I'm just asking questions

I'm just asking questions...

*makes a series of absurd claims with no evidence*

Big Archeology won't like this but...

*makes further absurd claims*

during the Younger Dry ass period....

*makes more absurd claims*

but really I'm just asking questions :^)

1043480_v9_aa.jpg - 1072x1373, 373.38K

makes absurd claims with no evidence

he's literally not any different from any other archeologist in history

There's something missing...

what's missing, Graham?

.... something

Wowww

2033.jpg - 200x200, 15.24K

The dibbate is over

archeologists should tell better stories if they don't want to get outshown by netflix schizos

ngl the Younger Juicy ass period was lit

all history is absurd claims but the way (()) lost their shit at him is telling

He's so filthy he needs to be hosed down and de-liced.

Deboonked by Dr. Dibble

Why does he look like the missing link? Literal monkey caveman creature.

You know I had to do it to em

JtYjNnXG.jpg - 1280x720, 158.39K

Hopefully Dribble ends up like Karl Jobst for trying to tear down an honest crank like Hancock.

its remarkable how interesting and mysterious you can make history

when you purposely omit known facts

this is the blueprint for murder crime stories for women and ancient history conspiracy for men

known facts

lol, this dude think Archaeology is hard science

he's just asking the right questions

What a silly thing to say anon

Cant be debunked

ftfy

has been saying the same shit since his 1992 book fingerprints of the gods, which he wrote will smoking copious amounts of weed, and still hasn't found any compelling evidence for what he's selling.

Curious

Yeah that's nice how about you excavate the Sahara

you haven't checked under every grain of sand in the Sahara? Heh... guess you can't prove me wrong

hq720 (1).jpg - 686x386, 52.15K

You realise the reason they're against him is because of the out of Africa theory right?

I'm pretty sure they're against him because outside of Gobekli Tepe and a couple other similar sites he doesn't have any real evidence of an ancient civilization. I have listen to most of his podcasts on JRE and the Randall Carlson ones so I actually think there's a lot of evidence for the Younger Dryas impact but the rest is a mad reach. I mean the Plato stuff is basically "I know a guy who knows a guy who went to Atlantis" lmao

Is that Jim Carey?

Why are you so upset by simple questions?

Graham almost threw a wobbly when Flint kept pwning him on JRE kek

He saw some suspicious looking rocks underwater while on vacation

Hard to do when the whole archaeological community tries to block you from everything

Flint gaped him

Plato

or

the entire field of modern archeology

For me, it's Plato.

Could the ancient egyptians have recieved guidance by an ancient martian civilization? I'm just asking questions.

gets bodied by dibble on Joe Rogan

makes a 3 hour video in reply to arguing back every single point

doesnt allow Dibble to respond

goes back on Joe Rogan laughing about how he proved Dibble wrong on everything and completely still stonewalling him

based

Rogan was fully playing into his delusion too. I mean the biggest one or one he seemed to lead with was about the number of shipwrecks that have been surveyed as a 3 million estimate which was actually ONLY 250,000 lmfao great refutation. I don't think he touched on any of the pollen data or anything like that

A morality tale written as a dialogue, That like accepting A Midsummer Night's Dream as proof of fairies.

fairys!.jpg - 1024x768, 121.04K

A morality tale written as a dialogue

Pure speculation and assumption. The actual text does not say this, it simply presents the information.

That like accepting A Midsummer Night's Dream as proof of fairies.

That's a play which we explicitly know was written as fiction to be performed.

Always lol at Rogan and bros pissing and shitting themselves about how main stream media does people dirty when they did the exact same thing to The Dibbler.

Graham Hancock isn’t the first individual to make claims such as this.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Velikovsky

Velikovsky was basically derided for a while by Universities as pseudoscience.
After his death, his papers and unpublished works were published by one of his daughters, and are now stored at Princeton University.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bal_Gangadhar_Tilak

This is another author with similar “weird” theories.
His book, from 1903, arguing the North Pole was the original home of the Aryans.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Arctic_Home_in_the_Vedas

Plato and Plutarch both basically gave geographical descriptions that match distinct areas in the Americas.
In the case of Plutarch, distances and directions that were somewhat accurate, were given for Greenland and what would likely have been Northern Canada, with a description that would be recognizable to anyone that has watched the first season of “Ice Road Truckers”, which ironically aired on The History Channel.

Why are people still seething about this gay debate hosted by a stool-fucker

retards.jpg - 1200x675, 433.17K

Timaeus is mostly devoted to natural philosophy.
Critias starts out rambling in a similar fashion.
Both are in the form of a dialogue, which would tend to point towards fiction for the purpose of discussion.

I'm right and big archaeology is bullshit!

Ok where is your evidence?

Oh I'm just a journalist, I'm just asking questions.

Ok so you are just grifting for attention then?

LOOK SEE BIG ARCHEOLOGY HATES ME. THEY CALL ME NAMES

Fuck this clown. I know plenty of academics can be faggots but this faggot is clearly just trying to get attention.

DIBBLE DABBLERS WW@

MAINSTREAM ARCHEOLOGY IS TRYING TO SILENCE ME
watch my netflix series btw

Flint, time for bed. The rest of America is already asleep.

I've been a Dibbler from day one

Timaeus is mostly devoted to natural philosophy.

Critias starts out rambling in a similar fashion.

Both are in the form of a dialogue, which would tend to point towards fiction for the purpose of discussion.

“Was and is there accurate information in them that lines up with known truths” ?
This is the important part.
Most classical literature no longer exists.
There could have been boring fact based works, that other authors referenced for an audience that would have read those works, but those works no longer exist, so all that is left are obscure references in “fiction”.
There is also the chance that certain information was kept from the general “plebs”, by referencing that information as mythological tales of uncertain accuracy, or as dialogue pretending that information is fake, so that only those with a wide breadth of knowledge, and access to better scientific knowledge, would be able to tell that that “fiction” that is presented, is actually truth.
This is a system that exists in the present day with Masonic imagery, and which seems to have existed far before “FreeMasonry” existed, which can be told by some of the imagery used, and the way that current imagery references older historically verifiable facts that were unknown for centuries or longer.