Will we ever get biblically accurate Jesus on the silver screen?

I'm a believer and I believe Jesus looks as traditionally depicted but those 'eyewitness' accounts are bullshit. The Turin Shroud is the best evidence for Jesus appearance

No, his tongue was shaped like a sword. Its his eyes that are made of fire.

Daniels

Can't even spell a book of the Bible correctly. Disregarded.

I'm a believer

You're not

Biblically accurate Jesus can look practically however people want him to look. There are essentially zero detailed physical descriptions of his appearance anywhere in the entire thing. Just metaphors and a couple parts that might be describing parts of his appearance or might just as easily mean something else.

We literally know exactly what he looks like. We have the shroud he was buried with and he left an afterimage on it.

Shocked isn’t a color, Dumas

There are essentially zero detailed physical descriptions of his appearance anywhere in the entire thing

So you haven't read it.

Jesus existed like Spider-Man did.

We literally got several.

Jesus was white, heterosexual, Christian, trad, and conservative. End of story.

Impressed isn't a color either, retard.

firsthand eyewitness

Christianity never even existed

the cope of copes

So, are ancient jews white?

While absolute, irrefutable proof of Jesus of Nazareth's existence like a photograph or DNA sample doesn't exist, historians and scholars generally agree that he was a real person, based on the available evidence.
Here's a breakdown of the evidence:
1. Early Christian Writings:
Paul's Letters: Written within a few decades of Jesus's death (circa 50-60 AD), they are the earliest surviving Christian texts referencing Jesus, portraying him as a real person, a Jew, and outlining core aspects of his life, teachings, crucifixion, and resurrection.
The Gospels: The four Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) are the primary sources for Jesus's life and teachings, written roughly 40-70 years after his death. While they are religious texts with theological interpretations, they contain historical information about Jesus within the context of first-century Palestine.
2. Non-Christian Sources:
Flavius Josephus: A Jewish historian writing around 93 AD, mentions Jesus in his Antiquities of the Jews, once referencing "James, the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ".
Tacitus: A Roman historian, writing around 116 AD, mentions "Christus" (the Christian title for Jesus) being executed by Pontius Pilate during the reign of Tiberius.
Pliny the Younger: A Roman governor, writing around 112 AD, mentions early Christians worshipping "Christ as a god," providing evidence for the existence of a Christian movement stemming from Jesus.
3. Historical Context:
Absence of Denial: Importantly, no ancient source, Jewish or Pagan, explicitly denies Jesus's existence. Critics and opponents of Christianity focused on challenging Jesus's divinity and teachings, not his existence, according to History.com.

chuds would be insanely triggered if they ever read the bible

Jesus was AI ?

I have. I even understood most of it, too. That’s how I know that Jesus’s appearance is never explicitly detailed in a literal way anywhere (no that stuff in revelations doesn’t count as a literal description) and even if it did it wouldn’t matter.

(Cont.)
Important Considerations:
Historical vs. Theological: It's essential to distinguish between the historical Jesus (the man who lived) and the Christ of faith (the divine figure believed in by Christians). Historical methods can only address the former, not the latter, according to Wikipedia.
Limited Sources: Our historical knowledge of many figures from the first century is limited, especially concerning those of lower socio-economic status, making it unlikely that abundant non-Christian sources would have focused on Jesus specifically.
The combination of early Christian and independent non-Christian sources, along with the historical context, provides compelling evidence for the existence of Jesus of Nazareth as a historical figure.

Now, you may present your evidence that you are not a transgender, socialist operative of chaos and terrorism. We'll wait. Or, if you prefer, one of Trump's secret task force teams will come to visit you soon.

even atheist historians agree the man existed

I'm rather worried by people using chatgpt to make arguments for them

supernatural vision

real

I wasn't a believer, but then I saw her face

Eunuchs don't have sex. Neither do Buddhist monks, and they think you're degens too, if you're pulling that card

Why? We've been looking things up on our phones for decades.

The Turin Shroud is the best evidence for Jesus appearance

anyone got a qrd on this?

Is it even possible for liberals to make a meme without writing a short story out of it?

It's in the Vatican under heavy guard. We'll need to make a heist plan.

In 1988, three separate laboratories (Oxford, Zurich, and Arizona) used radio-carbon dating to determine its age. All dated the shroud to a date of 1260–1390 CE.

There isnt a physical description of Moses or Isaiah or Jeremiah, if the narrative paused for a physical description that would be out of place and inconsistent.

Jesus told you to accept transpeople.

Did the Eunuchs in the bible want to read stories to children REAL BAD?
Did they break a lot of world records in womens' sports too?

No he didnt and the love your enemies is intentionally mistranslated from "have mercy" so I can have mercy on you without "accepting" you for who you are. Jesus condones Elijah, he did not bring up Elijah and tell him to chill out, Elijah slaughtered the tranny god worshippers.

It's a fraud and anyone who's done any kind of work with textures for 3d models can immediately tell you why.

There are no records of Pontius Pilate describing Jesus' physical appearance. I assume all those other sources are just lies as well

look at all the cope! why do you even larp as a christian if you are so triggered by christ's teachings? if you want to be all about hate and violence, just larp as a muslim

Its genuinely bizarre that europeans adopted a sandnigger religion and then demanded their deity look like them instead

People without balls = trans

alright

The problem with denying Jesus' existence is that this will just make practically every historical figure pre-1900's existence dubious. Who's to say that Shakespeare wasn't just a nickname for writers back in the day we don't have photos of him. What about Julius Ceasar, what if he's just a myth since we don't have pictures of him. What if all those ancient documents are fake, everyone involved in them are dead.

In 2024 more extensive testing was done using wide angle x-ray scattering to try and date it based on the natural aging of flax cellulose in the fibers. It was determined to match other samples of linen from the first century. Given this new information, it’s speculated that the carbon dating done previously matching it to the Middle Ages may have been a result of repairs or alterations done to it around that time.

Looks directly into the camera

I agree. I don’t get your point though. I wasn’t saying I think there should be a detailed description of him in the Bible, I was just saying that there isn’t one.

Jesus was a black man
Jesus was Batman

Why would he not have looked like everyone else born in that area at the time?

Ni

first-hand

lmao

NOOOO ALL THE THINGS JESUS SAID ABOUT LOVE AND FORGIVENESS ARE FAKE! HE WAS ACKCHUALLY A HATEFUL CHUD!!

and there are those who choose to live like eunuch for the sake of the kingdom of heaven.

the troons we have do it because of a mental illness and a society that value money over the lives and dignity of people, i do not hate troons nearly as much as the people that use them as a way to gain easy money, influence, or just because they want attention, these are the real evildoers, troons are victims, and while they may be retarded, annoying and disgusting, they clearly have a mental illness, and you can't really blame them as much as their "allies", who exploit them for personal gains under the false pretext that they're helping them, they are not helping them at all, what troons want is not the same as what they need, but what they want is profitable for economy, when what they need isn't.
also, in a comunist world, troons wouln't exist, because troons are a symptom of high-end capitalism.

I'm sure there are older movies that already depict jesus like this.

This is what Jesus most likely looked like compared to other people.

This is the actually reasonable view of transgenderism I wish I saw more of on the internet. Thanks for reminding me that not everyone here is actually retarded.

Matthew 19:12 ESV

>For there are eunuchs who have been so from birth, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by men, and there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. Let the one who is able to receive this receive it.”

This is talking about celibacy. Actual castration is a sin in the Mosaic Law.

Deuteronomy 23:1“No man who has been castrated by having his testicles crushed or who has had his male organ cut off may come into the congregation of Jehovah.

Deut 25:11,12-11“If two men get into a fight with each other and the wife of the one intervenes to protect her husband from the one striking him and she reaches out her hand and grabs hold of him by his private parts,12you must amputate her hand. You*should not feel sorry.

gamaliel

Literally the most jewish person in the history of history

also, in a comunist world, troons wouln't exist, because troons are a symptom of high-end capitalism.

I'm surprised that this is only the 2nd time I've ever heard this point articulated.

Wtf is doing Shakespeare there?

This is talking about celibacy

If it was about celibacy, Jesus would have used a term associated with celibacy rather than with castration, e.g. Essene

I don't deny Jesus is talking about Eunuchs. What I DO deny is that Jesus is promoting castration. He wouldn't do that because he was under the Mosaic Law himself and wouldn't violate it.

Deuteronomy 23:1“No man who has been castrated by having his testicles crushed or who has had his male organ cut off may come into the congregation of Jehovah.

Deut 25:11,12-11“If two men get into a fight with each other and the wife of the one intervenes to protect her husband from the one striking him and she reaches out her hand and grabs hold of him by his private parts,12you must amputate her hand. You*should not feel sorry.

He was just using the example of Eunuchs for people that wouldn't marry and be distracted from being ministers of God.

Shakespeare is a historical figure. The picture is depicting Jesus as much as a legitimate historical figure as all those other people in it.

Contrary to what that dipshit Einstein thought, time travel is possible if all all time exists simultaneously. It becomes just a matter of traveling through a portal to an identical, but temporarily offset dimension.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Growing_block_universe

I'm not that Anon, but you're welcome.

There's no proof that Shakespeare actually existed

Depends on what "proof" means to you.

That has nothing to do with its historical reliability. That just means the copies we have are reliable transcripts of the original text.

only jews genuinely deny christ's existence

jesus was talking about transexuals and not slave eunuchs

lol at this troon cope

God is black

Chudbros... I don't feel so good

some who are born that way

some who chose to be that way

sure, slave eunuchs

I'm starting to think maybe this dude was just sort of made up.

retard

If he was fake there wouldn't be so much history about him.

Why are Europeans obsessed with Jewish war propaganda? Paul only opened up to non-ethnic Jews, because he and the other Jews themselves were culturally Hellenized.

some who are born that way

yes still today there are some people that are born with body disfigurements and anomalies

some who chose to be that way

some were cutting their genitals in order to not have temptations, if in order to not be a faggot or a degenerate you have to cut your genitals then you should do it, but if you cut your genitals to ascend in degeneracy they you should probably 41 yourself.