women cant make kin-
Women cant make kin-
o
Clueless? more like Kinoless
LMAO what if I fuck my step brother
It was truly ahead of its time.
clueless? more like gooless. get it? because i ejaculated so many times that i ran out of sperm
huh? I don't get it
ROLLIN' WITH THE HOMIES
Women directors actually have shit out some classics, Big, Fast Times, Point Break, Wayne's World, American Psycho, Near Dark. I think if they steer away from feminist bullshit they do alright.
Don't forget Ravenous. And Near Dark is in upper level of top vampkinos ever made.
I literally typed Ravenous but then thought no one would know about it.
the whole brother fucking plot becoming the main focus of the movie always threw me off, its funny cause people basically treat this movie like the Brittany Murphy movie and shes just cute but not a huge focus outside of the beginning
villain is evil because...he has a refined palate
dont forget the genius behind all your favorite Aryan aesthetic edits.
Only sporadically.
Every kinosseur knows Ravenous.
5-6 films out the 100s they fail
they're not bad
How fucking stupid are you?
rich jew girl falls in love with gay guy
realises he is gay
then falls in love with her jew cousin, happy ending
What did (((Hollywood))) mean by this ?
cousin
Stepbrother you zoomer
How womenbros even collectively directed 100s of movies?
it was a step brother from a previous marriage. so they're aren't even step siblings legally. pretty sure they couldn't stand each other when they lived together and only started to like each other when they matured
This movie blows and people that like it have bad taste. Alicia Silverstone was hot though
Ravenous
Extremely random choice. That guy from Blur should be in jail and whatever studio exec messed with it too but it still manages to get a K for Kino. Congratulations, woman director.
Still the best adaptation of Emma. The update to the family connection aspect to keep the audience's view in line with how Austen's contemporaries would have felt about the original family bonds was masterful.
It's been popular with genre film losers since it came out. I wouldn't call it a random choice.
thinking no one would know about Ravenous
This is a Ravenous board, goddammit!
I'd never heard of it before 3 weeks ago and I am the arbiter of taste on this board and elsewhere. Also doesn't it have a few different directors
Kids these days...
it's the elders who have failed them
not true. I mention Ravenous from time to time. Not my fault the yoots don't lurk and are more interested in Anon Babble memeing than actually learning about kino to watch.
ok. boomer. whatever you say.
you're telling me clueless is an adaptation of jane austens emma?
Yes
No
As if!
Maybe
You goofus Anon Babble suggested it to me maybe 10 years ago, what a great little film
Yeah man. A rich girl playing around with a poorer girl's life, introducing her to her clique and playing matchmaker and thinking she's doing what's best for her but actually making things worse? Then growing as a person and realising she actually loves the older "brother" that she's been dismissive of up until then? That's Emma baby.
And in case the family connection bit needs explaining: in the original story Emma is very good friends with her brother-in-law (his brother being married to her sister) Mr. Knightley. In Austen's time this meant they were actually like brother and sister in the eyes of their neighbours and anyone entering into a marriage with those connections was seen as kind of incestuous but not enough to get run out of town. It's why they have such a close relationship without anyone thinking it's odd or scandalous for them to spend so much time together, which they would have if it had been any other man. Because everyone sees them as siblings through marriage. There was even an explicit law that forbid a widow from marrying his sister-in-law, because it was seen as an incestuous marriage in the eyes of the church, which made some couples elope abroad to get married up until the 1900s when it was repealed. They just skirted that law.
Since no modern viewer would look at a brother-in-law situation and be as weirded out as Austen's contemporaries were they updated it, so that the viewer would go "ew isn't that incest??", despite them really only being connected by their parent's marriage, so there isn't any actual incest going on just like in the original. They also made him a bit younger while still keeping an age gap, because the original age gap (Mr. Knightley having held Emma as a baby) would have been seen as WAY weirder than it was in Austen's time. They perfectly updated it to carry the same level of slight scandal while still being okay. Fantastic bit of writing.
That was me. Your welcome
I miss those threads at 3 am about all those random horror movies, yellow brick road, triangle and more that I can't even remember.
Not all of them great but it was fun.
Hollyjews kill Anon Babble.
as if