Huh hello, based department?
Huh hello, based department?
defensive
Didn't the Arab conquests happen like 400 years before the first crusade?
It did, the crusades were a reaction to the Ottoman victory at Manzikert. But don't expect clapistanis to know that.
It can be seen as defensive even if it's a preemptive strike.
The Holy Lands are Christian, not arab or jewish.
This sounds anti-Semitic, DOGE may want to have a word with you.
The trouble is the Arabs didn't stop. They took Iberia and never stopped pushing into Europe.
Fucking Muslims are always trying to take what isn't theirs, especially from Christians. That's why you've got to beat them into submission. Catholics used to know that, hopefully we'll relearn it soon enough.
Arab conquests
Doesn't she mean the Muslim conquests?
She's right, it was commonly understood before meddling interlopers
templarpilled
Is that one of the right wing grifter accounts exposed as being a jeet?
I don't give a fuck about an actor's opinion on anything but acting.
Why do you?
I don't know why it's so funny trying to imagine a scenario where this topic would come up with actress Sydney Sweeney, she would give this opinion on it, and then it would make ti to the news.
She's more than just a pair of tits you know
Imagine being a French noble embarking from your hillside estate in wine country to be told THIS is the Holy Land lmao
Pajeets are such annoying faggots, it's almost unbelievable. Like at one point in time you would be considered insane for saying a particular race basically ruined the internet as a whole, but they somehow managed it.
Thread theme
youtube.com
I actually care when they pledge to take back Constantinople from the Mahometan heathens
I care when they align with my views
I see
Yes, she's an actress.
It's difficult to even feel a human connection to them. It's like an alien lifeform almost.
I saw on the news pajeets flooded a cherry blossom festival and started shaking the blossoms off the trees, breaking branches off to carry around with them, and even climbing the trees and causing damage. The story only got out because of social media amplified it but the pictures used in the newspapers didn't show them.
KEK she never said that
Actors are always giving their opinion on Gaza, Palestine, and Israel, it seems like an easy jumping off point.
I think if you and everyone you knew spent your whole lives hearing about an exotic, distant far away land yet none of you had ever visited it then you'd probably want it to look really different from your normal home. That would make it seem more exotic, magical, and special.
they waged wars before the crusades. It was just a new way to convince dirt poor people to massacre each other for their master's benefit
DEUS VULT
Imagine having the internet and being like fuck yeah this is my home I don't want to live anywhere else.
she's right you know
Godless heathen! Go back to your Bella Ramsey & capeshit threads.
I love Sydney Sweeney now, she's always been one of us: proud white American! We won!
Sweeney is unironically an expert on vintage cars
I love Sydney Sweeney now, she's always been one of us: proud white American! We won!
Of course. She's from an agricultural county in Eastern Washington. She's cow poke.
Eastern Washington
That actually makes a pretty big difference, I didn't know what part of the state that was.
God's views heathen!
Monjoie!
It might as well be Idaho
Sydney is more of a man than you'll ever be.
It's why most of them went back home after they took Jerusalem
Be honest. How many of you in this thread actually believed the OP?
yea but it was all Arab at that point. woman moment.
They are disgusting, they will take they can get their hands on, if you go down to a food bank it's jeets everywhere taking everything. I used to work for a taxi company and they would ask for free stuff fucking constantly and they will bitch and moan about any tiny expense, they're like Jews but far less intelligent and far more smelly, they are a contemptible people
Did she really choke slam the iron sheik? No
Is it really still real regardless? Yes
You are a massive retard and have no idea what you're talking about.
deus vultron
The first one at least was in defense of the christian Eastern Roman Empire and was supposed to mainly focus on the recovery of recently lost Anatolia. Emperor Alexios expected a small amount of "franks" that he could command, instead of the two waves of crusading forces; one of peasants, which was unruly and he quickly dispatched to the other side of the Bosporus so that it was the Turks problem - and a second one made of fanatical god-fearing professional knights and men-at-arms who were more interested in the recovery of the Holy Land (lost to muslims hundreds of years earlier) so that their every sin could be forgiven (just as the Pope promised to every guy who embarked into the Crusade; a way more convincing marketing than "let's go help the greek emperor recover land") than in protecting the frontiers of Christianity from further Islamic encroachment. It also didn't help that half of the commanding nobles where not interested in either helping the Byzantines or recovering Jerusalem but in carving out princedoms for themselves.
She's right if she's referring to the first crusade. The Muslims were hammering down on the Christian Byzantine Empire, had conquered Spain, and by conquering the Byzantines they would be able to launch further invasions into Europe from the east. Wealth and glory played a part, but it was absolutely a justified response to centuries of continous muslim aggression.
defensive
war
No such thing, you fucking jew.
not all of it is a miserable shithole and it probably looked a lot different back then. they really fucked the place up with irresponsible farming practices + chopping down all the trees
Crusaders murdered the orthodox clergy in the cities they captured
To add to this, neither of the two main parties involved actually expected to recover the Levant; Urban was using the crusade as a tool of rapprochement in hopes of fixing the schism and Alexios just wanted to fend off the turks (and actually would have preferred an alliance with the fatimids, the muslims holding Jerusalem at the time, against the seljuks). The crusade just gained a massive momentum of its own and ended up being incredibly lucky beyond all expectations.
ALL crusades were / are justified
The next one included
I walked by a food bank (might have been a soup kitchen handing out packaged meals) and a guy was arguing with a middle-aged pajeet that he'd "already taken 3 bags." I saw the guy getting into a decent car with a bag, not sure if he got it at that place, when I came out of a store down the street 10 minutes or so later. Pissed me off beyond anything. There was some other food bank that got in shit for saying they would no longer give food to noncitizens because all the pajeet international students were treating it like a free grocery store.
Depends on the crusade. First one was defensive, 2nd one was a farce, 3rd one was counter-offensive, 4th one was a complete farce. Catar crusade and Teutonic crusade were entirely offensive maneuvers.
They have zero shame, they don't want to spend a cent on anything and are constantly trying to get free stuff
How does that work? In my country everyone gets exactly one bag per day and thats it.
They'll just go in and take it, if you tell them no then they'll start with the "please brother, do me this one favour brother" I had to deal with the cunts asking for "favours" constantly
They won't outright steal like niggers do but they have no problem begging and pestering someone for an hour to get a free loaf of bread