation rituals for men. Romanticism is sexist.

name a sex scene that isn't a waste of time and actually adds something to the story

this is a false dichotomy and therefore a loaded demand. nobody has to show any such thing. all that needs to demonstrated is that many viewers find the (tasteful?) depiction of sexuality entertaining. this is easy to demonstrate

i'm seeing i simply cannot explain this to you so i won't bother

all i'll tell you is that it's an accepted rule across all forms of writing that a scene that doesn't service the story in some way is useless, a sign of bad writing, and is most often the fat you trim away in later iterations as you hit the endpoint of a complete work

literally anybody with any extended experience and acumen, professional creds, actual education, will tell you this

it's not "story or narrative" by the way, but i'll leave you to figure out the actual distinction. that was the biggest red flag that you don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about here. the actual content and implication behind that first sentence is just as telling but your total lack of basic vocab for this shit speaks volumes

Kys coomer.

you can trim away the 2 songs from rio bravo easily and it impacts the story in no way

the good thing about asexuals is they have low reproduction rates

Good movie: Jurassic Park
Good series: Star Trek TNG
Good miniseries: Merlin (1998)
Your turn zoomer.

Because they're lonely and seeing couples together on film reminds them of their loneliness.

lol no. your generation has to show it by producing it. you only grasp it via creation

Sex indicates a bad movie, a mere correlation. There are great exceptions, the sex scene itself is not a problem. But usually when there are sex scenes they are not even hot, they are almost all teasing, they feel fake. Now with AI we'll get more good sex + good movie combo and this retarded shit will go away maybe.

producing

You mean creating.
Ain't no one producing shit nowadays the economy the way it is and the movie market dried up the way it is with all the niche talents like lighting dead.
But I think D&D:Honor Among Thieves was a fun romp.

the last time we had this thread people had webms of pre code movies where they made it very clear what was about to happen without the need to actually show it. bring that back I say

boomers didn't "goon", retard

you just noticed?

Boomers are clearly porn addicts since they get upset zoomers don't want porn in movies

But I think D&D:Honor Among Thieves was a fun romp.

it was an awful american bastardization of the medieval europe of legends. forgotten realms is just bad

The generation that all live with their parents are afraid of sex scenes

I mean, it makes sense

based zoomers will save cinema

Went to peep shows to goon in public

we need more a batman movie with a femboy Robin and full penetration. Crime. Penetration. Crime. Full penetration. Crime. Penetration. And this goes on and on and back and forth for 90 or so minutes until the movie just sort of ends.

good for the plot development

surely you're trolling

masturbating isn't gooning, retard. christ, you guys invented the word and you don't even know the definition.

Eroticism, sexual interest, attraction, showing two characters have connected.

What is lost by having a sex scene in a movie?

Why does the zoomie generation feel so awkward about something that is integral to the human experience? Why can't your generation think of two people being naked, enjoying each other, without framing it as exploitation, irrelevant to the plot, or uncomfortable?

It ends with Batman busting a fat one inside Robin

I just watch kdrama now so I don't have to deal with it. It's like a joke everytime I try to watch a western show I start a counter to see how long it will take for the inevitable sex scene to happen.

That's a zoomer meme from tik tok
Pop cultures memes haven't been invented here for years

You WILL watch the sex, chuddo!