HE DON LIKE AI

i like playing on midjourney for fun, but it is curious how many tranny are on the platform

I can't draw for shit, but pretending AI slob is anything of value is cope.

miyazaki talks shit about japs for 2 hours

''haha japs btfo''

miyazaki talks shit about america for 30 seconds

''AAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH''

*makes 100000 anti-anime guy threads''

Most art made by humans is of no value either, I'm not making an argument for ai more that content does not necessarily have any value. Ai isn't going to change much because very little of the work produced today by humans is consumed by anyone already

uhhh mutts sisters…? i don't feel so good

I'm glad AI is raping everything you love, and I hope it costs you your job.

should we be angry at billionaires and corporations that make our life shit

naaaaaah, lets shit on artists

Chuds really are soulless subhumans.

Uh...holy based

There are about four or five living artists creating art, aka The New, and AI is not going to be replacing them, although if they're smart they will incorporate it into their works.

almost completely the opposite
it literally just makes you look even more despicable so far

animation

industry that famously uses workhouses

close to slave labour

just so we can laff at some funny cartoons

Yeah, how dare people start using computer software.

I hope it costs you your job.

We live in a society where this is an attack.

The jew cries out as the chud sucks his dick.

chuds love billionaires and corporations, they look to them to save them because they have no ability to save themselves.

bro imagine if AI took over all the boring work so we can focus on art and creativity

art is the first thing to get replaced

Very sad, but such is our faustian bargain with technology.

it's a minority but the successful artists are famously the most overpaid individuals in existence.

The Beatles wrote a song genuinely complaining that they paid 95% in income tax. i would genuinely murder for 1/20th of what The Beatles were "earning" at that point.

of course you're into art because you love art, right anon? :)))

Want public sympathy, empathy and support in your time of need

Double down on being a cunt

Well they did go to art school

of course you're into art because you love art, right anon? :)))

Yes, I make no money from it, it's a hobby, it's self-expression. Things that chuds lack because you're soulless subhumans, as I said.

chuds are communists now

The tech companies developing AI pay 0% income tax, and receive billions in government funding.

the stupid thing, its not either-or. there are meals where i appreciate the creativity and ability of the chefs. there are meals where i don't care that it was mass-produced in a factory (in fact i'm glad for the sterile precision and money saved).

it's the weirdos who act like human art is inherently better that are inventing this problem, for themselves.

we lost the battle. I am personally just hopeless at this point. both the left and the right have completely surrendered to the corporate overlords

Hello, I am Hayao Miyazaki, the creator of worlds and stories where dreams and nature come together.

As for people using AI to create images in the style of Studio Ghibli, I find it a curious and perhaps bittersweet phenomenon. While I understand that technology is a tool that can be used to express creativity, I also believe that the soul of animation lies in the hands of artists—those who pour their heart, their years of training, and their experiences into their craft. The human touch, the imperfections, and the warmth of an artist’s hand cannot be replicated by machines. AI may mimic the style, but it cannot capture the essence of the world we try to build. True art comes from deep within, from personal stories and emotions. In the end, it is the artist’s spirit that gives life to their work.

it's the weirdos who act like human art is inherently better

It is, simply because AI "art" is not art at all.

good for you, in all sincerity.

i remember an internet where the only issue was CREDITING artists. a few PayPal donate buttons, maybe ads, but nobody would dream of 'getting paid' because 'it's work'. if anything YOU had to pay, for web hosting or some shit. most no-name bands would love exposure, of course they would. it's up to them to find a hotel to stay at and what to eat.

as long as the end result is open source, this is fine. but that's a wider problem with software (and outdated copyright/IP laws) in general.

we had this debate with "digital 'art'". you lost.

Art is the ultimate expression of humanity, anyone who disagrees with this is an NPC. You would eat grey nutritious slop if it was served to you because you are no better than a pig. Your mindset is what leads to soulless glass boxes that are supposed to pass for cities.

A lot of amazing artists existed because they could make a living off it in the past. Many such commercial artists careers were phased out thanks to technology like photography. How many more Leyendeckers could there have been if such art remained a viable career choice?
As long as art involves expression, craftsmanship, and application of art fundamentals then it counts. AI image generation rarely if ever does those three.

being well known in the us was unironically a mistake for ghibli
it should have been like moomin that americans barely know

i fully support the development of grey nutritious slop. i hope food is a 'solved problem' like energy production. you are almost guaranteed old-timey food as a gimmick even if all food comes in pill form. same way people knit and make woodprints in current year.

i care about the end result. i genuinely do not care who (or what) made it. caring about artists, as people, is strange. unless they're your friends.

Digital art involves actually drawing. AI "art" is writing a prompt or setting a pre-existing pic into a filter.

Genuine question, why does anyone think I should care what an artist thinks?
Have they never heard of death of the author?

noooo if you like his art style you have to do what he says

Why?

Chuds don't believe in humanity. They just like to "win". If they're losing they will switch sides to make it look like they are "winnning". If there was a meteor coming to wipe out all life, chuds would side with the meteor because some guy on twitter (which is the chud's main platform) said they don't like the idea of a meteor wiping out all life.

Genuine question, why should I care what you think?

I'm not demanding you do?

actually your Wacom tablet is sending signals over USB, and Photoshop is using algorithms to simulate brush strokes to decide where to place pixels.

if the argument is it involves other's work (an argument that is slowly dying): did you code Photoshop? did you create those brushes? EVERY digital artist downloads assets, uses reference material, etc.

Yes you do, constantly.
You made that post to create a consensus with your asinine opinion which holds no value.

death of the author is more about intent/meaning, their stupid anti-AI argument is art itself will cease to exist without artists. as if they are quite literally dead.

in any other career this is a positive. technological progress. artistes are just inherently special.

Artists usually pay for those materials. Especially if they do commercial work. If a studio got caught using pirated photoshop they'd get their asses reamed in court.

don't try to change his mind with logic this is a chud baiting you and he's sinked his hook onto you

Nigger, if you don't really see the difference between "hurr durr you didn't akchually create the pencil you're using" and uploading someone else's pic into an AI-generator to make it like an anime you're an idiot.

not all technological progress is good

Cause most careers people don't like doing, but with art people who do it actually enjoy the process of drawing and shit.

but with art people who do it actually enjoy the process of drawing and shit

AI isn't a threat to that though. It's only a threat to making money off of it.
It's actually freeing since it means they can now create art just for art's sake, instead of having to draw their 100000th furry commission.

You are actually retarded lmao

pay some guy money to draw me something I describe to him

he gives me the drawing

I go around claiming it's my drawing

If a studio got caught using pirated photoshop they'd get their asses reamed in court.

How would anyone ever know?

One could argue that drawing shitty commissions is still preferable to getting a real job because it allows the artist to practice and it doesn't kill your soul like a real job (which would probably be a shitty one if you don't have a suitable education)

The way the legal system is set up in burgerland is that snitches get huge cuts. Like, if its a big company that's pirating something like Windows you get a 6 digit cut once the courts are through with it.

In first world countries they have inspections.

I really don't get why chuds think artists making money from their art is a great sin. These are the same people who donate to live streaming grifters for reheated political takes from twitter but don't think it's fair that people who actually try to produce something creative should be able to make a living from it.

OI YOU GOT YER FOTOSHOP LOICENSE????

And bongs get made fun of.

It's for businesses, bro. Nobody is going to go to your home to check on your photoshop license.

They think all artists are leftist trannies high off their own farts who hypocritically attacked other job sectors losing workers due to automation and telling them to learn2code or something.

You will get extradited and sent to Guantanamo Bay. Don't mess with software loicenses it's not you who's paying anyway.

AI is pajeetslop.
Imagine unironically creaming yourself over lines of code written by fecal elementals, poo golems and living diarrhea, just to apply a japanese cartoon filter on images.

Because chuds are uncreative and talentless. Or at least the vast 99,99% majority of them. They have no concept for beauty.
And these AI generators are easy to use and to make political memes and propaganda (of course, not at all original, but just the same shit but now in Ghibli style lmao), the peak of their expression.

i like architecture. i don't give a FUCK about the photographer or what fancy lenses/composition they used. documenting the autistic pixels for my eyes to absorb is the point, and it's the cool buildings/engineering i appreciate.

people say games are art now. they're engineered toys. which is still impressive.

are you 13

the warmth of an artist’s hand cannot be replicated by machines

why?

True art comes from deep within, from personal stories and emotions

you are just a biomechanical robot

you are just a biomechanical robot

edgy, and blatantly wrong.

bro, we're just machines, bro

Damn, bro, I remember being 15 and watching The Matrix, too.

You can empathize with an artist. Can you empathize with a machine?

True art requires narcissism is what they mean

expression, craftsmanship

AI can do that

and application of art fundamentals

which are (other than LE HECKN SOVL)?

I cried during the scene in A.I. where they throw defective robots into a giant fan

I'm just a bot. Your answers were invalid, please try again

Wasn't there a study that found that leftists are more likely to emphasize with inanimate objects like rocks and trees than with close family members and other human beings?

I'm sure there's a totally legit Anon Babble infographic about that.

no, 34. again i just remember when the internet was acting like drawing vs 'drawing in Photoshop' was like art vs some computerised facsimile of art. DeviantArt even makes the distinction to this day.

nowadays nobody cares if a comic book used the Paint Bucket tool instead of a professional colourist. or a typeface instead of a letterer. it saves time. it even does a better job. yeah the human 'mistakes' might add character, but so what.

i don't care if these new tools use someone else's art any more than i care if you create a poster, and the sky was actually a stock element rather than clouds you painted. how 'down to brass tacks' does it have to go before it's art? the JPEG itself is still art, doesn't matter who's behind it. i could write a program to spit out random MIDI files and end up with a beautiful piece of music.

expression

limited, it's like when someone wants to express themselves and they decide to commission an artist instead of doing it themselves, making it not first hand.

craftsmanship

prompting is not craftsmanship

fundamentals

pick up any educational artbook, artists don't learn like AIjeets imply (that every artist copies and gets inspiration from other art), they learn the fundamentals of things like color theory, anatomy, life drawing, composition, perspective, etc.

How does this justify spamming the board with AI images saved from twitter exactly?

someone wants to express themselves and they decide to commission an artist

So movies are not art, since an Auteur never manages to create the movie in his head due to all the other pepo involved.

other two posts: "LE HEKN original SOVL but we just copy our forefathers and their taste."

It's a collaborative art, idiot. All the people involved in it are people, as you might notice.

i don't care how people make OC. i liked Anon Babbletards drawing stick figures in MS Paint.

i actually miss that deep-dream early AI stuff, with all the spooky eyes. where did that go? shit's literally disappeared from the internet.

a lot of the boards have slop 'containment' threads just because people get neurotic about it. if you want to go see some drawings, try i'm just happy with OC. some of these images make me laugh. literally no other way they would have been created (or certainly, some anon wasn't going to put the effort into photoshopping them).

I like good art, I love modern art...

but fuck my live most "art" from self proclaimed reddit artists is just pure copyslop trash. With zero expression

Totally replaceable.

I would say that the art "purity" of a writer or a painter is higher than a movie director, yes. But producing a movie professionally takes significantly more effort than prompting an AI. Ive yet to see a single non-shit AI movie.

OC

Did you miss the "saved from twitter" part?

All AI "art" is slop. Nobody saves it nor cares about it other than the one who ordered its creation.

well that depends on the image itself. i don't care if it comes from another message board.

i do care if it's a screenshot OF twitter or i'm expected to know something like it's some streamer, as if that's common knowledge. just post the image itself. and then yeah if it's from Twitter, who gives a shit. traditional artists use Twitter to host their files. it's a forum.

collaborative art

producing takes significantly more effort

oh yes

I still don't get why we all have to put up with it just because YOU like it.

if the board catered to my tastes, the quality of discussion would increase slightly.

he doesn't like AI

do you think some part of her was aware that after all the DIRECT abuse, even at the end of her life, voyeurs would continuously get off to her? in fact, it would escalate with the rise of the internet?