We always get Hitler/Nazi movies but hardly ever any communist movies

why is that? i wanna watch a epic kino about Lev Davidovich Bronstein.

images.jpg - 193x262, 5.71K

Thanks for the raid Ivan. Communism wasn't Jewish.

99% of movies are communist movies. Also fuck that nigger stalin for not going with trotsky's cool black leather aesthetic.

Early Soviet Union was a huge cluster fuck and modern writers are allergic to doing any research

Yes, theres a Russian miniseries from a few years back called "Trotsky" that was pretty good. It being a Russian series I thought they would gloss over the Soviet history, but its pretty upfront with showing the communist as mass murderers.

being useful idiots and cannon fodder for those who run hollywood should pay, I agree

watch the new Mussolini series

multiple scenes of the blackshirt thugs attacking the socialist and communist

everytime, the blackshirts are all giant dudes yelling and screaming while the socialist are all old ladies or women

only a few of them are men, and they are always just normal guys ruthlessly attacked by the Fascist

Im not even making a dindu nuffin argument for Mussolini, but depicting the communist as just moderate voters playing by the rules until the mean fascist cowards attacked their grandmas is so fucking stupid. Both the Fascist and Communist of Italy had their own jackbooted thug militias who were using knives, guns, clubgs, and bombs on each other, civilians, and the police.

The early Soviet Union had many interesting directors, I'm waiting for someone to make a film about this, not about politics. As an example: the well-known Jewish director (he was a Christian) who made Potemkin, Alexander Nevsky and Ivan the Terrible.
Fun fact: Stalin loved watching westerns.

Imagine a kino about Trotsky, Lenin, and Stalin up to Lenin's death?
Can't recall any director today that could pull it off

jews run hollywood
and jews don't want to touch the ussr too much since all the death camps were in their sphere

can't start questioning this and that narrative

make a movie about kike who destroyed the Russian Empire with his friends.

Because marxists are in charge of Hollywood and won't besmirch their murderous friends.

The Death of Stalin is forever KINO for showing how fucking stupid the commies running that country were.
youtu.be/CC7iAsbBxMY?si=5FNSHsD9XdoZqy5d

and jews don't want to touch the ussr too much

Why then did they make so many films in the 80s about bad ussr communists who would attack America?

That's Sam Hyde in a funni outfit

being a Russian series I thought they would gloss over the Soviet history,

Nigga please, in the last 30 years in Russia they have filmed a ton of shit about how bad life was under the USSR, you just don’t watch this and don’t look for this. Probably the most romanticized era is Tsarist Russia (if this does not apply to literary adaptations of Dostoevsky)

because the people that control hollywood invented it

Get lost you shit eating pinko scum

Socialism wasn't jewish, but Communism certainly was.

Name 14 Russian kinos that do this

What we really need is gaddafist kino

71yIJ6PfUeL.jpg - 860x1282, 148.59K

forgot this too, a film thats strangely cynical about communism but still a great movie
youtube.com/watch?v=gOxKScK1KOU

they will never admit the real reason behind the NATO campaign

His goons shot Doc Brown

The Jews won't allow it.

Who the fuck would ever want to watch it? Who the fuck would ever want to see that fucking mug staring at you for two and a half hours?
Theres more than enough subversive commie fucking messages in cinema; why the fuck would we want to give them one to fellate and worship?
One icepick wasn't enough.

Have you ever seen a movie before?

Yeah, they're all made by jews, I get it. Doesn't mean I want to watch one about a fucking jew.
Look at that beady eyed motherfuckers picture and ask yourself why would ever want to see that thing leering at you even if it is a completely different actor in makeup? Knowing these assholes, they would probably get someone handsome to play him.

why is that?

golly gee i wonder why the capitalists don't want to fund any films that even bring up an alternative way of structuring society
truly a mystery

like did you know that Lenin's intended heir was neither Trotsky or Stalin, but some other dude named Yakov Sverdlov

good morning reddit

Yakov Sverdlov

Sverdlov was born in Nizhny Novgorod as Yakov-Aaron Mikhailovich Sverdlov[3] to Jewish parents, Mikhail Izrailevich Sverdlov and Elizaveta Solomonova.

They're still trying to make communism happen.

Sam hyde as incredible trotsky

I think the rise of Nazism/Hitler is just easier to dramatize due to being an explosive them vs enemy scenario culminating in WW2, rather than an internal systemic tragedy prolonged by the ruthless societal upheaval of callous politicians, on top of being more relevant to the recent history of Western culture
The major precipitating factors behind the party's ascent were both mostly condensed to a relatively brief strip of history, spanning Germany's bitter loss in WW1, the post-war political, economic quagmires creating an environment of immense discontentment, and the slow yet inexorable series of compromises made by pre-existing governance as the Nazi's took hold in politics and transformed the spirit of Germany's people. The resentment, national pride, xenophobia, and urge for recognition on a global scale play to very simplistic human desires and beliefs, reflected in the ability of a master demagogue like Hitler to tap into the minds of his people. The psychology behind it is easy and satisfying to comprehend.

By contrast, the leadup to the October Revolution, itself a prelude to the true horrors of applied communism, requires an extensive prefatory coverage of 19th century Russia, Tsarism, and tangential issues like Russia's inefficient and distant elitist leadership, widespread poverty, and shoddy national infrastructure. The years covering the same time span as Weimar are similar murky and rife with civil conflicts and systemic issues as the Bolshevik's establish cold-bloodedly stamp out the remnants of opposition. Stalin's administrative dominion of the politburo and underhanded scheming of the system against his more idealistic and fervent peers to provide him the greatest leverage, ultimately resulting in his indomitable rise in the leadership struggle in the years following Lenin's demise, paints a more complex, duplicitous, and sneaky psychology, rather than one driven by the relentless force of human yearnings like Hitler. Stalin's five year plans, at a surface level seem like rational and inevitable upheavals of a stagnant and outdated economy, especially compared to comparable attempts at radically transforming society in the Western world like the New Deal, but in practice, resulted in the mass starvation and suffering of countless millions by inhuman apathy to the human cost.

Heart of a Dog

Take your meds

Trotsky is a chud.
Lenin was the based one

Kinofied.jpg - 387x543, 31.89K

DIS NIGGA LOOK ZESTY

He looks like a mixture of Jewish and Indian.

No one said it was until you popped up

I was thinking he looked like the prince or whatever he was in the second Indy movie set in pooland

It would be impossible to not show what psychotic backstabbing lunatics the communists especially the bolsheviks were. Its easier for them to just now depict it at all.

Train Trotsky movie could be great.

freeze frame

record scratch

Bronstein with icepick in forehead

"yep, that's me! I bet you're wondering how I ended up in this situation!"

stereotypical Ivan with Saturday morning cartoon villain plan

ethnically homogenous regime party member with socially engineered genocides and gulags

I’m not sure these are the same thing

that was after they wore out their welcome (yet again!) and got kicked out